"You mean the very beginning? The definition of mass unit is used..."
"It uses the term mass point, in which there are two determinants, which are mass units, and different combinations of mass units are used to define particles."
"So, it directly denies string theory on a fundamental basis!"
After hearing Wang Hao's explanation, Paul Phil Jones immediately understood.
They thought wrong before.
The research was carried out by combining annihilation theory and string theory, and subsequent expansion incorporated the annihilation system into the 11-dimensional space content of string theory. They subconsciously felt that the research was wrong.
This is because the underlying basic definitions of annihilation theory and string theory conflict.
They didn't even think about whether the research might be correct, and they just kept looking for problems in the paper.
The research is correct. If there is no problem, no problem can be found.
Parsons' research, to put it bluntly, is a mathematical explanation of the Big Bang based on annihilation theory. It only uses some mathematical content of string theory in the process, and part of it is the cross-dimensional research of Paul Phil-Jones.
The crux of the problem is that the research has not truly combined the two theories, and the lowest foundation still only contains the content of the annihilation theory.
There are many basic definitions at the beginning of the research, all of which are directly related to the annihilation theory. The definition of mass point only has two lines of content, which is not conspicuous in it, but it is the basis for subsequent research.
The definition of different particles in the research is 'different ways of combining mass units to construct different particles.
The definition of string theory is that 'strings vibrate in different ways and shapes to form different particles.
The two definitions are completely different.
Since the definition method of annihilation theory is adopted, nature has nothing to do with string theory, and even directly denies the content of string theory to a certain extent. Because string theory is out of the framework of "different particle definitions," subsequent research can be said to be wrong.
Isn't this just drawing money from under the cauldron?
It directly denies string theory from the underlying basis. As for the extended ‘annihilation system’ that is attributed to string theory, it is simply meaningless.
Wang Hao continued thinking, "This research does not directly deny string theory. Perhaps Mr. Parsons did not notice this, and the denial will not have any subsequent expansion."
"But the key problem is that now physicists around the world, including string theory scholars, have seen the research content. In addition, the person who reviewed the paper was Edward Witten."
"Do you understand?"
Paul Phil-Jones followed and thought about it, and his mouth opened in surprise. His way of thinking would not consider these side issues, but having no emotional intelligence does not mean that he is a fool.
After hearing what Wang Hao said, he immediately understood. The reviewer of this paper was Edward Witten. Witten also gave great recognition to the research in his comments, saying that it was a "major achievement in theoretical physics."
Edward Witten is the first person in string theory today. The content he approves will definitely be recognized by string theory scholars, and recognition means that they affirm the content.
However, the research content denies string theory on a fundamental basis.
Ledley Parsons...
This has dug a big hole for scholars in the string theory camp!
Edward Witten also fell into the trap!
Paul Phil-Jones kept thinking about it for a long time without closing his mouth. He didn't know how to face this matter.
Edward Witten was once his idol.
String theory is his main research direction.
Should he laugh or cry?
Paul Phil-Jones was silent for a long time, and could only say angrily, "Ledley is indeed a villain, a bastard, a despicable scum..."
.......
The results of Ledley-Parsons' research are indeed very significant.
Currently, there is only one model for the mathematical analysis of the Big Bang in the physics community, and Ledley-Parson
Si provides a new mode based on the force of annihilation.
Other scholars are focused on understanding it, and new research has provided them with a new way of thinking. Based on the definition of annihilation theory, physical analysis can also be done, and the research direction has naturally become very broad.
Among them, string theory scholars are even more happy. Annihilation theory is the "biggest enemy." As a result, an analysis related to the Big Bang incorporated the annihilation system into the string theory system.
This is a major academic victory!
Many string theory scholars have followed Ledley-Parsons. "Ledley's results are really amazing. He actually completed a new analysis of the big bang."
"More importantly, he included the annihilation system into string theory, which further proves that string theory is a theory that can achieve grand unification."
"This is a major achievement of string theory!"
"..."
They feel it is a major victory for string theory research.
At the same time, the new mathematical analysis of the big bang is more refined and more credible than the original one. Some definitions introduce the content of annihilation theory, and the extension can also involve particle collision experiments. After reading the new research, they even thought of,
There will be a day when string theory can be proven.
Many string theory scholars are as happy as if they are celebrating a holiday.
Some people start to study the content of annihilation theory after thinking about it. Annihilation theory is merged into string theory. Studying annihilation theory seems to be studying string theory.
Of course they also know that the new method of studying the 'annexation and annihilation theory' is a bit far-fetched.
But, it doesn't matter.
In fact, many string theory scholars have the same idea as Ledley-Parsons. They don't pay much attention to string theory, but there are only a few scholars like Parsons who are thick-skinned and don't care about face.
There was a conflict between annihilation theory and string theory before, so it was naturally difficult to directly switch to the study of annihilation theory.
Now that the two theories are directly grouped together, there is an excuse to start research on the annihilation theory.
Ridley Parsons has become a sought-after figure in the string theory circle, and his reputation has taken a 180-degree turn. Some people have already put the title of "second in command of string theory" directly on his head.
As for the fact that Parsons was "misunderstood and became a traitor" in the past period of time, it was simply forgotten.
Or there is a new explanation, "Ledley is not a traitor!"
"The purpose of his research on annihilation theory is to incorporate annihilation theory into the string theory system!"
"Ledley is a hero!"
"He is the kind of real hero who is willing to bear the name of 'traitor', silently do research and defeat his opponent in one fell swoop!"
This explanation makes many people feel excited.
Amerikan's public opinion environment itself worships heroes. After the news spread out in the physics circle, some filmmakers even thought about shooting a "spy war" movie based on Ridley Parsons in the academic field.
Ledley Parsons was naturally very happy. He suddenly became a hero of string theory and a focal figure in the international physics community.
Thinking about it, he felt that he was a genius for being able to incorporate the annihilation system into the string theory system.
While walking on the road, Ledley Parsons couldn't help but raise his head. After going to the bar, he told some girls about his heroic deeds.
Unfortunately, the girls didn't understand it at all.
But, it doesn't matter.
Because he appeared in many media reports, he came up with some news related to himself, and naturally it was easy for the girls to pay attention to him.
that's enough.
For several days in a row, Parsons enjoyed the free service, and he felt like he was living in paradise.
not only that.
He was recognized by the string theory circle and received an invitation from Edward Witten to attend a gathering of string theory scholars at Princeton University.
By then, the protagonist will definitely be him!
........
After finding the problem, Wang Hao simply sorted out the content. Since it was not some research, he simply posted a Weibo message--
"The new issue of the magazine "Science-Physics" contains a paper analyzing the Big Bang theory.
That is very, very good research on annihilation theory!
I am very happy to see that there are excellent theoretical physics results related to annihilation theory!
The research on annihilation theory requires more scholars to participate in order to gradually improve it. It is a good research direction to explain cosmic phenomena based on annihilation theory.
Congratulations to Mr. Ledley-Parsons, he is a very good theoretical physicist!"
To be continued...