There are a lot of similar questions in the comment area. If you don’t reply, it seems impolite and a little annoying to reply. So just open a post.

Before estoppel, I have to declare that this is only my personal opinion, and it does not mean that it is necessarily correct, nor does it mean that it is the only correct one.

The post is not to attract war, but to explain my views and perspectives on the problem.

When shaping the protagonist, I actually thought a lot.

First of all, the environment.

I think the environment has a great impact on people. To give a simple and real example, my hometown is divided into new urban area and old urban area, and the two are about 10 different places.

The former is built because of heavy industries such as steel.

People in these two districts seem to have obvious differences in quality. Pedestrians cross the road in the new district (there are sidewalk lines, but there are no traffic lights), and there are often cars.

Stop and let pedestrians pass by. When pedestrians pass by, they often nod their heads and question the driver. However, if there are traffic lights in the old district, they will not look at them, snatch them, and scold each other.

The vehicle is always driving in a regular manner, with various interspersed and reversed in the old areas.

Is it really because the people in the new district have high quality, while the people in the old district have low quality? In fact, there are differences, and there are not many differences, and the environmental impact or atmosphere impact is very important.

Important. You respect me one foot, I respect you one foot. This is the atmosphere of the new district. It is not polite if anyone crosses the road and makes a loud noise in public places.

It looks very rustic and embarrassing. Just pay attention to it yourself. The counterexample is the old area, your time is precious and you will be able to be rich? I will be killed by you. I will be killed by you.

It's a danger, it's your turn to lose a few dollars, and you can buy your life for tens of thousands of dollars.

Okay, the importance of the environment has been explained. Let’s see its impact on the protagonist.

His living environment is very extreme, and it is an upgraded version of the new and old areas I gave.

In the Vientiane Space System, the high-end system is very new, and the atmosphere among the reincarnators is very old.

In the adventure world that we often go to, in most cases, high-end systems are relatively new, while those who reincarnate are extremely old.

These are to explain one point of view, that is, a civilized society is built by order, regardless of whether it is reasonable or not, even a slave

In the internal society, if the slaves do not rebel, it basically means that they can still tolerate it, and the overall social structure is still stable. This is the general trend.

As a reincarnation person, you can be unparalleled and cut off all those who are dissatisfied, or you want to crush an ants

It can also slaughter people from a world, but you have to admit that you are doing this against the trend.

The natives in the adventure world, whoever pretends to me will kill his whole family. I am so honest, I will never take revenge overnight. Is it okay? Of course, I

Since ancient times, blood has been splattered for more than five steps. Modern kitchen knife chops people. It is probably very pleasant to cut people at the moment of chopping people. The anger erupts, and the revenge club

Will it be? I can't cut off fully armed hawks, and I can't cut off their children? I bully the weak, which is similar to the reincarnation samsara crushing the natives.

Many modern mainstream online articles are essentially the same, challenging power, challenging inherent order, and facing the wind, some even criticized justice.

Daqi said that he had reason to do this at the moral high point. Some people simply said this, just rolling up their sleeves and doing it.

Dark wind.

I can't come, I don't think it's because I'm timid, nor do I think I need to write something educational. It's not that high-end, I think

Most readers have the most basic discernment ability, and there is no need for online articles to understand the principles of life.

The main reason why I can't come is because I personally think that this kind of person is the protagonist who is not convinced. He has reached a certain level of funnyness. I am pinching my nose and holding it in a hurry.

, I can't imagine what their thinking was.

In my opinion, the background of all the winds are slight and cold, and the background is very difficult. There is no way, in the near despair, just exchange your life for life.

Treat yourself as barefoot and treat yourself as tiles.

This is very realistic, with many dark curtains on your head, it is so difficult to penetrate this ceiling.

But we are in the world of online literature, and we want to fantasize. Why is this kind of rustic bully's life-threatening idea? Is it really a deceased person who has been a deceased for a long time? It will cause blood to splatter five steps after five steps.

, look out of the grass, and be unparalleled?

I want to say, you have to love yourself, those protagonists who are angry and angry, you have to treat yourself as jade, you have to treat yourself as your daughter's son, don't

While shouting that you will die if you are provoked, you will die, while letting the author pass the lucky break for you again and again. You have some brains.

Among the basic rationality I need, fighting to support war is an outdated and unreasonable funny idea. I often see a certain protagonist killing the enemy.

Dead, and then found a lot of money, a lot of magic weapons, magic medicines, etc. Oh my God, these are all human-shaped treasure chests

What a strange thing, is there any living Lei Feng? I use rags, money and things don’t turn into strength, wear a sub-grade product, and hold a bag of treasures to find someone to fight

, Isn’t this just dedication? Tell others openly, come and rob me, right?

There is also a kind of war that cannons are seized, and how many weapons are long and short. Without firing a few shots in total, all the weapons and ammunition of a division will be seized.

I can't imagine that situation. What I can imagine is that I have to hold a gun, my back is straighter than others, and I am very brave. Who would have to do it?

