China wakes up - we are the despicable sinners!

Someone asked me, what is the purpose of writing this article, is it self-comfort? I said: If it is self-comfort, I would not use such an embarrassing title: We are despicable sinners. Someone asked me: Don’t you admire Western culture very much? Why do you still write such things? I told him: Like it does not mean flattery. For example, if you like a woman, you will kiss her face and flatter a woman, you will kiss her face and then add her feet. There are some people in China now whose cultural reflection behavior is excessive and perverted. I just want to slap these people. I will slap this person as much as I can. There are two views of this person:

1. It is said that the ugly phenomenon that is common in human history is unique in Chinese history, and then it is argued that Chinese culture is inferior.

2. The second is to describe the phenomenon of low national quality in developing countries as the Chinese people’s bad character, and then prove that the Chinese are inferior nations.

After China has experienced the impact of Western civilization, some people often reflect on the political and cultural issues of their nation. This is a good thing, and it is undeniable that many of these reflective people are those who contribute to China's progress. However, our reflections have also seen some extreme things:

The complete denial of traditional culture. The Chinese traditional culture almost all called "feudal dregs". It even led to a great tragedy of breaking the four olds. The comprehensive veto of Chinese history. It is especially true that this argument still exists. It is ridiculous to think that it is all denied by history. The outdated extreme leftist thought appeared, which was nothing more than a sign. It was originally called overthrowing feudalism, but now it is called bravery and shame.

I can tell such people that there is a big difference between being brave and being brave and being brave and being shameless, just like gentlemen and rogues, warriors and clowns! In history, humans have at least 5 large-scale destruction of culture. These 5 destruction have a common feature: they believe that there is a problem with culture, they are garbage, devils, and so they destroy it.

1. After believing in Catholicism, the Romans crazily destroyed ancient Greek and Roman culture, demolished temples, smashed statues of gods, and banned the Olympic Games. Reason - God is the only god, and the others are evil spirits. (Think of culture that have problems with everything)

2: The Spanish said that Native American culture is a "devil" and is destroying it. (Think of the problem of culture)

3: German fascism. (Think of culture and everything)

Four: *Destroy the Four Old Movement. (Think of culture and everything)

5: The Taliban blows up the Bamiyan Buddha. (Think of culture and everything)

I once asked a person who likes to curse traditional Chinese culture: "In ancient China, modern times, are we sorry for the ancients? Or are they sorry for us?" He slapped the table with shame and helplessness and said, "Hey! We sorry for our ancestors!" So I asked again: "Relay race, our ancestors are ahead, our future generations are behind, are our future generations qualified to scold our ancestors? The answer is: "No." This reminds me of what some politicians said in front of Emperor Chaliman when Germany was defeated: "We are despicable.

Sinners!" Look at China today, those warriors who cursed their ancestors, those warriors who refused to say that China's backwardness was their own responsibility, those warriors who argued that the Chinese nation was an inferior nation, those warriors who argued that Chinese culture was an inferior culture, those warriors who kept mocking the little feet, eight-legged essays, braids, eunuchs, but dared not criticize the "foreign garbage"... Their bravery was all wiped out by that deep self-blame words. Therefore, I dare to say boldly that the true meaning of bravery and shame lies in admitting that we are despicable sinners

1. The wavering of my thoughts

To describe the ugliness of world history as the unique ugliness in Chinese history, then to prove that Chinese culture is an inferior culture. This kind of person is similar to idiots. Many years ago, probably when I was in high school, a book and a TV series were more popular at that time. The name of the book was Bai Yang from Taiwan, and the TV series was called, and the script was written by Su Shuyang. The ideas promoted are similar. In general, it compares Chinese traditional culture to a dirty "sauce jar", and attributes the reason for China's backwardness for more than 100 years to the culture created by our ancestors - especially Confucianism.

