Li Zhongxin knows more than anyone how important it is to optimize the business environment and give a good business environment for enterprises. Zhongxin Company encountered various difficulties in the early stages.

For example, under normal circumstances, Zhongxin Supermarket chain, tobacco, alcohol, sugar and tea should be supplied normally. However, because the prices of some products in Zhongxin Supermarket chain are purchased by Zhongxin Company itself, the prices are higher than those of other state-owned enterprises.

The shopping mall prices are lower, so the tobacco and alcohol company will directly cut off the tobacco and alcohol company's tobacco and alcohol company.

After the tobacco and alcohol were cut off, Zhongxin Company also said in a preface that it was a sensational and disturbing object, and it required the industrial and commercial administration departments and other departments to intervene in the investigation. Such a trend must not last long.

Therefore, Li Zhongxin believes that the market must exert its own strength and change according to market changes, rather than controlling market operations by the country or some companies.

Only by further improving the business environment is the hard truth for development.

With a better business environment, the vitality of the market and the creativity of the society will be released more.

The marketization of state-owned enterprises was the operating contract responsibility system. The operating contract system implemented by state-owned enterprises in the mid-to-late 1980s was indeed an innovation in the enterprise system, which promoted the ownership and operation of state-owned enterprises to a certain extent.

The separation of power has mobilized the enthusiasm of enterprises and individuals.

However, since the contracting system also does not touch the basic property rights system of the enterprise, it still has some difficult-to-overcome defects such as short-term behavior, and cannot adapt to the needs of state-owned enterprises to participate in market competition, making the contracting system unsustainable.

Therefore, some urban and rural collective enterprises took the lead in trying to shareholding, which gave great inspiration to state-owned enterprises that intend to carry out ownership reform. Against this background, small and medium-sized state-owned enterprises in some places have also begun to try shareholding.

At this time, many cities began to choose a few large and medium-sized state-owned enterprises to conduct joint-stock pilot projects.

However, as far as the national situation is concerned, the shareholding reform of state-owned enterprises during this period was still limited to small and medium-sized enterprises. Not only were there a small number and scattered distribution, but it was not a standard shareholding system.

During the state-owned enterprise ownership reform during this period, the ownership reform of state-owned enterprises was mainly not very standardized shareholding system, and more radical privatization was still rare. Governments at all levels were gradually supporting the exploration of shareholding system of state-owned enterprises.

And form a consensus.

Although there has not been a clear policy direction at the central level, enterprises implementing a shareholding system more from the purpose of financing and less from changing the corporate governance structure. Even so, the shareholding system exploration of state-owned enterprises during this period still allows

People see hope for future reform of state-owned enterprises.

The dividends from decentralization and concessions to reform of the business contract system were released without much time, and the operating performance of state-owned enterprises tended to deteriorate since the early 1990s.

At this time, the leaders realized that to maintain the dominant position of the state-owned economy, preserve and increase the value of state-owned assets, and prevent the loss of state-owned assets, the only way to reform the ownership system of state-owned enterprises is to a deeper level.

In 1995, Lao Yi proposed to establish a useful exploration of the modern enterprise system at this time, saying that large and medium-sized state-owned enterprises that meet the conditions should be reorganized into sole state-owned companies, limited liability companies or shares according to their own different situations.

Co., Ltd. Generally, small state-owned enterprises can implement contracting and leasing operations, some can be reorganized into a joint-stock cooperative system, or they can be sold to collectives or individuals.

The reform and restructuring strategies for implementing corporatization of large state-owned state-owned enterprises and privatization of small and medium-sized state-owned enterprises have been initially formed.

Just like the soy products factory in Jiangcheng, such a soy products factory! In the 1970s and 1980s, it could be said to be one of the most popular enterprises in Jiangcheng. The employees in the factory have high benefits and can still eat.

Soy products that ordinary people cannot eat.

This matter has a great relationship with the national conditions back then. Soybeans are provided by the state. The soybeans are turned into big tofu, dried tofu, as well as some tofu soaking, etc. through machines.

Such a company can be regarded as a monopoly. After all, at that time, only the soybean products factory produced tofu and other things.

These things are all things you need to buy with tofu tickets. Without tofu tickets, you can't buy even if you have money.

At that time, tofu tickets were very precious, and every household bought tofu and other soy products.

Therefore, the soy products factory is a state-owned enterprise that is absolutely profitable. However, with the steps of reform and opening up, this soy products factory is no longer able to do it.

Let’s not talk about the aging equipment of soy products factories. People no longer have a single life like they used to be. Buying a piece of tofu is already a good thing, and more people sell tofu.

Tofu, handmade tofu is much more delicious than large machinery such as soy products factories. This is why people choose more, so they may not necessarily buy soy products factories.

Tofu and soy products.

Sales volume is less and money is earning less, but the employees of soy products factory have not decreased, and there are still many retirees who have no competitive vitality and the ability to make money. Such companies will live no matter what.

Can't go on.

Therefore, it is normal for a company like this to get rid of its burden. No matter what business model it uses, it has no longer achieved the glory of the past. It is just a decline. Nothing else, even if it is a contract and shareholding reform.

It's useless, either.

What should I do with the wages of employees of this company and retired workers? Is it the country continues to bear it or what?

Instead of leaving this soy products factory, it is better to sell this soy products factory, whether it is selling the venue or selling other things. In short, take out the company and let the employees of these companies have living expenses and food.

If those retired workers have a guarantee of their lives, then even if the reform of state-owned enterprises is successful.

Such an enterprise should be reformed from the perspective of the country or from the perspective of the people and should be sold. In this way, if the country revitalizes the country's assets, the country will no longer have to do such a company.
Chapter completed!