"Next, I will respond to some of your understanding and views on my motherland. You said that we are not a democratic country ruled by law. I agree with part of this, but this part is mainly based on our view on democracy. In the Western world, it seems that as long as universal suffrage is not carried out, it is not democratic. Moreover, in the Western world, democracy does not believe that there is diversity and must be a single option. I am dissenting to this."

"In the West, democracy is often linked to freedom. To a large extent, democracy equals freedom. These two concepts are the ones they hang on the edge all day long. But when we change the perspective, what is freedom, freedom means that I can choose you, or choose him, I can choose to accept or reject. Democracy actually means this. In this broader sense, our judgment is actually contrary to the true spirit of freedom. Because we have the right to choose, we can choose universal suffrage, or choose other ways to express our democratic demands. Why do we have to follow their so-called standards? People who often call others hegemony are actually hegemony."

"Everyone can have everyone's beliefs and beliefs. Isn't this wrong? Then why expand a little bit, a nation or a country cannot have its own beliefs and beliefs? It must be possible. Because we all have the same freedom and right, each country can choose the stage of implementing democracy based on its national conditions and cultural characteristics. And I believe that the country behind me will adjust the relevant implementation level with the development of social economy and politics. After all, there are democratic requirements in our constitution. As for whether it will be adjusted to meet Western standards, I personally think we should be cautious. Democracy, prosperity and civilization are our firm goals and options, and there is no doubt."

"Let's talk about the legal system. What is the legal system? It's nothing more than doing things according to the standards of the law. This is divided into two stages, one is legislation and the other is law enforcement. In our country, relevant laws are issued almost every month, involving all aspects of the whole society, such as public security, environmental protection, privacy rights, copyright, personal freedom, industry competition, administrative management, etc. In the pace of legislation, we are getting faster and faster, because we have proposed to rule the country according to law and establish a country ruled by law. This is a unified understanding of the whole country from top to bottom. So at the law enforcement level, we have established a relatively complete law enforcement agency, as well as trial and prosecution agencies. The vast majority of civil rights protection can be within the legal framework.

It is implemented under the frame. Of course, I cannot deny that there may be some mistakes or inadequate aspects in our law enforcement process. This is where we will improve and improve in the future. In Western countries, this seems to have not been completely avoided. For example, American police often shoot black people, such as the horror and dark scenes that often occur in American prisons. We humans are based on a nature that like to demand and measure others with our own standards and understanding. I think it is better to be more tolerant, and we can encourage and communicate more, rather than derogate and impose standards. In short, there is law to follow, and law enforcement must be strict. This is our value orientation, and the code of conduct and direction we adhere to."

"As for me, I will do what I should do. For example, I have made two suggestions. One is the Regulations on the Protection of Citizens' Property and the Regulations on the Protection of Ancient Towns and Ancient Streets, which have become relevant legal provisions and have been well promoted and implemented, and have achieved good results with certain significance. In short, since we are taking a development path that is different from other countries and crossing the river by feeling the stones, our reform will never stop and will unswervingly advance forward to adapt to the development needs of the entire society. However, because there is no precedent and no role model, we must be cautious. Any excessive adjustment or even turn may cause a huge impact on the entire people. In more than half a century of history, we have had more than once experiences and lessons. Thank you, I wonder if you are satisfied with my answer or can accept it?" In fact, in my heart, Chen Kangjie is still not very satisfied with our own legal system construction, but when it comes to the outside world, he cannot become a gunner for self-attack.

Maintaining the dignity of the country is actually equivalent to maintaining one's own face. Even if you want to criticize, Chen Kangjie will speak at home. This is not to say that "family scandals should not be made public", but Chen Kangjie knows that if he makes public, it will become a tool for many people to attack the country. Those media or people who hold double standards will definitely use his words to spread, thereby putting pressure on the country. This is the result that Chen Kangjie would not want to see in any case.

"I don't understand some of them very well, but I believe what you said should be worthy. You have been talking about culture and ethnicity just now, so what do you think about the same issues in our Japan?" said the short-haired girl.