The book lists some of the dross of Chinese culture, such as: eight-legged essay, small feet, court sticks, eunuchs. Blind worship of idols, foolish loyalty and filial piety, imprisonment of thoughts, inequality of status of men and women. It also mentions the ignorance and cruel behavior of some Chinese people: for example, when they see Yi Zi and eat in the year of famine, burn Afang Palace, burn books and bury scholars, play power tricks, fight each other, and fight in the internal struggle, etc. So we concluded that China's backwardness lies in the inferiority of traditional culture, and we should give up traditional culture and accept Western civilization (actually, it is a complete Westernization). After reading these two works, we have a profound feeling, that is, China's traditional culture is really

It is almost worthless. Western literature is clearly brilliant and brilliant. Moreover, some of the examples mentioned in these two works make people seem to be talking about iron reality - Chinese culture represents barbarism, while Western culture represents progress! After watching it for a long time, a kind of idea that Western colonists were unsuccessful in the past: that the Chinese and the backward nations today are born inferior races, while the Europa - especially the Germans, are absolutely excellent nations. If China wants to make progress, it must move closer to Westerners in terms of thought, culture, ideology, writing structure and all aspects, and perhaps it can be a little more vital.

I agreed with these works at that time. To be honest, I agree! Because there were still many things I didn’t understand at that time... I was in high school and had only a slight understanding of China’s history. In my vague impression, it seemed that Bai Yang’s words were right. There were indeed many dark things in China. Moreover, the conservatism, corruption and autocracy in Chinese history left a deep impression on me, but there were so many scientists in the West, such as Einstein, Galileo, and Edison, as many writers in Hugo, Pushkin, and Shakespeare, as well as famous artists, Leonardo da Vinci and Van Gogh, and more importantly, the West has democracy, freedom and science.

At that time, I once said: We claim to have 5,000 years of civilization, but looking at it, almost all the things we use are invented by Westerners. I once agreed with a saying in "Heshang" "Don't deceive yourself anymore!" Yes, we should not always use the vast land of ancient civilizations to anesthetize ourselves, and admit our shortcomings and be brave and shameful. We should abandon traditional culture and the bad nature of the nation, so that China can have hope. Bai Yang once hoped that foreign friends, especially American friends, would help the Chinese people get rid of bad roots, and I agreed. Because at that time, in my eyes, the United States was a symbol of freedom and development and a symbol of civilization.

I did believe this view at that time, but at that time, there were still many things I didn't understand... I forgot one thing. When I admired Western civilization from the bottom of my heart, I didn't even take a good look at "World History".

After high school, I read the Bible, the Analects of Confucius, and Zhuangzi, and read some stories about Buddhist scriptures briefly. Later, I began to read the "Complete History of China". After work, I read the world history.

When looking at Chinese history, I still agree with Bai Yang and others, but I only had some questions. For example: "He Shang" once said: The Great Wall is a symbol of China's locked down the country. Is this true in history? It is said that Chinese people discriminate against and oppress women, but the Bible also clearly points out that women are dependents of men, and they must obey men's mercy, and even insult women as tyrants. Bai Yang said that after China established its dominance in Confucianism, there were no philosophers with new ideas, but Fan Zhen, Gu Yanwu, and Dai Zhen were all thinkers with independent opinions... However, I still basically agree with their thoughts. I just think that some of the so-called "bad natures" are not very accurate.

When looking at world history, I really didn’t have a deep feeling at first. I just felt that there were many Western countries and ethnic groups, Europe had many wars, and religious disputes were frequent... But at this time, I still had no bad impression of Western culture. However, my doubts increased: Bai Yang repeatedly mocked the Chinese people for having a eunuch system, but there were eunuchs in Rome and Turkey, and there was also the phenomenon of castration in European countries. Could it be that the eunuch production was not China’s patent? In addition, Bai Yang repeatedly mocked China’s court stick as “take off his pants and spanking”, but the Roman Empire also had the tradition of killing ministers with sticks, and even cutting off his head... (that is, the world-famous fascist torture) After reading carefully, I couldn’t help but be confused... civilized nations, excellent nations. These conclusions made in my mind about Europeans were shaken one by one!

