Before I write this incident, I have to give such a background introduction. It is very important. I hope readers can take some time to introduce this background to you. Otherwise, it will be difficult for you to understand the true meaning of this incident. (Editor's note: This is just like I introduce "scraping" to foreign readers. If you don't introduce the cultural background of this "scraping" thoroughly, many foreign readers will mistakenly think that the behavior is a violent act when they see the description of "scraping". In terms of popular words at present, it is "cultural differences".) Again... The incident I introduced is too different from the perception of our Chinese people, so I have to describe the cultural background of this incident.

1. Chinese people believe that when resolving some disputes, the emphasis is on "being polite first and then soldiers". When the two sides have conflicts, I have to want to reason with you. Wherever you are wrong, I hope you can pay attention and make rectifications. The reason does not make sense. Let's move the guys and speak with strength. But the cultural background of the incident I want to talk about does not have the concept of "being polite first and then soldiers". At most, there is "being polite first and then soldiers". First, fight first, decide the winner and loser, and then negotiate.

2. Contradictions and creating contradictions. In the history of Chinese wars, even if one side launches an aggressive war, it has to find a suitable "excusation", otherwise it will give people a feeling of "injury" and not a king's army. But in the incident I told, the two sides argue and fight, don't make excuses, or even have any contradictions, and fight. Many times, they don't know why, what is the purpose of the fight? It's very puzzling.

3. Robbery: The winning side of the battle will definitely do its best to confiscate the spoils, but when confiscating the spoils, for those scrapped, which have no effect and lost their value, the cost of confiscating the scam is generally not confiscated again. If the army of both sides fights, one side wins and confiscates a tank, but the tank has been bombed and scrapped. Its actual function is to sell scrap iron. If you dismantle and dismantle, the cost of transportation is far higher than the value of the scrap iron. According to the values ​​of our people, then this "pack of scrap iron" will be "discarded", but in the event I described, the winning side will not do this. They just want to dismantle it and sell it later, do this kind of "buy a box and return a bead", and waste the money and end the money, and I can't answer why. Let me introduce it here first, otherwise it will cause some obstacles to readers' understanding.

4,...

Of course, there are many differences in cultural background. I will make annotations in the article as much as possible to facilitate readers' reading. This incident is sensitive and has some heavy-tasting descriptions in the article. Readers who like freshness or have strong political tendencies can do not need to read it to avoid discomfort. (Editor's note: A kind reminder, before dining and sleeping, it is best not to read the article. The words in it may indeed cause gastrointestinal discomfort in some people.)

In July 2005, if you still have an impression of time, you should still remember that a genocide occurred in a small underdeveloped country. (Editor's note: To avoid matching and unnecessary political disputes, I will temporarily name this small underdeveloped country "Huikeli Democratic Republic" here, referred to as Huiguo for short. Because this incident is notorious, readers can basically search for it if they are Baidu Google. Once they find out, they hope that readers will not over-indulge in words and utterly spread the word, especially those with real names, which will have some negative effects. In order to avoid responsibility, I have to reluctantly type fifteen words - this incident is purely fictional, if there is any similarity, it is purely coincidental.)

The Democratic Republic of Huikeli was just established and was independent on the basis of the original "Shihui Special Republic" (Editor's Note: As always, using a pseudonym) autonomy. The Shihui Special Republic is a very obvious transition of racial contradictions. How to say it? Its founding fundamentally adopted a complex centralization. This regime is a bit like the United States. Each state in administrative divisions has a high degree of autonomy. But unlike the United States, the US states have a high degree of autonomy, which is the ownership of interests, and fundamentally supports the US Constitution. However, in the Shihui Special Republic, its states are completely because of the species.

