This is news that shocked the international physics community.

Although there had been estimates before, it was still surprising that it was actually confirmed. Many people have revisited the research conducted by Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones.

They can calculate new particles in advance by shaping a new mathematical system for decay problems and combining them with the Yang-Mills equation for calculations.

This approach is very incredible.

In the past, most new particles were discovered through the analysis of experimental data of particle collisions. The number of particles that can be predicted through research theory is very rare, and they are also very critical particles.

Such as the Higgs particle and neutrinos.

The Higgs particle and neutrinos all belong to a large category of particles, and it is not surprising that they can be predicted through calculations. However, individual mesons are a small category of particles, and their role in the theory is extremely weak.

Now it can be predicted through calculation, which makes many physicists find it incredible.

Many physicists have begun to study the research results of Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones, and they have also become interested in the annihilation theory.

at the same time.

A large number of media at home and abroad have reported on the new particles discovered by the European Particle Collider experiment, as well as Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones' advance predictions of the new particles.

[To be honest, I have been using Yeguoyuedu recently to read and catch up on new books. I can switch sources and read aloud with many sounds. www.yeguoyuedu.com is available for Android and Apple.]

Many reporters also went to Xihai University to interview Wang Hao.

It was very difficult for them to interview Wang Hao, but regarding the discovery of new particles, Wang Hao still made a public appearance. He explained the research, "Our research mainly revolves around the annihilation theory."

"I have always believed that there is an annihilation force, which can be understood as space squeezing, and our latest theory believes that the annihilation force has a higher dimension."

"Mathematically speaking..."

Wang Hao started a long speech related to mathematics, which also made some reporters who interviewed him recall the pain of the past.

They can only turn on the recorder to record, and there is no need to think about following and understanding.

After Wang Hao gave a brief explanation, he did not accept any more interviews.

Then Paul Phil-Jones became the focus.

Paul Phil-Jones is a full professor at the California Institute of Technology, but most scholars do not pay attention to him. He does not have the experience of being sought after by a large group of reporters.

Paul Phil-Jones couldn't help but feel an extreme sense of accomplishment. He said excitedly, "The basis of our research is that the annihilation force has a higher dimension. Or simply understood, the annihilation force creates the other three forces.

.”

"It's a cause and effect relationship."

"The force of annihilation creates decay and is the source of other forces. Because of this..."

"The theory of annihilation is a theory that can achieve great unification. I think..."

The more Paul Phil-Jones talked, the more immersed he became, and later even expressed this, “Although string theory is also a unified theory, I think annihilation theory is correct, and many problems in string theory are just empty.

imagination."

"The work I am doing now is to build a new unified theoretical system based on annihilation theory."

"The direct result, as you can see, is that we can predict new particles, and we can also predict other microphysical phenomena in the future..."

"I believe that research on annihilation theory can provide theoretical support for particle collision experiments..."

…

Since the new particle was identified by CERN, more physicists are paying attention to the annihilation theory.

String theory scholars are not in a good mood because some mathematical systems in the research of Wang Hao and Paul Phil Jones conflict with string theory.

Now that their research is proven correct, doesn't it mean that the mathematical system representing string theory is wrong?

Even if it cannot be proved that everything is wrong, some errors are difficult to accept.

Princeton University.

Edward Witten was sitting in his office, watching Paul Phil Jones talk freely on the news, and even said, "Many problems in string theory are just empty imaginations."

How can such words be harsh?

If he hadn't actually seen the interviews and reports, he wouldn't have believed that Paul Phil-Jones would 'rebel'.

How can it be!

That was Paul Phil-Jones, who was extremely loyal to string theory. He not only studied annihilation theory, but also spoke ill of string theory in front of the media.

This rebellion is so thorough!

Edward Witten felt that he had nothing to say, because the other party's research did predict new particles, which meant that the main direction of the research was correct.

So, string theory is wrong?

He could not accept the conclusion that string theory was wrong, but he could not figure out how to refute it.

When Edward Witten was distressed, he discovered that he had received an email from the magazine "Science", which was sent by an editor-in-chief, inviting him to review professional papers.

He was really not in the mood to review the manuscript, but he still scanned the title of the paper, ""Analysis of the Big Bang Based on Annihilation Theory and String Theory"?"

"Annihilation theory combined with string theory?"

"What logic?"

Edward Witten was a little confused, but he became interested and immediately responded to an email, confirming that he would help with the review work.
Chapter completed!