2. Ugly human

When I saw the ancient civilization, I still appreciated the splendid culture of Greece and Rome. When I looked at the history of the medieval period, which continued until the history before the British Parliamentary War, to be honest, I can't bear to see that there were such despicable intrigues in human history, such crazy destruction of civilization, and such beastly deeds and scandals that even the most barbaric and chaotic tyrants in the East could not do!

★Destruction

I once said, "Chinese people destroy culture, such as Xiang Yu burned down Afang Palace, Dong Zhuo destroyed Chang'an and Luoyang, and foreign countries did not have such behavior!" But I was wrong. Now I know: to describe the ugliness of world history as the unique ugliness in Chinese history, and then argue that Chinese culture is an inferior culture. Such people are similar to idiots.

In ancient times, when Western Rome was destroyed, the Goths, or a Germanic branch, burned buildings in Rome, and 45,000 houses were destroyed. 1,800 palaces were burned and treasures were stolen. All gold, silver, treasures and prisoners of war became burial objects of the Goth leader Alaric, and books and cultural relics were smashed and destroyed. Even if the 100 palaces reached the previous Afang Palace, the amount of damage to the Goths was 18 Afang Palace, which was an annoying astronomical figure! The astronomical figures formed by the destruction of Europeans were far more than these...

In 1618, it was still a German. The blood of quasi-Mongols flowed in this blood vessel, but some people called it a natural excellent, purebred nation (actually Hitler claimed to be a purebred), and shamelessly raised a butcher knife to his own culture and people. For religious disputes, the Germans invited the Danes and the Swedes in 30 years. Later, they called the Spanish and Russians, and called almost all the neighboring countries to open their own countries. What to do? Trade? Spread culture? No! It is destruction! It is massacre! Within 30 years, one-third of the German population died, and five-sixths of the buildings were destroyed. Germany's ancient civilization for nearly 2,000 years has almost become a unique skill. It was these excellent Germans who provoked World War II more than 300 years later. The destruction continues, and it is more serious and worse, and loses humanity every time!

Not only Germans, but people in other European countries are also very interested in cultural destruction, and their scale and far-reaching influence are amazing! The Dutch hated the Spanish rulers, so they used culture to exert their anger. They took out their means to destroy Indonesian civilization in one go, burning and smashing more than 5,500 churches, of which more than 300 were established in the early Roman era and had a history of nearly a thousand years. The Duke of Alpha in Spain was not outdone and took out their ancestors.

In the past, the means of extermination of Inca culture was razed Antwerp, the largest city in the Netherlands, to level the ground. Antwerp's fiscal revenue station was half of the Spanish treasury. To put it bluntly, the Spaniards destroyed their economic lifeline, which was hysterical, to put it bluntly, to be schizophrenia. It turned out that I thought that Europeans were just colonists destroying the culture of other regions. Later I realized that they would not even let go of their own culture: In 1687, Venice

The people used cannons to bombard the Temple of Bathon, which was known as the "Greece Treasure". After the 18th century, the great powers from Western Europe also came to rob, just like burning and robbing the Old Summer Palace! What a civilization-destructive nation! What is puzzling is that when the Romans annexed Gathagir, they clearly classified Gathagir as one of his provinces and made it part of the Roman Empire, and they had to set fire there for six days and six nights. It was really difficult to sprinkle salt around the city and destroy Gathagir's culture.

Metaphor... What's even more terrifying is that I knew that the Chinese had changed their sons to eat during the famine, and they felt very barbaric. Later I learned that during the Russians' expedition, the commander Boyakov [this man was a civil servant] led his subordinates to eat human flesh on the pretext of insufficient military rations, eating living people and corpses. From Moscow to the border of Heilongjiang, the food was so dark that it was dark that the earth and bones formed mountains... Speaking of this, I felt very tired. Because only a small part of the cases of Europeans destroying culture and destroying humans were discussed.

