Yes, the catheter for interventional surgery can only be placed at the proximal end of the ophthalmic artery for spraying or stenting. If these places are blocked, there is no need to say more. There is a chance to place the catheter and stent here, and the effect of thrombolysis is relatively
good.
The catheter and stent are limited because the diameter of the blood vessel cannot be sent to the terminal blood vessels of the retinal. Only the thrombolytic drugs can be dissolved through the ocular artery accurately reach the blocked position of the retinal artery, perhaps it can. However, if the thrombolytic drugs are feasible,
Why do you have this interventional surgery? It’s like taking the whole body vein directly.
As a big shot in the industry, Dr. Hu's ophthalmologist knows the foundation of these surgeries and will not deceive Dr. Hu's colleagues. After preliminary examination, it is determined that the possibility of Dr. Hu's embossment at the end is very high, so it is used as a thrombus stent.
I'm afraid I didn't succeed.
Any surgery is risky.
People have done research abroad, and there is no difference in the treatment effects of intravenous thrombolysis and interventional local thrombolysis. This is the first and second, the risk of this interventional surgery in ophthalmology is very high, which is more than intravenous lysis.
The incidence of ductile adverse events is tens of percent higher.
This interventional surgery in ophthalmology is not done by an ophthalmologist, but by an ophthalmologist on site, and an internal medicine interventionist is required. From the above incidence of poor surgery, it can be seen that this surgery has a very high technical level for interventional surgeons.
.
Think about it, domestic interventional surgery has been catching up with foreign countries. The training of interventional surgeons can be said to have not met foreign standards. There are very few real ophthalmic interventional skills. Foreign experts have done this, and you are in China
There are very few experts and doctors who want to find such guaranteed experts. What's more, Dr. Hu is an extremely rare binocular attack, not monocular, and the risk of interventional surgery is higher.
Finally, Dr. Hu’s previous intravenous thrombolysis treatment proved that it was correct not to undergo interventional surgery. Because Dr. Hu’s emboli in the central retinal artery blood vessels cannot be completely dissolved by thrombolytic drugs. It means that you have an interventional surgery locally.
Thrombolysis is risky and is also useless.
After hearing the doctor's words, Mr. Liu lowered his head, indicating that the information he asked for for his wife was invalid.
If you are not an insider, the fragmented information you hear about must be biased, which is normal.
Maybe his wife, Dr. Hu, had almost given up because she had known this.
Mr. Liu was full of sorrow and asked the doctor earnestly: "Last night, many doctors suggested that I come to you, Dr. Cao. Are you helpless with my wife's disease? In fact, what their doctor said last night
, I don’t understand it very well. Is there any way to find a way to find a nerve in ophthalmology?”
"I just told you about the ophthalmic treatment part. Your wife applied thrombolysis medicine within a few hours, abolished some embolics, and bought herself valuable delay time so that the doctor could think of some more ways to treat you
Madam's disease. Now it seems that the remaining emboli in your wife should be calcified or cholesterol, so it cannot be dissolved. If it cannot be dissolved, it can only be done to find a way to get the emboli out." Cao Yong
Said, "Your wife's disease often occurs with stroke, which shows that the two are closely related. Dr. Hu's disease is an ophthalmic disease. From the perspective of anatomical relationship, the arterial system that supplies blood can be said to be attributed to
Chapter completed!