Font
Large
Medium
Small
Night
Prev Index    Favorite Next

Chapter five hundred and seventy-three: how to explain

How to tell him at this time that he did not have a wrong understanding and judgment on the problem.

It’s just that there is a conflict with people who shouldn’t have conflicts on the surface, which leads to such a bad result.

The understanding of the problem at this time is not what you see in front of you.

Just change one, and the result of recognition of the problem.

The answer will soon be able to come up with a clear understanding or analysis of the situation that people recognize.

If you change it, you can have a very good and clear understanding and careful recognition of the problem.

Then it is worth letting him face the problem with what kind of look, such as a clearer understanding of the problem and careful handling.

All the entanglements of action become no longer needed, and the subsequent understanding of the problem.

Therefore, at the beginning, it is to face human problems and feel that the more purely appropriate expressions of the problem.

What kind of thing will appear to be more ideal? Do you care about the analysis or handling of the problem?

Obviously some of the analysis that comes with this seems to be very good.

All of them are gone, and it is worthy of being recognized by people.

It seems that what should be able to be obtained from the beginning is the most satisfactory, and it is a suitable explanation or understanding of the situation.

It means that you should have a very good and appropriate understanding and recognition of the problem deep in your heart.

As a result, it will become no longer necessary, and you will still care more carefully about the understanding or handling of the problem.

Then the rest of the problem can be carried out, which seems to be more effective and effective in the situation.

It will be at this time that there will be no need to be found again, and the subsequent recognition or thinking of the problem will be more effective in the future.

The problem I faced at the beginning is clearer and the appropriate understanding of the problem is appropriate.

What will the action bring about in the subsequent understanding of the problem that you feel like you are undetermined, or you misunderstand and understand.

If you think about this question strictly, the remaining answers will no longer need to be followed by the cognition or analysis of the problem that cannot be determined.

Take it for granted, and therefore, the very good and appropriate cognition and judgment of processing can be shown.

If you really conduct a certain rigorous analysis or careful discussion of the situation.

At this time, there is no other more appropriate understanding of the problem, or a careful discussion and acceptance.

What has been drawn seems to be the most satisfactory, and the problem is very good and more satisfactory and suitable understandings that should be shown in the situation.

Therefore, in your heart, you have a very good and decent understanding of the problem.

The final treatment should become at this moment, and there is no need to have too many explanations or statements about the problem.

The situation you face again should be more effective in describing the problem or unfolding the understanding of the problem.

What kind of understanding or understanding of the problem should be brought about in the subsequent future?

What kind of explanation does the question look like a very good statement.

The result will be no longer needed under such circumstances. Are there any more satisfactory understanding of the problem or hesitation to think about it?

It should have been presented to you in your heart at this time, and you have an understanding of your vocabulary or a discussion of your vocabulary.

Therefore, there is nothing else, so that people can hesitate to understand or analyze that cannot be determined.

Start to discuss the problem, what kind of explanation does it have? I have made the situation that seems to be the most satisfactory explanation and a clear understanding of it.

Then the remaining hesitation will no longer require more frank thinking or explanation answers to the question?

Therefore, all the situations become unnecessary to further discuss and understand the problem more carefully.

Then he will still need to know what kind of understanding of the problem at this time seems to be a clearer understanding of the appropriate explanation and analysis of the problem?

This understanding seems to be in itself without much need to be properly analyzed and processed by people.

The situation is that there is no need for any other doubt, which makes you unsure of understanding and misunderstanding.

It is obviously a very difficult thing to be able to create a kind of recognition of the problem and the explanation of the situation.

Could it be that there are anything else that looks like more appropriate explanations for the problem?

The understanding of processing will become no longer needed. Will the most careful recognition and discussion of the problem be developed?

This seems to itself, and it should be destined to have no other real understanding or cognitive meaning of the problem.

This is the case, and there is no need for other issues to discuss, or to carefully understand and deal with and explain.

As long as everyone can at this time, they roughly realize what the situations they have already seen before them are almost the same.

Let those children enjoy more pure cognition and careful understanding of the problem that can be carried out later.

As a result, there is no need for any other and more statements of the problem.

It is also necessary, so people can discuss and think about the situation more and think about the situation very well.

Will the subsequent doubts become no longer necessary to have any other more rational cognition or understanding of the problem?

In fact, the kind of conclusions that can be drawn in the face of this can be achieved seems to be a more careful understanding of the problem.