In European history, it is rare to see them destroy a palace - this is not a praising them. Europeans destroy culture, and on a small scale, they completely destroy a city, and on a large scale, they eliminate a nation's civilization!

What a good Roman city, the Gauls came, the Carthaginians came, the burning, the Goths came, the burning, the Romans governed themselves, and they were still burning! The Incas, the destruction of the Mayan civilization, the disasters brought by the Crusades, the civil strife and destruction of the Huguenot War, the bloody killing of the Husse War, the atrocities of France and Spain in Italy... If you want to fully understand the cultural achievements of the Western civilized people praised by Bo Yang and others, then you can watch it yourself, maybe you can watch it for three days and three nights, and you can't finish it.

★Rieties

I used to think that there are many Chinese traitors, including Qin Hui, Wang Jingwei, and Yuan Shikai. Who did not sell their country? They also instigated the foolish monarch to kill national heroes such as Yue Fei and Yuan Chonghuan. Therefore, the Chinese people have poor quality and cultural problems. No wonder they were bullied and ruled.

But I was wrong.

People who argue that they have many traitors in their own nationality are traitors themselves.

Not to mention the fascists seized the armies of those European countries during World War II, nor to say that the Turks organized Christians to ravage Europe.

The Germans I mentioned just now opened the country's doors and allowed foreigners to invade themselves, for the sake of religious disputes. If the British king called mercenaries from Italy and Germany to the British Isles to suppress Kate's peasant uprising, it was a strange idea that the Queen Mother Cixi joined forces with British and French soldiers stationed in China to suppress the Taiping Army uprising. Although it was a traitor, it was not enough to go all the way to "invite" thousands of miles. In contrast, among the "brothers and sisters" who traitored the country, the British King seemed to have no shame or personality.

Alaric invaded Rome, and Rome's national hero Sticregor resisted bravely and was killed by the Roman monarch (and a wise and disabled person). When Joan of Arc defended France, he was sold to the British by the people he defended for 40,000 francs. This was a bad method for the gangsters to take. And it was disgusting!

Did the French sell their national heroes as bitches?! Czech general Wallenstein fought against the Danish invasion for the German emperor, and the ended up being tricked into the palace and shot with poisonous arrows - the same rogue method. Yue Fei was killed and falsely charged. Wallenstein's death was really a coward! When Hannibal was executed by the king he defended, he sighed: "What a person who scared the Romans is about to die!" The Punic War lasted for a hundred years, and poisoned the national guards at the most critical moment of the war. Their civilization was truly evident.

As for the more ridiculous thing, the war between Rome and Persia was the first three times. Regardless of the victory or defeat, the proud Romans "gracefully" paid a lot of gold to the Persian Empire. The Byzantine Empire seemed too rich, so they handed over 21,000 pounds of gold, even Justinian was no exception.

Napoleon III was defeated during the French-Prussian War and was very attentive to the Prussian king who defeated him, which was irritating. His descendants continued the tradition he left behind. On the eve of World War II, French representatives betrayed the Czech Republic in Munich, thinking that the French, who had achieved peace, danced a cheerful group dance in front of the embassy. In the early days of World War II, when he watched his ally Polish soldiers attack Nazi tanks with their long hair and finally fell to their horses and died.

However, the French hid in the air-raid shelter and enjoyed it like a movie. When they arrived at the city of Paris, they were the French who felt very good, who chose Betan and Lavar, and completely betrayed themselves. Then, did France achieve peace? No! Their Chinese were armed by fascists, acted as French traitors, invaded the Soviet Union, and turned into cannon fodder... The above are the ugly faces of European traitors! But it is only part of them.

