Let’s first blow up the Liangzhu civilization. As early as a few years ago, when I was interpreting the Shanhai Jing, I mentioned the cultural relics of the Liangzhu culture. There are also many corresponding Shanhai Jing, which may be Di Jun.

At that time, I had not successfully applied for World Heritage, so it was not called civilization. But I paid attention to Liangzhu a long time ago and kept waiting for it to be dug.

The same is true for Sanxingdui. I have been waiting for it to write, which is a pity.

Some people are playing tricks and say that the bronze sacred tree was dug according to the tomb robber's notes. I was drunk... Sanxingdui has been dug thirteen times, and the bronze sacred tree was unearthed in 1986.

The Jade Cong King of Liangzhu was also unearthed in 1986. Later, the dam and ancient city were dug out. At first, the ancient city wall was thought to be a ditch, but it was filled with many stones. After research, it was realized that it was the base of the city wall, and then I realized that it was a civilization.

Now Liangzhu has become a sacred land of civilization for five thousand years, I am very happy.

Wall, Cong, Yue, this kind of ritual vessel is definitely a Chinese civilization, bird culture worship, sun worship, and country of great correspondence to the country of Emperor Junxi and Shaohao.

It doesn’t matter if it is not. Anyway, the later “Dongyi tribe” and the Shang Dynasty did absorb the bird culture and the strong “ghost worship” in Liangzhu.

Liangzhu, Chinese civilization, accounts for nearly half, at least one-third.

But some people have to criticize one if they praise one, and they will show me the vomiting.

Some people in Zhihu are too superstitious about the theory of Liangzhu going north to conquer, saying that the Yellow River Basin is all barbarians, but they really cannot agree.

I saw a guy named Qingfeng on Zhihu who defamed the culture of the Yellow River Basin. His main remarks are as follows.

‘Liangzhu went north to conquer Dawenkou and became Longshan, established the Yu Dynasty, and continued the local culture by the lower class population, and the upper class aristocratic culture was replaced.’

‘The upper limit of Haidai Longshan is 2300 BC, followed by the lower limit of Liangzhu. They are so similar, and there is no reason to believe that they are in the same lineage.’

‘Yangshao culture is not like China, and it still lives in the Dog Cave… I only realized that this is my ancestor when I saw the glory of Liangzhu.’

These remarks are explosive.

This is equivalent to the theory of the north and extreme becoming the theory of the south.

Now the official has clearly stated that the origin of civilization is made up of the stars and the integration of multiple cultures.

In ancient times, there were many ethnic groups, and there were elements of Chinese civilization everywhere. They were all shareholders. If Liangzhu was defined as a civilization, it would become the only shareholder?

The Liangzhu people could go north to conquer, and this productivity was so that the King of Qin could sweep Liuhe three thousand years ahead of schedule.

The Qin system is so awesome, but it is still difficult to compatible with the cultures of various places. Why is Liangzhu? It is just based on the worship of ghosts and gods? It is wasted a lot on jade artifacts based on productivity?

Later Chinese civilization had many Liangzhu cultures, which were caused by cultural integration that lasted for hundreds or thousands of years.

It is impossible that the upper population of Liangzhu ruled the lower population of the Yellow River Basin.

If culture is absorbed and even if it is conquered, then can modern China be considered a "European civilization"?

We were excavated countless years later and discovered a large number of industrial products. Then Europe discovered the earliest industrial products. Judging from the archaeological traces, Europe gave birth to an industrial civilization. At the same time, there was no industry or very few in the East. So archaeologists countless years later believed that around the 20th century, European civilization conquered the whole world.

This is the pain of no text unearthed in pastoral archaeology.

Anything you can say can be written into a paper.

I think it's ridiculous to have a quarrel about the origin of civilization, the Central Plains theory, and the Liangzhu theory.

The Central Plains Central Theory does not have enough prominent and dazzling cultural relics to compete with Liangzhu’s archaeological achievements to prove that the Central Plains civilizations at the same time can only talk about the ‘gene’, saying that Liangzhu was an ancient Yue people and was not the main ethnic group of China.

I was drunk, and the barbarians entered China and then went to China. Since the Zhou Dynasty, I will not talk about bloodline. That is something that all European civilizations like to talk about, and we only talk about cultural connotations.

The most important thing about Chinese civilization is cultural identity.

As for the Liangzhu Centralism, it has been emerging recently, and I wish Liangzhu was everything, everything originated from Liangzhu.

The main remarks are: 'Liangzhu is a civilization with developed civilization attributes and the most powerful during the same period. Therefore, the five emperors of Fuxi, Nuwa and Yanhuang who we are familiar with are all from Liangzhu. Even Dayu controlled the floods and controlled the waters in Qiantang River... Because the flood destroyed the old land of Liangzhu, the ancestors of Liangzhu went north to occupy the Central Plains, drove away the Miaoman group, and established the later civilization'.