The interests and contradictions of races, and the unchanging relationship between races. I don’t like you, and you don’t like me either. Once the two races have conflicts, they will not seek the protection of the country. In their concept, there is no country, and everyone will do it! This is a bit like the meaning of the three kingdoms in the late Eastern Han Dynasty, or the meaning of the various vassal states after the Anshi Rebellion of the Tang Dynasty in China, and the central government has no right to speak, and it is useless. Therefore, in 2005, it was a "disaster year" for the Shuaihuite Republic. In that year, four countries were independent, including "Huike Established a Democratic Republic". (hereinafter referred to as "Huiguo")

The Benefiting Kingdom regime is one of the rare jumping countries that directly crosses from slave society to capitalist society. The national foundation is extremely poor, and the legal awareness is weak. Some places still live a life of eating raw meat and drinking blood. Although this country is independent, internal contradictions are still very prominent. The main contradiction is whether industrialization continues to develop? This contradiction is like a joke in any country. It is a question that junior high school students can answer: agriculture-based, industry

As the dominant! Can this still be a problem? Can it still be a contradiction? Yes, this contradiction is an inevitable contradiction in this favorable country. Many people, especially those who are used to slave owners in slave society, have too much "power": land, wealth and incredible armed forces, and even private troops (the main components of this unit are composed of slaves from previous slave owners. After the country established a capitalist system, the flag changed and you are no longer a slave.

I'm a private bodyguard. Anyone can do anything about changing soup or medicine.) These slave owners guard their own fields, why? Is it industrialized for you? Is it impossible, he can count on these lands to "bring a chicken and a chicken". Some people may ask: Build a factory on your land and give you rent, can't this land still be money? No, the "slave owners" of the country don't think so: frequent wars, build factories? Build one bankrupt, who

Come and give you rent? But if you grow grain, this thing will be easy to deal with. No matter how ignorant the war is, you will know that what grows in this land will be needed by anyone. If you make a cup in your factory, it is not as real as I produce a pound of grain. Especially in the war era, this grain can be comparable to gold. Perhaps some people will question, are you not afraid of being strong when you grow grain? You are afraid! So I have to have a private armed force and use grain to cultivate armed force. This is the biggest problem of this country.

The power of the country, Shivaru Ludusa (pseudonym), was born in a slave owner's family. Strictly speaking, he was also the representative of the interests of the slave owner. His educational background was a bit strange. He studied capitalist political economy for six years in college, and four years in four years in socialist political economy. After that, if you study other majors, for example, if I study computers and then ancient Chinese literature, it is called compound talent. If you study these two political economy together, it is completely unrelated to compound

The people who are borderline are not considered talent. Socialism and capitalism are two major political products that are incompatible with water and fire. When you learn it together, you will not only not be able to integrate, but also split your personality from a psychological perspective. But Ludusa has a high vision and a high spirit, and thinks he is a genius politician. When he became the first president of Welfare, he thought that nothing is difficult in the world and anything can be easily solved. This includes the most fundamental contradiction of Welfare: Is industrialization going to continue to develop?

I don’t know what means Ludusa used to make the country independent from the “Shihui Special Republic”, but one thing is clear: if he can do this, he must have his own backstage. Who is his backstage depends on who will be the biggest beneficiary after the country is independent? The beneficiary is Ludusa’s backstage. But when I looked at the World Geography Magazine, I finished it... There are really many backstages: there are capitalist countries and socialist countries. This is why he learned four years of capitalism and the biggest premise of Marxism-Leninism in two years!

The reason why there are so many backstages is that the mineral resources and geographical location of Huiguo are really important in the world geography. So, Huiguo has a mineral resources that are the most needed by several oligarchs in the world. What is it? I am not convenient to say. As soon as everyone knows it, it doesn’t matter if you don’t say it, and it doesn’t affect the subsequent development of the incident. Ludusa also understands that if there are too many "masters", he will “look in the mirror |——it’s not people inside or outside”. Therefore, he also has his own plan, which is to “change with the wind”. During this period, when there are more resources for capitalist state aid, he will be pro-capitalized. For a while, when there are more resources for socialist state aid, he will be pro-society. But this self-smart approach not only fails to govern his country well, but instead causes the country to suffer an unprecedented disaster: Don’t think that those countries that aid are fools!!

Here, I want to introduce the protagonist of this story: Hong Jiwen. Everyone has experienced the title of this comrade before, but maybe everyone is not very clear about some of her international identities. Her master is Yu Wenfang, her father is Director Hong, Master, and even more amazing. International hypnosis master Jones Delavi. Hong Jiwen grew up under this series of halos. In many cases, she is an international goodwill ambassador. She finally chose to support her in Vietnam, which shows how profound her political background is. (To be continued...)
Chapter completed!