★Torture

In the past, I thought that Chinese people were good at torture and murder. But I was wrong. Now I know: to describe the cruelty of world history as a unique cruelty in Chinese history, and then argue that Chinese culture is an inferior culture. Such people are similar to idiots.

The most terrifying criminal law in China is "Lingchi", which uses a knife to cut the skin and flesh bit by bit on the human body, and then add a knife to the human heart. In "civilized" Europe, the Holy See did not use a knife, but a blunt object - an oyster shell. Before the execution, they will cut off their hands and feet first, but after the execution, they will not repair the heart, and people will slowly struggle to die. (A Greek female geometrician was sentenced to this punishment) In France, melted lead water was poured on the human body bit by bit, and then used to clamp the skin and flesh piece by piece with tongs. Of course, before the torture, a layer of quicklime was sprinkled on the human body. As for torture such as digging eyes, cutting ears, dismembering five horses, and lighting sky lanterns, it is even more common in European history, especially when the uprising of Tuwabian peasant in Germany was suppressed.

What makes me even more amused is that during the Thirty Years War, Europeans invented a "ittingle torture", that is, applying honey and salt to the soles of criminals' feet, allowing the sheep to lick it, so that the criminals laughed to death. It was a very "smart" creation! Xu Yunfeng was once threatened by pro-American Kuomintang officers in Zhazidong: "Can you resist the hundreds of punishments invented by Americans?" It seems that Europeans' research on torture has continued to modern society and is still tireless. That is, in the actual record of the Vietnam War, all kinds of torture in the United States are also modern, which is also called progress.

★Confinement

In the past, I thought that the Chinese people imprisoned ideas and destroyed culture, such as the prevalence of eight-legged essays and the emergence of *. Now I know that China is really a slight comparison with Europeans in imprisoning ideas.

In the fifth century AD, Constantine the Great declared Catholicism the state religion. From then to around the seventeenth century, Europe did not allow printing (which was equivalent to cutting off the root of culture), scientific research on "heretics", religious debates, and cultural and artistic creations were not allowed. In Spain, people who argued about the Bible, men buried alive, and women burned alive. In Germany, one added: after the heresy was executed, the property belonged to the informer. In France, in the early 17th century, if you dare to hold a piece of paper with printed fonts, you would be sentenced to death. Germany's anti-herethical law and the Inquisition were famous in Europe, and the nations followed the example.

It was easy to be Martin Luther to implement the Reformation, but Calvin, the Geneva ‘Pope’, still did not allow singing, dancing, playing games, wearing beautiful clothes, and ban music, and cruelly suppressed the Anbaptism. European people, who had been a Catholic Church for generations, could not read the Bible. This is an extremely strange phenomenon, because the Bible can only be copied into books in two words, Hebrew and ancient Greek, and they could not understand it even if they read it. It was not until the Reformation that the European people saw the Bible written in their own national texts for the first time. Such a nation that confines thoughts and destroys culture is helpless in the face of the Black Death, and no wonder they are illiterate everywhere, so that they only have more than 200 years of history in founding medicine.

There are books and scholars in China that burn and bury the Confucians, but Europe can be said to have no books to burn and no scholars to bury.

In China, I think there will be no armed conflict between the Legalists and Confucianism, and the struggle between the Lu and Kings and Cheng and Zhu schools of Neo-Confucianism is limited to the scope of debate. At most, some Confucian scholars will have a fierce fight. Although China has many religions and many beliefs, there is no religious war. What kind of religion does China do not always use doctrine as the basis and imposes a death penalty on the people.

Death penalty! Death penalty! Death penalty! Europe has inexplicably established many death penalty items.

Hus and Jerome were sentenced to death for opposing the exploitation of the church, Bruno was sentenced to death for agreeing with Copernicus's doctrine, Thomas Moore was sentenced to death for refusing to recognize the British king as a religious leader (he began to plan to take out his internal organs and fed them to animals), and Servette was roasted to death by the reformer Calvin because of a new discovery in the blood circulation.