Playing charge for me, unless there are no bullets, I don’t believe that I can’t kill those mobile targets. If the tenacious will has such an important role, then 3,000

The believer ruled the world, and now the earth's ball should be the representative of Allah's world or the Pope of the Holy See.

The effect of infinitely increasing will, ignoring the fact that more fights less, fighting second and third-rate troops also suffer heavy casualties, and exchanging lives for victory. Just listen to the official hype

How few people are there and how bad are the weapons and equipment? I don’t know that even if I am surrounded by several times, I will fight with less and more, and when I really start fighting, I will often look at it correctly.

Opportunity: destroy a part of the enemy with superior forces, and then continue to move, rely on the intelligence advantages brought by a good mass base, find opportunities, and then

Destroy one, and a small victory is accumulated little by little to big victory. During the whole process, many informed masses and brave officers and soldiers died. These were all ignored.

People brag about it because there is a political need, so they can't criticize themselves, right? Everyone has no confidence in the ruling people, so they still play a game? This is not good for the factory.

Is it difficult for workers to accept the same truth when recruiting workers to invest?

Okay, that's all for the complaints. Let's continue to talk about character design.

There is no treasure gift to make the protagonist rich, there is no villain who always happens to be stronger than the protagonist, and the protagonist is slapped in the face, nor is it the legendary Chang Shen

The Kai-style transport captain sent guns and cannons. Even if there were, it was occasionally, not normal. This is my basic rationality bottom line. I can't write that

I don't know how they got to that position before the protagonist fucked them. They only know how to lew parents and put big pie on their heads

When I go up, I will only eat the piece in front of me and finally starve myself to death?

The protagonist of this book is the high-end among the reincarnation people. A simple understanding is that it is the best.

I am not such a person myself, otherwise I would not have written online articles, I could only earn some money for cigarettes, and I was scolded by others.

I can only imagine what a superior person should be like.

I think that as a superior person, you must first know how to employ people, and secondly, you must know how to take advantage of the situation. This is a good idea.

To be honest, you can’t make a fortune by yourself, you must exploit others and let others make money for you.

From this perspective, I was lazy when writing. Because living people get along with living people is very complicated, constantly interacting and constantly causing problems.

, solve the problem. I think American dramas can often explain this well. Each character has his own opinions and ideas. Various collisions are insignificant.

A small character may not succeed, but can be bad at critical moments.

I don't want to write this, I feel I can't control it, and I'm too tired. So I use the concept of iron-blooded insect swarm, and I don't need to have my own individual cognition, it's all the same

For the crazy believer, the will of the dominant ruler is the goal of the swarm. He leads a group of intelligent biological robots and thus exploits it.

Secondly, the unheard saying of taking advantage of the situation is that I use my official position and the law to attack others, but I am above them.

This aspect of modern society is more implicit, mainly because the rulers consider the increasingly fragile psychology of being learned and find ways to blur the concept.

It was clear in ancient times. During the Mongolian rule, the Han people were two-legged sheep, which was lower than the status of large animals. They were ruled for more than a hundred years. They were very short-lived, but

On the other hand, how many modern people have a life expectancy of over 100? After I die, no matter how much floods are involved. Anyway, when I am alive, who dares to show off, shoot directly and accompany me to the head

The mule family members have to find me a pig or two or a equivalent amount of money.

This is how the rule of foreign races is, and the conscience of the original race? The Han people expressed dissatisfaction. Go through the information at that time and you will know that the difference in status can bring about

What kind of advantages and disadvantages? If you sue a powerful person, no matter whether you have any reason or not, you have to be beaten or rolled on the board first. You will trade casually like a piglet...

Why is the ruler so awesome? Isn’t it just using the rules to win people? And it has been taken for thousands of years, and it is estimated that it will also win in the future.

Find ways to become rulers, so that other rulers can’t take you like a slut, but can only play another set of hidden rules that we negotiate or agree on with each other

Then, I think this is the minimum wisdom.

Imagine that in the world of Vientiane Gate, if it is a steward, is it below one person and above ten thousand people? In addition to bowing to the will of Vientiane Gate, the rest

All reincarnators can change their ways to control them.

Adventure world, directly manipulating the official and the army, can it provide a lot of convenience? If you say curfew, you will be curfew, if you say martial law, you will be martial law, and if you say martial law, you will be martial law. Some are cannon fodder

.

If you have to go against the wind, let the army become an enemy, and be bombarded by various light and heavy firepower, you will show your awesomeness? You must have the ability to not kill you.

When there is no, is it safer and more cost-effective to disguise yourself as an officer? Isn’t this just taking advantage of the situation?

Okay, after talking about the basic abilities of superiors who exploit people, use the existing order and legal institutions, and serve themselves. Let’s talk about style and attitude.

Exploiting others and using power and money. These two things alone determine that the ruler has shit on his butt, directly or indirectly. However, being a ruler

It also requires basic skills and professional ethics.

For example, don't tear your face.
To be continued...