After the release of the new issue of "Universe and Microphysics", many physicists have paid attention to the expression of wave-particle duality.
The physics community has a somewhat unclear statement on the problem of wave-particle duality. The conventional statement provides a theoretical framework that enables any substance to sometimes exhibit particle properties and sometimes to exhibit wave properties.
Quantum mechanics believes that all particles in nature, including massless photons and neutrinos, including massed electrons and atoms, can be described by a differential equation.
For example, Schrödinger equation.
The solution to this equation is the wave function, which describes the state of the particle.
Wave functions are superimposable and can interfere with each other like waves. At the same time, wave functions are also interpreted as describing the probability of a particle appearing at a specific location.
In this way, particle nature and wave nature are unified in the same explanation.
Among them, the issue of de Broglie wavelength is involved, which explains that the wave nature of objects cannot be observed in life. This is because the de Broglie wavelength is much smaller than the observable limit size, so the size of the wave nature may occur, and in daily life
Outside the scope of life experience.
Conventional explanations in the physics world feel like "imposition and analysis" of the problem of wave-particle duality, which makes people feel difficult to understand. When encountering physical problems, they are basically useless.
The results released by Wang Hao's research group now provide a new explanation of wave-particle duality based on the topological structure of photons.
A simple description is, "Each photon can exist alone and can also be related to each other."
The key lies in the two-point-five-dimensional topological structure.
At the same time, because the two-point-five-dimensional topological structure cannot continue to stay in the three-dimensional universe, it requires constant movement to ensure its continued existence.
This also explains the high-speed motion of massless particles and extends to the tremor problem of microscopic particles.
In fact, the new explanation is not very clear. It only uses a mathematical framework to demonstrate the characteristics of the 2.5-dimensional topological structure from the side.
But as a brand-new theory, a brand-new explanation of wave-particle duality is completely sufficient.
It can be generalized from this that most particles have a 2.5-dimensional structure, which also explains why photons can be continuously generated.
Photons exist in many physical phenomena. Even in the propagation process of light, the reflection phenomenon is the process from the annihilation of photons to the generation of photons.
If we continue to think broadly, we can generalize to the fact that all particles are related to each other. Even electrons and photons, two completely unrelated particles, both have a two-point-five-dimensional topological structure.
In this way, many unexplainable physical phenomena can also be explained.
For example, the most classic and mysterious double-slit interference experiment.
If you think about it deeply, the double-slit interference experiment is very scary. Many scientists have done double-slit interference experiments.
To explain simply, when there is a camera observing photons, the light will not behave like a wave.
On the contrary, without observation, light will behave like a wave.
It's like the photon "knows that someone is observing it, so it shows different behaviors to hide itself."
The new explanation of wave-particle duality believes that all particles have a two-point five-dimensional topological structure, which can also be understood as being related.
Then any way of observing particles will itself affect the experiment.
…
Many scholars are discussing new research, but the focus is still on the wave-particle duality.
This is mainly because the research content is very profound and it is not easy to understand quickly. The most prominent issue of wave-particle duality was the first thing that was noticed.
When studying the paper in depth, some famous scholars quickly discovered that wave-particle duality was not the only result.
In fact, the real results of the research still revolve around the structure of photons, mainly using the structure of photons to explain the problem of the reduction of the speed of light in the AC gravity field.
Edward Witten is one of the scholars who understands the content of the paper the fastest.
As the top theoretical physicist, Edward Witten's personal ability goes without saying. But when he saw the name "Paul Phil Jones" among the authors of the paper, he felt very depressed.
After the emergence of annihilation theory, two "famous traitors" appeared in string theory.
One is Ledley Parsons of Florida State University.
Based on the annihilation theory, Parsons conducted a brand-new analysis of the Big Bang and also refuted some mathematical contents of string theory.
At the same time, he also "tricked" him severely.
Edward Witten gritted his teeth thinking about it. He usually had a good temper and was always irritable with everyone, but he still felt that Parsons was too much.
The other one is Paul Phil-Jones.
Edward Witten felt very sorry for Paul Phil Jones, a great general of string theory. He had always felt that Paul Phil Jones was his successor.
As a result, Paul Phil-Jones turned to research on annihilation theory, and he continued to achieve important results.
The same goes for the paper in front of me.
Edward Witten looked at the paper and let out a long sigh. He had already read the part describing the wave-particle duality. Just looking at the mathematical content, he knew clearly that this part was probably Paul Phil Jones.
Completed.
"Paul, it's hard to come back..." Edward Witten continued reading with depression.
Although he is over seventy years old, his brain speed is no longer what it used to be, and it can be said that he has no creativity at all, it is still very easy for him to understand the content.
"The expression of the two-point five-dimensional topological structure is indeed very novel, and it can explain many problems."
"What an amazing theory..."
Edward Witten lamented, "But the core is still the expression of the communication gravity field."
"Communicating the gravity field is to reduce the effect of the annihilation force, which is to reduce the space squeezing effect..."
"After a series of structures and derivation, there are still conclusions related to the experiment..."
This is indeed Wang Hao's style.
They are also doing research in theoretical physics, but many of Wang Hao's studies have clear conclusions, not just the mathematical content of the structural theory.
Many conclusions can be directly linked to experiments. Because of this, the annihilation theory was quickly accepted by the international physics community.
This is incomparable to string theory.
Edward Witten quickly understood the conclusion, "So, the conclusion is that the speed of light is negatively correlated with the AC gravity field strength."
"The higher the field strength, the lower the speed of light. When the field strength reaches 50%, the speed of light will drop by about 15%."
"When the field strength reaches 100%, photons will lose their wave characteristics?"
Edward Witten frowned at the conclusion.
Let’s not talk about the final conclusion for the time being, because 100% exchange of gravity fields is definitely unachievable for the time being.
However, 50%... seems to be OK!
Edward Witten is a leading figure in string theory, but he also admires the research on annihilation theory. What is in front of him is a very exquisite theoretical research, and he is also curious about whether the subject of the research is correct.
He immediately found the Los Alamos Laboratory and contacted Philip Rohrer, the head of the antigravity experiment team. He asked bluntly, "Regarding the latest research, when the AC gravity field is 50% stronger,
Are you ready to verify the conclusion that the speed of light will be reduced by 15%?"
Philip Rohrer on the opposite side was stunned.
When he learned that Edward Witten called him, he was a little surprised, because compared to Edward Witten, he was just an ordinary experimental researcher, and he was definitely at the bottom of the academic contempt chain.
But after hearing the content on the phone, Philip Laurel was not in a good mood. He thought about it and said, "Maybe we can give it a try?"
Then
He explained, "I have to ask other people because verification requires some funds..."
"Besides, it's not something I can decide alone."
Funding is only one of them, technical issues are the key factor.
Their research team publicly announced that it can use high-temperature superconducting materials to create an anti-gravity field of more than 50%.
In fact, they can only use low-temperature superconducting materials to create a 50% anti-gravity field.
This is the highest technology available.
If it is to create the highest intensity anti-gravity field to detect the speed of light, it is not something that their experimental team can do alone, and the cooperation of other related teams is required.
In addition, if you want to conduct detailed testing and obtain accurate data, you will definitely need to do more than one experiment, which will definitely consume a lot of money.
Philip Rohrer put down the phone and thought he should put it off for a while.
However, there were many scholars who had similar ideas to Edward Witten, and Philip Laurel soon received phone calls one after another.
To be continued...