Sokai University, Mason Mathematical Sciences Laboratory, Office of the Director.
Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones continued to think about the mathematical content on the whiteboard. They were summarizing the research and would later substitute numerical values ​​for calculations.
Paul Phil-Jones took two steps back, looked at the content on the whiteboard as a whole, and then emphasized seriously, "It is perfect, but it must be wrong."
He paused and asked Wang Hao, "Aren't you worried?"
"What are you worried about?" Wang Hao looked at the content on the whiteboard seriously and asked with a calm expression.
Paul Field-Jones said, "The analysis and calculation process are very rigorous and there are no problems, but we will be able to get the exact results right away. If the conclusion is wrong, you should know what it means, right?"
Wang Hao turned his head and said, "That means the foundation is wrong, indicating that the annihilation force is not higher in dimension than the three microscopic forces."
"Aren't you worried?" Paul Phil-Jones asked curiously again.
Wang Hao shook his head and said simply, "Of course not."
"Why?"
"Because I have confidence!"
Paul Phil-Jones opened his mouth, but didn't say anything for a long time. He found that one thing he couldn't compare to Wang Hao was his confidence in theory.
If the research on string theory can reach the step of related experiments, he will definitely be very looking forward to verifying it, but at the same time he will be very nervous, worried that the verification will lead to wrong conclusions.
Wang Hao, on the other hand, was calm and didn't seem to be worried at all.
This shows that Wang Hao is very confident in research.
Paul Field-Jones did not understand this kind of confidence. He could only think that Wang Hao's confidence in annihilation theory exceeded his confidence in string theory.
In fact, he didn't care about this, but he felt very conflicted in his heart because he found that he had some doubts about string theory.
It cannot be said that we completely doubt string theory, but we doubt some of the research in it.
He and Wang Hao completed this research together, and the beauty of the mathematical process seems to go further than the research on string theory.
Mathematics pursues beauty.
In addition, their research can further analyze microphysics. If they continue their research, they are likely to complete a unified theory.
String theory also pursues the unification of theory, but many of its analysis involve complex understanding, for example, the analysis of dimensions in M ​​theory.
The analysis of these parts is difficult to be recognized by ordinary people, or even recognized by peers.
If it involves four dimensions, it will be better, but if it involves higher dimensions, the mathematics will become very complicated. The more you study, the more problems you will encounter.
The theoretical explanation given by Wang Hao now describes space compression as the source of all forces. When combined with the existing quantum physics system, it is obviously more acceptable because the theory does not involve obscure high dimensions and cannot be understood.
It does not conflict with the existing physical system.
In addition, if you continue to think deeply and use the source and influence of the annihilation force to understand black holes, antimatter, dark matter, etc., you can truly expand your research, instead of "forcibly" explaining it like string theory.
Of course, there is still a lot of research to be done and many problems to be solved in the process.
The process of improving a new theory is very, very complicated.
Paul Phil-Jones continued to think, and he couldn't help but have doubts about string theory. "Is string theory wrong? Or is part of it wrong?"
Of course he wouldn't say it out loud, he just kept thinking in silence.
Wang Hao returned to his seat and began to perform the final calculations.
When Paul Phil-Jones came to his senses, he also joined in to calculate together. It goes without saying that the speed of two top international mathematicians working together is unparalleled.
In just one day, they calculated the results.
"183GeV-187GeV."
Wang Hao
He said with certainty, "There is an undiscovered particle within this energy range."
"My results are the same..."
Paul Phil-Jones said with complicated eyes, he didn't know how to face his conflicting feelings.
On the one hand, he hopes that the research is wrong, which means that part of the mathematical content of string theory will not be denied; on the other hand, of course he hopes that the research he is involved in is correct, and he also likes this research work.
The former affirms the past and denies the present.
The latter denies the past and affirms the present.
How to choose this?
Science is certainly not a multiple-choice question.
Wang Hao smiled and said, "Now I am more sure of the correctness of the conclusion."
Paul Field-Jones raised his head.
Wang Hao sent him the information, "Let's take a look at the report of the last particle collision test experiment.
CERN’s particle collision experiments will release very detailed research reports every time. What you can see in the news are only some big discoveries, while some small discoveries or points that need attention will be published in the detailed report of the experiment.
inside.
The detailed report is also open to the public and can be viewed by any partner institution after logging in.
However, the detailed experimental report is very complicated and obviously only professionals will read it, and ordinary people will definitely not care.
Paul Phil-Jones looked at the data content and quickly found a very important one - there are numerical signal fluctuations in the range of 178-195 GeV.
This is a very small experimental conclusion.
In the detailed report of the experiment, there are more than a dozen similar abnormal numerical signal fluctuations, which are most likely caused by errors. It is even said that the impact of the pipe being knocked during the experiment may be higher than the detected signal fluctuations.
.
Therefore, similar conclusions will not attract attention at all when placed in detailed experimental reports, but the results calculated by them are different.
The two just correspond to each other.
Paul Field-Jones took a deep breath, "So our research is correct?"
"I've always been sure."
Wang Hao smiled and said, "It's just that it's hard to say whether it can be verified. The value fluctuates abnormally. It only makes sense if it is expanded to a trust value."
"But at least our research can be published."
Next, they began to summarize the research together, but because there was no positive research on the annihilation theory and only some definitional basis, the published content was related to the decay description and calculation.
It took them three days to complete the decay description and summary of the calculations.
Wang Hao thought for a while and submitted his paper to "The Universe and the Microscopic World".
"Universe and Microscopic World" is a professional quantum physics journal. It ranks among the top five most influential journals in physics. More importantly, they have cooperation with the European Organization for Nuclear Organization.
Many results related to particle collision experiments will be published in "Universe and Microscopic World".
The research they conducted was a new analysis of the decay problem, as well as calculations based on the Yang-Mills equation. They also came to the conclusion that there is a brand-new particle in a specific energy range. They submitted it to "The Universe and the Microworld".
Suitable.
······
The journal "Universe and Microcosm" is headquartered in Hamburg, Germany.
Dudek-Müller is a professional review editor of the journal. He has worked for more than 20 years.
When he comes to the office every morning, the first thing Dudek-Mueller does is to scan the submissions he has received, find those that are of interest, and put them into a special folder.
These will be the morning's tasks.
Submissions that you are not interested in will be placed in another folder and will be read at a later time.
Dudek-Mueller checked the contents of his mailbox and immediately noticed a submission titled "Analysis of Decay and Undiscovered Particles."
"Analytical decay?"
"New undiscovered particles?"
Dudek-Mueller looked a little funny. He subconsciously threw the manuscript into the trash can without even bothering to look at it.
The title of this submission is too big.
The analysis of decay is somewhat understandable, but what does it mean to talk about new particles discovered?
To be continued...