I am from the south myself, and I vomited even after seeing it. I can even tolerate the Central Plains theory, after all, it has existed since ancient times.

It was from Shang and Zhou dynasties to Qin and Han dynasties, and countless documents were brainwashing us openly and secretly, and civilization originated from the Yellow River Basin. So I can understand that people who still hold the Central Plains theory now.

After all, for thousands of years, the cultural and historical status has been there. Especially in the Central Plains, many people believe that civilization must have originated in Heluo.

The record of the Grand Historian says, "The residences of the three generations were all between Heluo." This is understandable.

Liangzhu Centralism is completely different from the same nature.

The official used the stars to replace the "centrism" and slowly changed people's idea of ​​the origin of Heluo. However, a wave of people insisted on going from one extreme to another.

They dug out the text and had a large amount of copywriting to prove that Dayu was a Liangzhu person, and the prehistoric flood actually refers to the Yangtze River Basin.

There are also people who copy and copy it, and then they talked about the Liangzhu aristocrats who ruled the northern tribe. Funny, which institute's conclusion?

A set of copywriting, a pair of archaeology and a pair of documents on the Internet are confusing half truth and half false, and it takes a lot of time to study and have a clear purpose.

Especially for the out-of-context meaning of "Yu Gong", I saw not only one person saying "The three rivers have entered the Zhenze and the bottom of the earth" that said that Dayu was the water control of the Qiantang River and Taihu Lake Basin.

It's basically a group output! There is a copywriting spread.

"Yu Gong": "After carrying Hukou, managing Liang and Qi, and after building Taiyuan, it is as far as Yueyang'. Taiyuan is located in the area of ​​Shan·Xifen River, Yueyang is Mount Huotai, which is located in the east of Shan·Xihuo County, where the Fen River passes. Why not mention it?

"Yu Gong" also said: "Jihe Road, Lei Xia Ji Ze, and the Sinju are in conjunction with each other." Could it be that Lei Xia is also Taihu Lake? This is clearly Heze, and both are tributaries of the Yellow River.

"Yu Gong" also said: "There are no more than the Yi, and Wei and Zibo are the way." Someone cut this paragraph and said that Dayu was a native of Shandong?

"Yu Gong" also says: "Huaiyi is governed, Mengyu is his art, Daye is his turf, and the east is flat." This is the southeast of Heshan, northern Jiangsu, and the southeast of the country. Daye is Juye Ze.

"Yu Gong" also said: "The Yangtze and Han dynasties are in the sea, the Jiujiang Kong Yin, the Tuoqian Dao, and Yunmeng was the rule." It also cured Yunmengze. Is Dayu a native of Hubei?

"Yu Gong": "After the Yiluo River enters the river, the Xingbo Jizhu, the guide Heze, the pond Mengzhu, the Yellow River and Yiluo, will you not know each other?

"Yu Gong" also wrote: "Wu River is west, Jing belongs to Wei River. Qi Ju follows, Feng River is together'. Qi Ju is Luo River, Jing Wei River is Jing River and Wei River are both in Guanzhong.

In summary, "Shangshu Yu Gong" does write about Dayu governing the Qiantang River Basin, but Dayu also traveled all over the north and south, and the Yangtze River and the Yellow River were all under control.

This was clearly a far-fetched interpretation of the Qin and Han literati, who wanted to write about him and decided to make the entire Jiuzhou.

As a result, a group of people are now blocking the "Zhenze Di Ding", without mentioning the context, just saying that Dayu is a Taihu Lake native? Isn't this ulterior motive?

If you bully ordinary people, you won’t read the Book of Documents, right?

When I raised this question, I was deleted and banned. Then the man outputted it to me and posted a lot of copywriting that had been posted countless times. I couldn't reply yet, so I was furious.

There is another person called "Time Grassland", saying that all clues point to Yu's control of the Yangtze River, and there is no record of controlling the Yellow River.

He was so excited that he laughed to death. He took the Records of the Grand Historian to prove it, but the Records of the Grand Historian wrote that Dayu governed the Yellow River.

Sima Qian actually copied the Shangshu posted above and said about governing the Yellow River.

I have never seen such a person who can take things out of context. If you want to talk about literature, a large number of them point to the Yellow River. If you take a few words to say it is Liangzhu, what is the difference between this and Confucian scholars making up history?

Nowadays, no one can determine where the Yu Dynasty is, whether it is, or what it is. They will know? To put it bluntly, are you still reasoning with just a few words? You are eager to achieve success for the answer they want?

