The French Empire's invasion of North Vietnam aroused many people's suspicions. As the news of the superpower in northern Southeast Asia's invasion of the western rebellion spread in Western countries, many people understood Napoleon III's intentions. With the British attack in northern Burma, everyone understood

As a result, the colonial status of these two European powers in the Far East and Southeast Asia became more and more consolidated.

However, the Far East is too far away, and the situation on the other side of the Atlantic has successfully consolidated the attention of many Europeans.

After Lincoln was assassinated, Vice President Andrew Johnson demanded to trace the progress of Lincoln's assassination after being sworn in as president. Many people have been paying attention to this.

On May 3, 1868, former Secretary of State Seward was stabbed at home. Although he did not die, he was seriously injured. The United States of America was shocked, and the world was shocked again.

The murderer was also not caught, but the evidence left behind clearly showed that he was an Irishman.

Is this a competition between the two major ethnic groups in the Commonwealth of America?

Andrew Johnson was very angry about this.

"When did our country become a paradise for criminals? No, we don't need this kind of life. No one wants to live in such a horrible world. No one wants it."

So he angrily ordered that while intensifying the suppression of demonstrations, he also asked major media outlets in the American Federation to carry out propaganda conducive to management and guide people out of fear.

In the Dutch weekly "Echo", which is currently influential on both sides of the Atlantic, an article dedicated to this topic caused a global sensation.

The top leaders of various countries are even more prepared, because many people understand that the Federal Republic of America seems to be causing trouble again.

I saw the headline in the "Echo": "Are the assassinations of Lincoln and Seward really accidental?"

The interviewee of "Echo" weekly is Charles Eliot, the oldest and most influential president of Harvard University in North America since 1863.

"Why do I raise this question? Because few people realize this, but the broader scope of the Abraham Lincoln assassination, we have to admit that the scope of the incident went far beyond the murder of one man -

Kill - Eucalyptus.

This is actually part of a three-pronged attack aimed at destabilizing the entire Commonwealth of America.

When the murderer shot President Lincoln in the head with his pistol, the other murderer almost reached his destination, the home of former Secretary of State Seward, just a few streets away from Ford's Theater where Lincoln was assassinated.

This incident is so egregious that it is unacceptable to the federal government of the United States."

Charles Eliot speculated that, therefore, the complete Abraham Lincoln incident would not only kill the president, but also fire the next president from office and stifle the bloodshed in the hard-won peace of the Civil War that had just ended.

At the end, the American Federation was plunged into chaos.

He also said that Lincoln's own murder really plunged the country into chaos.

He further said that since Lincoln expressed support for the right of black slaves to vote in the Civil War in 1863 in order to attract the support of northern blacks, many people were actually dissatisfied with him, especially the Confederate States.

This is the cleverness of the murderer.

In this way, the president of Harvard University unfolded his own opinions.

But his opinion caused an uproar in Europe and the United States, because the principal actually attacked a European and American behemoth.

Now many people don't understand why he did this.

William IV showed his appreciation and secretly said: James, the editor-in-chief of the Echo, is becoming more and more powerful in writing.

In the undivided United States of the mid-19th century, the debate over slaves was based on economic interests first and morality second.

At that time, the mainstay of the southern economy was the cotton planting industry and slavery. If slavery was abolished, farmers would have to pay wages to the original slaves according to the market price of white labor. Then the entire southern planting industry would

Falling into losses, the social and economic structure is bound to collapse.

William IV understood this very well, not to mention the plantation slave owners.

William IV looked at the "Echo" weekly and couldn't help but smile bitterly, because he understood that this academic ally who was close to President Andrew was obviously helping Andrew to sell money to other European consortium financiers in the Commonwealth of America.

We issued an ultimatum and showed our swords.

William IV understood that people in Europe could remain calm after seeing the following interview with the president of Harvard University, not even the largest financial group in Europe.

Charles Eliot said this.

"If war is a continuation of political struggle, then behind the conflict of political interests is the competition of economic interests.

This contest of economic interests appears on the surface to be an economic disparity between the North and the South, but in essence it is a strategy played by international financial forces to divide the newly born American Commonwealth."

William IV remembered reading in a previous life that Prussian Prime Minister Bismarck, who had a deep connection with the Rothschilds, the largest conglomerate in Europe, said it very clearly: "There is no doubt that the split of the American Commonwealth into North and South

In this weak federal state, the price of indoor station explosions has long been determined by Europe's financial powers."

Therefore, William IV had long used Bismarck's statement to track and verify it, and it turned out to be the case.

Charles Eliot also said: "The bankers of the London, Paris, and Frankfurt axis were the masterminds behind the Civil War in the American Commonwealth. In order to provoke it, the international bankers in these places conducted a long and careful

And careful planning.

During the Millennium War of Independence, the textile industry of the British Empire established close commercial ties with the slave-owning class of southern Millenia. European financiers spotted this opportunity and took advantage of the opportunity to secretly develop and challenge each other in the future.

The network of people who started the conflict between North and South.

In the South at that time, various agents of the British Empire's financiers were everywhere. They worked with local political forces to formulate plots to break away from the Commonwealth of America, and concocted various news and public opinions. They cleverly used the conflicts between the North and the South in slavery.

The conflict of economic interests on the issue of slavery continued to intensify, highlight and detonate this originally not a hot topic in the American Commonwealth, and finally succeeded in catalyzing the issue of slavery into a sharp conflict between the North and the South.

At the same time, the international bankers are fully prepared to wait for the war to start, and then make a huge fortune from the war. In the process of instigating the war, their effective strategy is to bet on both sides. No matter who loses or wins, the huge amount of money will be lost.
Chapter completed!