The flight attendant said to the leader: "You have no direct evidence to prove that I am the mastermind behind the scenes. You cannot condemn me just by saying one side of this person."

"Take the guy down."

The leader said angrily, and then the other minions took the killer down.

Only this flight attendant was left on the scene.

I said to the flight attendant, "Now the killer has admitted in person that you are the one who made him kill people. I want to ask you for the second time, why did you kill the priest?"

"Well, since you believe I am the mastermind of the priest who killed the priest, then give me a reason, why should I kill that person?"

The flight attendant made a reverse problem.

Faced with the other party's questioning, the leader and I sneered.

It can be seen that because we do not have strong actual evidence, the person in front of us will obviously not plead guilty to us.

Is this mastermind her?

With the assassin's testimony and the marks on the chest can be combined, now 80% of them can be determined that this flight attendant must be the mastermind of the case.

As long as you find direct evidence to prove that the flight attendant has a deal with the murderer, the flight attendant will not be able to escape.

I said to the leader: "I want to talk to the murderer alone, you can go over and arrange it."

The leader glared at the flight attendant and turned around and went out.

I looked at the flight attendant and saw that the flight attendant's face turned pale. I asked her, "You are a beauty, how can you be a thief?"

"Stop talking about me here. I didn't kill anyone. Do you dare to bet with me?"

Unexpectedly, the flight attendant actually wanted to make a bet with me.

I smiled and said, "I don't have so much time to waste with you. I hope you don't waste your expressions with me, because sooner or later we will find out."

Just as I finished saying this, the leader suddenly ran in hurriedly.

The leader said to me as soon as he entered the house: "Killer, the killer is dead."

"Has someone silenced?"

I was shocked that this sudden situation shocked everyone.

This is a cabin for criminals.

The killer died on the bed, with a pair of hanging around his neck, which looked like a woman's underwear, which was hung on the bed frame.

From the scene, the killer should have committed suicide with this woman's underwear.

The killer and the killer commit suicide with a woman's underwear. This suicide method is a bit incredible.

After I got closer, I saw the killer's mouth spitting white foam, and the expression on his face seemed to be very frightened. Before the killer died, he seemed to have witnessed something terrifying.

Is the white foam in the killer's mouth scared because the killer was vomited, or is it because of the smell on the woman's pants that the killer vomited out by himself.

Both of these ideas seem a bit absurd.

So I thought of the third idea, whether the killer would die of poisoning, so this kind of foam would spit out of his mouth.

I turned around and said to the leader, "Have this killer eaten anything just now?"

"According to understanding, he didn't eat anything this morning. If you suspect he was poisoned, this suspicion would not be very valid."

The leader said it very decisively.

I frowned and stared at the leader: "How do you know that he has nothing to eat? Are you inseparable from him?"

"Because such people will die sooner or later, don't waste food, so there is a rule on our island that as long as people who commit death penalty, we will not give them food."

The leader said this sounded cruel.

But facing some murderous monsters, not giving them food may be the idea that everyone wants the most.

To outsiders, this may be done a bit inhuman, but rather a defiance of human rights.

But then again, when these killers were killing people, did they ever think about the issue of human rights?

Now the problem is here.

This killer didn't eat anything, so why did he spit out such white foam in his mouth?

Could it be that because the killer hadn't eaten for a long time, a kind of stomach acid appeared in his stomach. After the transformation of this stomach acid and body fluids, it turned into white foam and vomited it out of the killer's mouth?

The leader looked at the killer in front of him who had been dead for a long time: "Obviously, this is a very obvious killing silence."

"Do you think the killer's death has something to do with the previous case?"

I also stared at the dead killer and asked the leader.

The leader nodded and said, "If it weren't for killing people to silence them, it would be difficult to find other ways to explain, because the time of his death was very critical, just as we interrogate the mastermind."

I suddenly said in surprise: "Do you still think that flight attendant is the mastermind?"

After I asked this question, the leader suddenly felt strange.

The leader raised his head and asked me, "What does it mean? Is the suspicion of the flight attendant being ruled out like this?"

"When the killer died, the flight attendant was always by our side and there was no time to commit the crime. This only means that if you want to kill someone to silence the murderer, there is another one."

I speak out my point of view.

The leader took a deep breath: "So we have always set our target on the flight attendant. In fact, from the beginning, we were thinking about it. This real murderer was always holding our noses, right?"

"No matter what, the suspicion of the flight attendant is ruled out."

I shook my head.

I feel that this matter is becoming more and more brain-burning. It seemed like a case that was easy to win before, but now it is becoming more confusing.

I originally thought the flight attendant was the mastermind, but when the mastermind was with us, the accomplice was killed by someone else, which was a bit incredible.

The leader said: "What's wrong with the birthmark on her chest? Can you give us a good explanation?"

"The best explanation is that the flight attendant was also blamed."

I began to clear my mind, but the leader couldn't understand: "Why did you say you were being blamed? Is there a reason for this reason for framing?"

"Another woman was also blamed. Have you forgotten that when the killer first corrected him, he pointed to another woman, and did not point to the flight attendant."

I remembered the first time this killer testified.

At that time, the killer said that another woman asked her to kill the priest, but the problem was that he said that another woman had a birthmark on her chest.

Another woman did not have any birthmarks on her chest, so why didn't he testify against the flight attendant? The flight attendant was already at the scene at that time.

The figure and height of the flight attendant and the other person are very different. This killer cannot confuse the two people with such differences.

The leader nodded: "I understand what you mean. There are two strange points in this case. The first strange place is the appearance of the mastermind, and the second strange place is the birthmark of the mastermind."

"Yes, this killer recognized his appearance and birthmark as two people. If he hadn't been talking nonsense, it would be obvious that the third person was the one who made a deal with him."

I said.

The leader also understood something: "And this third person knew the two people in front of him, otherwise he would not have told the killer about the characteristics of the two people in front of him."

It seems that after following me for a while, this leader has become smarter and has the potential to be a detective.

I patted the leader on his shoulder.

Said to him: "I'm going to perform an autopsy on this killer soon. You're outside, don't let anyone get close to you, no one can enter this house."

Hearing me say this, the leader became nervous.

He stood up and asked, "Why should we be so serious?"

"If I guess well, our opponent is still staring at us in the dark, and our every move will affect the other party's next actions."

I've said it very clearly.

The leader gasped and lowered his voice: "I didn't expect this to be so exciting. So many of us were played around by such an invisible person. I don't know where he is."

"No matter where he is, his fox tail will be revealed soon. Go and do things."

After I led the leader away, I lifted the little killer off the bed and placed it flat on the floor.

It is obvious that the person's death was suffocation, because there was a deep mark on his neck. Was this mark caused by the underwear?

I picked up my underwear.

This is a pair of underwear that looks very ordinary. The quality of the underwear is not very hard. It is obviously impossible to strangle an adult with this underwear.

But why does this pair of underwear appear on the killer's neck? Is this killer a pervert who likes to collect women's things?

I put the underwear aside and continued to check the killer's injuries. I found that in addition to being strangled, the killer also showed signs of being hit by a heavy object in the ear door.

If a person's ear is hit hard, it will cause a concussion at the first time. From this, it can be inferred that the killer was attacked twice.

The first time I was knocked out, and the second time I was strangled to death by someone.

The murderer's method of committing the crime seemed cruel and calm, and it was obvious that he was a veteran.

Killing such a person is as simple as killing an ant. From this we can infer that the murderer must be no ordinary person.

I once again looked at the bubbles on the mouth of the dead.
To be continued...