I have read the copywriting of those people, and they are very rich, but they are all just a few words. Many places directly use "dialects" to explain it. Fuxi is the ancient Yue term, but in fact it is "Wu Xi". I am stupid.

Don’t struggle to find evidence that Dayu is from Zhejiang and Jiang in the literature and that Yu Chao is in Liangzhu.

This is outrageous. With the same method, countless people can find evidence that the Yu Dynasty was in the Central Plains, in the Shandong, and in the Shaanxi, and in the West. After all, isn’t it to desperately rely on Liangzhu as the main body of civilization?

I can also find the link of documentary evidence that Dayu is an alien from the old paper pile! Could it be that Dayu is an alien?

There are also those who provide evidence from Kuaiji Mountain, advocate that Dayu’s four major events in life, marriage, merit, alliance, and burial are all in Kuaiji Mountain in Shaoxing. In fact, it was a place where he returned home in glory. Dayu saw that the local native Fangfeng clan occupied the "Liangzhu former land" of his ancestors, and killed them in anger...

I'm really speechless.

The name of Kuaiji Mountain is very casual today. The designated by King Yue has neither evidence nor circumstantial evidence. King Yue claims to be "Xia Yu Miao, a son of Shaokang, and was granted the title of Kuaiji and worshipped Yu".

The credibility is but not high, which is likely to be the result of historical re-memorization caused by the needs of ethnic identity during the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.

At that time, the atmosphere was like this throughout the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. The vassal states far away from the Central Plains fabricated various awesome ancestors for themselves to integrate into the Chinese system.

When Sima Qian wrote the part of the Records of the Grand Historian, he directly copied the statement of "Yuejue Shu". Because it conforms to the Confucian theory of "Great China" and "Great Unification" that may be true, but it may also be false.

The literature is not absolute. I don’t know if King Goujian of Yue is a descendant of Xia Yu. I can only say that there is doubt.

However, Qi State was officially enthroned by the Zhou Dynasty. It is certain that it is Miao descent of the Xia Dynasty. It is officially recognized by the Zhou Dynasty. Therefore, if King Yue wants to compile it, he can only compile it as a "concubine son". This thing... he said it is.

Moreover, there is more than one statement in the literature. The Book of Documents clearly states that "Yu married in Tushan."

Dayu's marriage and merits and funerals should be within the scope of Tushan's activities. Tushan's family is the power of his wife's family, which is more reasonable. It is approximately in the northern Jiangsu region of the Huaihe River Basin, not the current Kuaiji Mountain.

Because Dayu was a "big accountant" and had a title of virtue and a title of merit, a certain mountain in the Tushan clan was called Kuaiji, which was in the Huaihe River Basin and within the AH territory.

"Shan Hai Jing" also describes Kuaiji Mountain in the south of Da Chu.

In some versions, some people changed the text to achieve political goals, changing "Nan of Great Chu" to "Great Vietnam", and some people used it as treasures. They completely ignored the "Shangshu" because the Shangshu was written in Tushan, and they did not need it.

I am not saying that the "Shangshu" is right, but that some people's behavior is typical of "shooting arrows first and drawing targets". What is useful should be ignored, useless, out of context, and pieced together copywriting.

I have done too much of this kind of thing... so I can tell at a glance.

Just look at the map of Yue Kingdom and you will know that Kuaiji Mountain has been in the north of Yue Kingdom and not the south. This is purely ignoring the geography and only changing one word.

Even the South of the Great Chu was written by people in the Warring States Period. In fact, the ancient Kuaiji Mountain could not be confirmed where it was, so Qin Shihuang visited the latest established crossing of Kuaiji Mountain.

The First Emperor did not go for Dayu, but went to the world to support others. Someone told him that there was a Kuaiji Mountain, which was the Dayu Mausoleum, so Qin Shihuang paid tribute to him.

To put it bluntly, Kuaiji Mountain is more likely to be decided by Yue State for various purposes. I have long known the original address of Dayu's alliance and burial.

Unless Dayu Mausoleum is dug out.

Liangzhu is indeed the most glorious civilization known on the land of China five thousand years ago. The earliest known Longshan culture of "China" inherited many craftsmanship and cultural factors of Liangzhu, but it also had huge changes.

Strictly speaking, Longshan culture should be called the "Longshan Era", which is a major watershed in archaeology. It refers to the Haidai region, the Central Plains region, and the Guanzhong region, and a large number of Neolithic cultures began to transform into Longshan culture.

From then on, we entered the era of city-states with many nations, and cities began to be built in various regions. Until the emergence of large groups of urban sites of ancient dynasty such as "Taosi Culture" and "Shimao Culture".
To be continued...