Companella was imprisoned for 27 years for writing a "Sun City" and made contributions to the country. Cervantes, who gave his arm in the war, was deprived of his church, lost his right to work, and eventually died in a slum tragically! As for Rabelay, he escaped from the thugs by chance, and his friend who helped him publish "The Legend of the Giant" died under a stick! Even Michelangelo was almost sued by the church because he had a "heretic" creative tendency in "The Judgment of the Doomsday"...

In ancient times, Europeans killed Plato, Socrates and Aesop, and in the Middle Ages they became more and more damaging the elites of civilization. European civilization, you have farmers who sow seeds for you, but do you have soil? If it is said to grow and grow, it will be hundreds of years later. Before that, how many times have you been burned, destroyed and extincted! The eight-legged essay in China was established for only 600 years, while the extreme religious rule in Europe was 1,200 years. If it were to destroy civilization and imprison their ability to imprison ideas, we Eastern people had to admit defeat. Because if people like Li Shizhen, Xu Guangqi, Cao Xueqin, Zu Chongzhi, Li Bai, Du Fu, Ma Jun, and Sun Simiao had probably died hundreds of times in Europe, let alone Shi Nai'an, the author of "Water Margin"!

★Evil Lord

There were once some bastard rulers in China that were never seen in a century. Emperor Yang of Sui, Emperor Wuzong of Ming Dynasty, Qin II, Jie, Zhou, and Huan Ling... But please believe me, if there are only a handful of such thugs and beast-like rulers in China, then in Europe, they can find many similar people, and their extremely debauchery and violentness are far superior to those of China's villains! The ugliness of world history are regarded as the unique ugliness in Chinese history, and then argue that Chinese culture is an inferior culture. Such people are similar to hooligans.

I don't want to list the 12 foolish lords in France one by one, and there are endless topics about them.

The Roman emperor Nero, a monster born to marry his niece, was inspired to see his mother kill his father when he was young. When he was young, he became bloodthirsty. In order to seize power, he first sank his mother's boat. Because he was not dead, he even sent warriors to chase him. He stabbed his pregnant wife to death with a sword. In addition to squandering and killing indiscriminately, he suddenly burned the entire Rome with a whim. The fire continued for days and countless people died. He stood on the balcony and laughed. As for the reasons for the arson, there was no accurate statement. It can only be attributed to "the mentality is not normal". There were also great destruction caused by war in the East, but such inexplicable destruction may be difficult to find two in world history.

Grakra, the Romanian great master, did something even more ridiculous. Seeing that Central Asian merchants did not take off their hats, they cruelly nailed the hats of Central Asian merchants to their heads. In order to show their majesty, dozens of tall iron stamps were inserted at the door of the palace, and the living people were put on like barbecue, and they changed new people every day, called upright justice. In fact, it can only show that he is a mentally abnormal person, and Queen Margrit III actually owned a swimming pool made of the blood of a girl under the age of 12. In the end, all the civil and military ministers with girls in their family fled. I don’t know if their cruelty is comparable to that of King Zhou of China, but I know that King Zhou owns a wine pool and a meat forest, which is his luxury. Relying on suppressing and resisting, it is a symbol of his cruelty. Grakra’s human meat forest

The human blood pool with Margrit only makes me feel cruel and luxurious than Zhou—especially their "imagination" of human nature! In the past, when I saw the daughter of Emperor Zhongzong of Tang poisoning him to death, I felt that it was inhumane, but when I saw the Roman emperor Sevi was beaten to death by his daughter and son-in-law, immediately threw the body on the street and made a fuss in a carriage, I couldn't help but be amazed: What a civilized nation! Even if China has evil deeds of killing fathers and regicides, there is no such crazy, shameless, and no conscience or blatant examples! Although Ivan Thunder Emperor was great, he could not change the traditional wildness of Europeans and eventually smashed his crown prince with a scepter (Repin's oil painting Ivan Thunder Emperor was shown). Caesar was stabbed by his illegitimate son Bai Lude...