"I am a guest in Japan now, and it seems that it is not suitable to express my opinions on this issue." Chen Kangjie felt that this seemed ordinary, but it contained a trap. Even if this trap was not set up by the other party on purpose, Chen Kangjie was not willing to take it.

If Chen Kangjie praised Japan, wouldn’t he be damaging his country? If he said that Japan is not a democratic country ruled by law, but it seems hypocritical and shallow, and in front of so many Japanese people, he will offend people, embarrass and lose face to many friends who are friendly to him and to China.

Anyway, no matter what he said, there will be people who are dissatisfied, so they simply avoid it.

I didn’t know that the girl with short hair didn’t mind, but Takayasu Okushima, as a jurist, was very interested.

"LONG, I don't think you are not suitable, I really want to hear your opinion."

The principal said this, so Chen Kangjie could not avoid it.

Since he was unable to avoid it, but could not face that problem directly, Chen Kangjie simply used a vague strategy and appropriately changed the topic.

"I only talk about two things to think about this. First, is the Japanese constitution written by the Japanese? No, it was compiled by MacArthur. Second, there are incidents of US troops stationed in Japan harassing Japanese women from time to time. So how many American soldiers are being tried and imprisoned in Japan? I think this is a question worth your consideration. But frankly speaking, in terms of Western democratic standards, you do better than the United States, because theoretically, the president of the United States may be chosen by a few people in the United States, because they are not real universal suffrage, but the electoral vote system. This will not happen to you." Chen Kangjie not only diverted his attention, but also did not forget to take this opportunity to give the United States a knife.

Originally, it was just a communication and discussion after a speech in college, but unexpectedly, his words led to an excuse or reason for many young people in Japan to request constitutional amendment.

Every time Japan proposes to amend the constitution, someone will use Chen Kangjie's words to make a statement, and even some people in China criticize him. Chen Kangjie never argues about those criticisms in public.

Does a person argue for something he deliberately makes for? Usually not. Chen Kangjie is like that. Many of his words to the United States today are not quick or thought-provoking, and he has certain considerations.

In a nutshell, Chen Kangjie did not think that Japan's constitutional amendment was a bad thing. The key was how they repaired it. Because he believed that if China wants to truly revive in the future, to become the leader of the Asian hegemon and even the world, then there might be a war with Japan. Only by truly defeating this close neighbor and defeating the so-called "brother" he called, can we achieve strategic security and great rejuvenation. War requires excuses, and constitutional amendment may be the source of many excuses.

Of course, the dark side of his heart will not be told to the world. On the surface, friendship and communication should still become the focus of his publicity.

Chen Kangjie's words suddenly made the Japanese present look bad, but they could not criticize or refute Chen Kangjie. Because Chen Kangjie only described two well-known facts and did not add any subjective views. He did not say good or bad, just remind them to think.

Therefore, the more people think, the more they think they want to amend the constitution and become a normal country. Many people even make demands to withdraw the US military from their territory.

Next, another boy asked a question about Chen Kangjie's personal situation, and Chen Kangjie patiently answered. The task of giving a speech at Waseda University this time was over.

After the speech, Chen Kangjie did not leave Waseda University immediately, but visited their school history museum and Education. Total Science Academy, and held a donation ceremony at the Education. Total Science Academy.

The reason why Chen Kangjie wanted to donate to the School of Education and Comprehensive Science was that the college established a new Chinese language and Chinese subject. Chen Kangjie donated 10 million US dollars mainly for the construction of this discipline. Three years later, this discipline was incorporated into the established Confucius Institute, making Waseda University the earliest and largest Confucius Institute in Japan.

After leaving Waseda University, Chen Kangjie's Japanese formation was over. However, because of his Japanese itinerary, he brought many crises and obstacles to his future path. His conversation not only offended the Japanese right wing, but also offended the American hawks. Many people wanted to mess with him, or even kill him, but this was a story later.

Since he still has many itineraries in Europe, especially when he has to promote the Olympics, he did not stay in Japan for more time and almost set off directly from Waseda University to Europe.

As for the overwhelming reports of him after he left, the Japanese media reported him in mixed praises and criticisms, so he had no time to take care of it.

...
Chapter completed!