Wang Hao and Paul Phil-Jones disputed two issues.
One is whether time can exist independently of motion.
The other is whether the same time reference system can be applied to different annihilation force field environments. To put it bluntly, whether the time flow rate in different annihilation force field environments is consistent.
From the perspective of physics, time is just a definition and a perception.
Just like the concept of a day means that the earth rotates once, the concept of a year means that the earth revolves around the sun once. Every minute and every second is naturally a refined time.
The only thing that exists for sure in the universe is motion.
The movement of celestial bodies, stars, planets, satellites, movement and the development of the universe bring changes in time.
Therefore, time is just a definition, but movement is real.
In fact, this type of problem can only depend on personal understanding. Even if time does not exist, it is difficult to give effective proof.
Obviously, Paul Phil-Jones and Helen are on the same side.
This is mainly because they are all pure mathematicians and physicists, and they like to speak in pure mathematics and physics.
Wang Hao believes that time and motion coexist, and the flow rate of time can be linked to the strength of the annihilation force field.
This is the result of system feedback.
He was naturally very confident in this, and some of his expressions were very positive, but he was unable to convince Paul, Phil Jones, Helen and others for the time being.
If the debate is conducted only from a theoretical perspective, once the content is in-depth, it will soon leave the category of conventional mathematical physics and shift to the category of philosophy.
For example, time paradox.
Time paradox is a science fiction term, which means that after humans can control the three-dimensional space at will, they can travel to the past or the future.
From the perspective of serious physical theories, for example, Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" points out that it is possible to change time without violating the known physical laws.
There are many hypotheses about the "time paradox".
For example, the "parallel universe" hypothesis holds that there are many similar "clone worlds" in the universe. When someone goes back to the past, he enters another parallel world, and may also create many other parallel worlds in the main world.
The world, and the sub-world collapsed and disappeared at a certain moment, or it may remain the same as before, but the laws and situations of each world may not be the same.
etc.
The discussion in the office introduced the issue of time paradox.
This is mainly because their discussion has an additional concept of annihilation force field compared to conventional physics. Wang Hao's "time perspective" also revolves around the annihilation force field.
Current annihilation force field technology has proven that different annihilation force field environments can exist in the same space (antigravity field and strong annihilation force field). If the time flow rate is related to the annihilation force field, a problem may arise: using ultra-high intensity
The annihilation force field travels through the past or future.
Of course, it's just theoretical.
For example, if certain particles move from an antigravity field or a strong annihilation force field to a conventional force field environment, they can theoretically travel through the future or past.
This view is difficult to accept by Paul, Helen and others.
They made various citations with good reason and wrote a lot of mathematical content on the whiteboard to refute Wang Hao's arguments.
Wang Hao is ‘looking for problems’.
Because he was sure that his statement was correct, and there must be some problems with Paul and Helen's refutations, he kept looking for problems to refute.
In the current debate, Wang Hao can only passively defend.
This is mainly because the opponent's camp includes Paul Phil Jones, Helen's two generals, Huang Xing, Zhang He and Luo Dayong are also on the opposite camp.
Behind him were only Qi Xiao and Chen Mengmeng.
Qi Xiao is a professor of information science, and his computer skills are quite good. When it comes to advanced physics and mathematics, most of the time he can only be a spectator and shout slogans.
Chen Mengmeng didn't have much support.
"Alas~~"
When his point of view was refuted again, he felt a little dry and looked at the two people who supported him. He let out a long sigh.
He missed Ding Zhiqiang a little bit.
"If Xiao Ding is here and can say something and give some inspiration, maybe he can find the key and refute the opponent in one fell swoop!"
Wang Hao thought depressedly.
The debate in the office eventually broke up. Both parties felt a little tired from shouting and their brains needed a rest, so they reached a tacit truce.
Paul Phil-Jones and Helen were still a little unfinished. They walked out of the room and were still saying, "Wang Hao must be wrong!"
"Teacher Wang is right most of the time, but not necessarily this time!"
"He just had nothing to say."
"Of course we are right about this question. How can time exist without motion? It would be interesting to prove that Teacher Wang is wrong..."
Helen's eyes gleamed as she spoke.
Paul Phil-Jones also feels the same way. Whenever he thinks of 'proving Wang Hao wrong', he feels very motivated.
This is even more exciting than completing a big result.
"Proving Wang Hao is wrong is an achievement in itself..." Several people thought so, but they just didn't say it out loud.
Wang Hao was right all along.
In the field of scientific exploration and knowledge, he seems to be an omnipotent superman. It is naturally very interesting to prove that superman can also make mistakes.
Of course this is not to stand against Wang Hao.
This is just a discussion about time. Everyone can have their own opinions, and there is no way to prove right or wrong.
But being able to win a debate is also a kind of success.
the other side.
Wang Hao was lamenting that his teammates were so incompetent.
Paul Phil-Jones and Helen are both top geniuses with exceeding IQs and rich knowledge of mathematics and physics. Facing them is already very tiring. Behind them are Luo Dayong, Huang Xing and Zhang.
crane.
Chen Mengmeng and Qi Xiao can at most compete with one Luo Dayong. He is equal to one person facing four people, and the other two are super geniuses...
What a bully!
After a debate at the bottom, Wang Hao felt very unwilling and hoped to prove that he was right.
But how to prove it?
experiment?
Liao Jianguo's experimental data analysis did show an abnormality of "advanced" detection, but it is difficult to explain the problem with just some experimental data.
Because experiments may make mistakes.
Even the current results are within the allowable error range, and it is not 100% certain that there is an advance problem in the detection.
But it is impossible to have other data in a short period of time.
The more Wang Hao thought about it, the more depressed he became. He was clearly on the side of the truth, but people around him thought he was on the side that went against science.
They sat in their offices and thought carefully, hoping to prove the existence of time in a purely mathematical way.
result……
Nothing was found!
Wang Hao finally left the office, went home and had a good sleep, and went to the nuclear fusion device design team feeling refreshed the next day.
He found Ding Zhiqiang directly.
After Ding Zhiqiang joined the main design team, he was assigned a lot of practical work, which made his work very busy and he stayed with the design team most of the time.
"Teacher Wang, are you looking for me?" Ding Zhiqiang opened the door and walked in.
"Sit, over here."
Wang Hao was very enthusiastic about Ding Zhiqiang. He even made a cup of coffee for the students with his own hands, and then talked about the time issue discussed yesterday.
"What do you think about this issue?" he asked expectantly.
To be continued...