"Superconducting research ushered in a breakthrough: superconducting laws and critical constants!"
"The youngest Fields winner releases world-shaking results in condensed matter physics!"
"Nature magazine publishes the latest research: Calculating the critical temperature of superconducting!"
"In the 21st century, the most important achievement of superconductivity will soon lead to madness in the scientific world!"
"Look forward to technology taking off from today!"
"Wang Hao's new achievement: The Nobel Prize winner in physics has been booked!"
…
…
Wang Hao's paper published in Nature magazine aroused widespread concern in the scientific community. After being recognized by a large number of institutions and scientists, many scientific and technological media reported on it.
Other media outlets also followed suit.
The number of reports grew exponentially, occupying a large amount of news pages in less than a day, triggering comments from all over the world.
Many people saw the news and didn't understand what was going on for a while. After a closer look, they realized that there was progress in the research of superconductivity.
They thought it was nothing at first, because every once in a while, a technological breakthrough would be reported, and most of the content was incomprehensible.
The same is true for research on superconductivity. Related progress has long been beyond the comprehension of ordinary people.
For example, topological superconducting materials.
Topological superconducting materials have been the focus of the field of condensed matter physics in the past decade.
This material is considered to be widely used in quantum computers, but neither topological superconducting materials nor quantum computers seem to have anything to do with ordinary people's lives.
When the news really became popular, many media began to popularize science.
A simple summary of the popular science content is, "This latest achievement in superconductivity can greatly enhance human understanding of superconductivity theory and will lead to technological breakthroughs in the field of superconductivity."
To continue to summarize, "Superconducting technology is taking off, and human science and technology is about to usher in the fourth revolution!"
There are many popular science reports in the media, including what kind of changes have occurred in human science and technology after the take-off of superconducting technology.
For example, electricity-related technologies will undergo great improvements.
For example, magnetic levitation will become the preferred means of transportation in the future.
For example, energy supply is no longer an issue.
etc.
A sentence in the "Xinhua Youth Daily" report illustrates the changes that the development of superconducting technology will bring, "The take-off of superconducting technology will change the existing scientific and technological landscape!"
Superconducting technology is really important.
In terms of energy supply, most electricity is still used nearby, because electricity transportation causes very large energy losses, and the farther the distance, the greater the losses.
If normal-temperature superconducting materials can be developed, there will be no problem in transporting domestically produced electricity directly to continent O.
This directly changes the energy logic.
In addition, many technologies related to electricity will advance rapidly.
For example, the most common electronic products.
Many technologies in electronic products do not need to be used, only product performance is enough, because the superconducting state does not consume energy, and will not bring about a series of effects such as heat generation and low efficiency.
When the conductor is in a superconducting state, even magnetic force cannot penetrate it, which means that some technologies will no longer have advantages, while other technologies that seem to have no "practical value" may suddenly emerge.
…
This is a cross-level technology that brings about changes in technological logic.
Amid constant reports in the media, there has been a lot of discussion in public opinion, "This latest research is simply a bug. It uses a formula to calculate the critical temperature of superconducting materials, and there is no need to do experiments at all."
"This is still research done by the great master Wang Hao. The great master is indeed a great master. If he switches to the field of physics, he can also achieve Nobel-level results."
"No, beyond Nobel level!"
"In the past few decades, many physicists have won Nobel Prizes based on research on the theoretical mechanism of superconductivity, but their research will definitely not be able to keep up with this one!"
"This research cannot be overemphasized. It is directly equivalent to creating a new research field!"
"What you said is so professional. I have read a lot of popular science reports. What I am looking forward to most now is to drive a maglev car..."
"Upstairs, don't look forward to it. When it comes out, you won't be able to afford it!"
…
While a large number of media are reporting on it, many professional institutions around the world are also conducting research on Wang Hao's latest achievements.
Every institution is very interested.
Just like the discussion in public opinion, Wang Hao's research has created a new direction in the research of superconducting mechanisms, and it can even be said that it will become the main direction.
His research directly links theory and application.
Previous research on the theoretical mechanism of superconductivity does not seem to have anything to do with applications, and seems to be the content of two fields.
His results were disruptive.
Many institutions also hope to find new directions from Wang Hao's research, and what they have to do is to understand the core of Wang Hao's research.
In Wang Hao's published results paper, he explained that his research is centered on microscopic morphology, which can be understood mathematically as "new geometry".
In reports from some technology media, the new geometry has been named ‘Wang’s geometry’.
Therefore, it can be easily concluded that the shaping of Wang's geometry is the core of research, and Wang Hao's work report at the Mathematicians Conference also supports this.
But what is the shaping process?
Some people believe that Wang Hao used the study of electromagnetic field forces as a breakthrough. The evidence is that at a conference of mathematicians, Wang Hao directly talked about using Wang's geometry to explain electromagnetic forces.
So how does Wang's geometry explain electromagnetic force?
Some media reporters interviewed professional physicists, but they were unable to give a definite answer.
Charles Kane of the University of Pennsylvania has become the focus, firstly because he is a reviewer of the paper, and most importantly, his research results on "special morphology of particles" are almost consistent with the microscopic morphology mentioned in Wang Hao's research.
of.
Charles Kane has received a lot of attention, and he has also been openly interviewed by the media.
“In Wang Hao’s research, microscopic morphology refers to the special shape of particles.”
"However, his research went much deeper. He created new geometries, explained the special shapes of particles, and achieved practical results."
In fact, Charles Kane hoped to emphasize his results, but in the end his research only said that there may be a special form of particles, without giving a more detailed explanation for it, and even the expression was somewhat uncertain.
…
In any case, his research results are closest to Wang Hao's research.
Charles Kane continued to explain his opinion, "I think he has completed a brand new theory, or a theory in a new direction as a premise."
"For example, I know his annihilation theory."
"In terms of research on this theory, he only disclosed some ideas, but I think they are related."
"Perhaps he will continue to conduct in-depth research? In short, there will definitely be a new theory, and only if the theory is the premise is there a direction."
"The most important thing for us now is to connect the existing superconducting theory and research on condensed matter physics with Wang Hao's recent results, so that we can continue to improve the theory of superconducting mechanisms."
"Combining relevant theories together and then conducting targeted experimental verification."
"This is the main direction of the future."
Charles Kane's statement also represents the thoughts of many physicists.
Wang Hao's latest research results have little to do with traditional research on superconducting mechanisms, but they are directly related to applications. However, some theoretical advances in the past have also been verified experimentally.
If the two can be combined, it will definitely be of great significance to the improvement of the theoretical mechanism of superconductivity.
Because he did not understand some information, Charles Kane's ideas were still subject to certain limitations.
American, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Philip Rohrer is a very important expert in condensed matter physics. He has been working for the National Laboratory and conducting some confidential research.
Fifteen years ago, he participated in the research on exchanged gravity. The research continued for seven years. Because there was no further progress in related research, the experimental data was sealed.
To be continued...