When I saw that Sima Zhong, a mentally retarded emperor appeared in Chinese history, I found ridiculous and shameful. But when I learned less than half of European history, I found a group of mentally retarded emperors or kings. In addition to the aforementioned Gracra, Charles VI of France was mentally ill, Tsar Fedor of Russia was a fool with a fetus, Claudius, the Roman monarch, was polio and idiot, and the other Roman emperor, Honoliu, was relatively slight sober, because he had not forgotten to kill the national hero of Stilagor, who defended Rome, and implicated it!

★Luxurious

When I heard that Emperor Yang of Sui raped his own sister, I felt it was outrageous. Looking back at the actions of Europeans, I couldn't help but laugh. The Greeks had a great tradition of intermarriage between brothers and sisters (Cleopatra's husband was his younger brother), while in Rome, uncles could marry niece, and half-siblings could get married. As for the Greek legend, the civilized deeds of a prince killing his father, marrying his mother, and having four children with his mother can reveal the deep roots of European incest culture.

Such incest habits seem to have become a long tradition. Hitler's first lover, Jili, was his niece. I don't know if it was a continuation of Roman civilization in modern society?! I saw a comment on the emperor before, saying that Emperor Wuzong was the biggest bastard emperor in Chinese history, because he committed adultery with the wife of the minister. In Europe, since the emperor did not allow him to take concubines, there were common sexual mischiefs in the palaces of various countries. It may not be too much to say that the European court was a wife swapping club. Even the effect was higher and lower, and finally,

In the 10th century AD, a folk "culture" was formed that was steaming and lustful, and men and women lived in a mixed manner. If the Emperor Wuzong of the Ming Dynasty was really measured by the standards of bastards, then the European monarchs became bastards one after another. Of course, their tradition should be called: bastard tradition. Elizabeth I was the product of this tradition. The great Napoleon was full of green hats, and the excellent queen of Peter Snow raised a large number of male pets in the harem, and the powerful Ivan Thunder Emperor attempted to rape his daughter-in-law. The infatuated Queen Marley avenged her lover's revenge and murdered her husband... Such a noble palace that was chaotic must have been due to the influence of this distant culture.

If Caesar did not have an improper relationship with the king Nicomes when he was on the mission to Asia Minor, he would still be worthy of my admiration. Because Caesar had many titles, lifelong dictator, head of state, etc.... But after Asia Minor came back, he had another title: the queen's rival. Please take a look at this lyrics that satirizes Caesar's homosexuality: Caesar conquered Gaul, Nicomes conquered him. Caesar bravely reunited because he conquered Rome. Nicomes did not reunited, but conquered Caesar!

★Conspiracy

Some people say: Europeans are open and honest because after conflicts arise, they do not intrigue, but use duels. I don’t know if Chinese hooligans draw death draws from each other (the form is very similar to duels) also belong to the kind of open and honest one. I want such people to see how Europeans are "open and honest".

Alexander, the ruler of Greece and Macedonia, was merciless to those who violated him. He first killed his mentor Aristotle's nephew, then shot him and stabbed his savior to death (Europeans always like to do it themselves). His ability to kill heroes was never inferior to Zhu Yuanzhang. What was particularly shameful is that when he killed his friends who had grown up with him, he pretended to be crazy and stupid, pretended to drink "Divine Water" and was confused. When he killed his father's old subordinates, he actually sent assassins to assassinate - this was a trick that Zhu Yuanzhang could not do. Alexander was known as the king of the four directions of the universe and the pharaoh of Egypt, but if he was "open and honest", I really wouldn't agree.