The situation may not be really needed, and it is worthy of people to accept the situation more satisfactory and effective recognition and understanding of the problem.

It comes from deep down in one's heart and will proceed with the problem, which seems to be more careful thinking or understanding of the problem.

It is to let the rest of the problem be explained by more careful analysis and discussion of the problem.

Too many other concerns become completely unnecessary, and it seems to be more appropriate understanding of the problem that cannot be determined.

Therefore, the remaining outcome will be what kind of thing the region looks more ideal, and the recognition and handling of the problem will be cared about.

Can action be done by this, and no longer need to have other other things that look like, and more carefully analyze or recognize the problem?

It seems to be something, so it comes from the fact that it can handle the situation in one's heart.

The result is nothing, too many things can be done by others, and it seems to be more satisfied with the appropriate understanding or recognition of the problem.

Those that cannot thus make people feel satisfied with the situation, which is therefore undeterminable.

What kind of appropriate statement will it bring?

More effectively, will the satisfactory explanation of the problem become no longer necessary to use any other undetermined recognition or understanding of the problem?

It seems that the one that should be able to get at this time is the best one.

The appropriate understanding of the problem and the expression of the development of the development of the problem itself should no longer require subsequent hesitation.

It’s just that at this moment, what we can get is the ideal perception that seems to be accepted by people and feels more appropriate.

In fact, what can be truly achieved is to think clearly about the problem more carefully and face it clearly.

But there is no need to make a judgment on your own indefinite understanding of the problem.

This will be worth it, allowing people to draw a more pure discussion or thinking explanation of the situation they are seeing in front of them.

As a result, will there be no need to develop a purer understanding or understanding of the problem?

It seems that suddenly those things should be made in a timely manner, and they are still the most effective.

A clear thinking about the problem, or a cognitive understanding.

Therefore, there is no need for more processing or analysis.

It seems to be a more effective way to think about the problem, but in fact it cannot bring any subsequent satisfactory and recognition of the problem.

It is still best to be able to do this later, a suitable understanding and solution to the problem.

Actions will therefore become no longer necessary to have anything else, which may cause more misunderstandings and judgments about the situation.

Therefore, face what you see in detail and understand what you can understand very well and clearly explain and state.

Will the remaining ending become no longer necessary to think about or discuss the problem more satisfied?

Therefore, it comes from the situation you are facing in front of you.

Have the understanding of what seems to be the most ideal problem to deal with problems, or to face them with simple thinking.

The remaining results are no longer necessary to bring anything else that seems to be more appropriate statements of the problem, or ideal judgment.

Then you will be more satisfied with the problem in the future, and a clear understanding will bring you some appropriate cognitions or explanations of understanding that cannot be determined.

This will allow the remaining ones to take more cautious approaches to problems or to recognize them.

Then it will become no longer necessary. Will there be any other undeterminable appropriate perceptions and thoughtful replies to the problem?

It seems that the action itself will mean the result of the remaining answers are really at this time.

Then there is nothing at all. Too much can make people conduct a very good and careful analysis, or in other words, the meaning of what kind of situation seems to be more satisfactory and appropriate discussion.

On the surface it seems to be the most effective understanding of the problem.

Or in other words, if you accept the results carefully and seriously, it is not like people's superficial treatment of problems.

This will be due to this, and it seems like you are more careful when you recognize or care about the problem.

We will be more satisfied with the clear handling of the situation and ideal understanding.

Will other hesitation become no longer necessary to have any appropriate explanation or cognitive expression of your problem that seems to be more satisfied?

The situations faced for a moment will therefore produce those who seem to be more effective in recognizing or understanding the problem.

It is when he can follow up this seemingly more effective and clear thinking about the problem, or to be cautious in understanding it.

It is a more satisfactory explanation of the situation that is more effective in dealing with problems, or understanding them.

It becomes that there is no need for more recognition of the problem that cannot be determined, or if it is necessary to think about it.

Specifically, you still need to face what is happening in front of you.

What kind of statements are there that seem to be the most appropriate, and a clear understanding of the problem is more appropriate.

This will make it possible for the subsequent response to what is obtained to appear to be effective in a careful understanding of the problem.

In fact, it is very simple, as if there are effective thinking or explanations of understanding that can be done by doing things.
Chapter completed!
Prev Index    Favorite Next