The Pope is a role respected by all nations in Europe. The monarchs and kings of Europe both call it "dads" in a friendly spoken language. It is these good European fathers who forged an imperial edict in the 8th century AD to deceive European countries to sell land to him regularly or irregularly. The fraud lasted for more than 700 years before it was exposed by the historian of Naples Valla. The papacy was a labor reformer, and the fraud was too long and the wealth was too great. There is a saying in the labor reformer team that said: I would rather give you ten bastards than one frauder. Pope, the father of all the kings in Europe, how do I judge you?!

Shameful fraud is not just this! In the 16th and 17th centuries, the church sold a large number of "exempts" to the people, that is, those who bought the excuses can ascend to heaven. It is okay to deceive the people, but they also regard the saints they respect as human beings: they just take a broken blanket, say that it was used by Christ, and find a broken headscarf, saying that it was worn by the Virgin Mary. The most shameless thing is to use the bones of the Lord, sheep and other beasts to pretend to be the remains of St. Peter, and sell one of them with five gold coins. If the First Pope had a spirit in heaven, he would probably cry in heaven. As for selling a pile of chicken feathers as angel feathers, it would be even more difficult for them to do it.

In Germany, there were four peasant uprisings in more than 40 years, including Shoe Rebellion (Shoes represent poor peasants). The lords and jazz deceived the peasants, pretended to sign a peace treaty, then dismantled the peasant army, and finally carried out bloody suppression. The peasant peasants broke out twice in the Tuwabian and Frankian peasants. The German rulers used this method repeatedly: signing the peace treaty - disbanding the rebel army - massacre peasants. The Chinese still knew that the monarchs of Europe had no jokes, and the shamelessness of Europe had reached the extreme.

Similarly, similar situations have occurred in Britain and France, but the method has changed. It has been to lure the leaders of the peasant army to negotiate, and then immediately arrest and kill. They treat the leader of the Zachary uprising, Kahler, and Taylor, the British peasant leader. Haitian independent leader Tousan Louveduer was also arrested by Napoleon by lure--The openness of Europeans? Where is it reflected? Is it reflected in Dantes's openness and stole Pushkin's wife first.

, Was he killed Pushkin in duel? What is most surprising is that there was a fake tsar in Russia. In Russia, in order to obtain power, the emperor's uncle Isky actually found a handsome, tall, handsome and suave gangster from Lithuania to pretend to be the dead prince Dimitri, who had been dead for many years. Moreover, the fake tsar appeared twice in Russia. It is a super comedy in the history of the world's palace and a "miracle" that makes people laugh and cry! There are countless examples in civilized Europe...

Ivan the thunder emperor killed his uncle and the emperor's uncle, and the prince was killed. His mother was murdered by powerful ministers of the family. His son was assassinated by Poris, and Poris died in a mess. The palace of an era was so dark.

Over the past 1,000 years, 20 popes have died in vain, and the causes of 10 popes have remained unknown. This is the openness and integrity of Europe.

Unprecedented, unimaginable fraud, scandal, cruel, absurd and comics have appeared in Europe many times. Do you want to see a history that is several times darker, terrifying, disgusting, and ignorant than Chinese history? Then I recommend world history to you.

Don't treat yourself as the only ugly thing:

The same sentence: I would say that the common ugliness of mankind is the unique ugliness of one's own nation, and then argue that Chinese culture is an inferior culture - this is meaningless reflection, and its means are similar to idiots.

Speaking of this, I don’t want to talk more about Western history. I just hope that those who believe in Bai Yang or the ideas promoted in "He Shang" will use their brains, read some books, read some world history, or books on religion and philosophy in the East and the West. If you find it difficult to read, then you can also read children’s books compiled by Mr. Chen Bixiang. You can also read children’s books on European classical culture. In short, I hope that you will not be confused, self-contained, make comments, complain randomly, and treat yourself as a person with progressive thoughts and very personality. So much so that you say: “The Koreans are inferior nations, and the Koreans are excellent nations.”

In addition, some Chinese people have such remarks, such as: Chinese people are very capable of having children and can do nothing. Also, Chinese people are not good at race.
To be continued...