About an hour before the press conference started, the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Academy of Sciences announced that they had created a proton beam that exceeded the speed of light.
This message is an announcement only.
The content of the announcement was to announce the experimental news. They cooperated with the Antigravity Form Research Center and used particle accelerators and strong annihilation field technology to create a particle beam with a speed of '302296776 meters/second'. The end of the announcement was to explain the specifics.
Experimental information will be published in the next issue of "Annihilation Physics and Theory".
The announcement caused international shock when it was released.
The keywords include 'cooperation with the Center for Antigravity Properties', 'Wang Hao's participation', 'strong annihilation field technology', 'particle accelerator', and of course the most important '302296776 meters/second', '1.0095 times
"speed of light", etc.
The Institute of High Energy has not received much official attention, but anyone who sees the news will be shocked.
It has always been considered that particle acceleration cannot reach the speed of light. There are popular science articles everywhere, explaining that "it requires infinite ability to accelerate particles to the speed of light." The mechanism of particle accelerators is used to continuously improve the technology, and the pursuit is only to bring "particles closer"
speed of light'.
As for reaching the speed of light, it is simply impossible.
Beyond...
I don't even dare to think about it.
Within half an hour after the news was released, "various shocks" spread throughout the physics community. Some people were even woken up from their sleep when they heard a colleague say, "Particles are accelerated beyond the speed of light."
", they immediately became energetic and went to read the announcement.
In a very short period of time, the news spread to the media and public opinion level.
"Washington State Journal" is the media that knows the information the fastest. Of course, they will not pay attention to the Institute of High Energy of the Academy of Sciences, but there are scholars who will explain the information to them.
The reporters from the Washington State Journal were the ones asking questions to the new decision-maker at the press conference. They supported the team of the previous decision-maker, so naturally they would embarrass the new decision-maker's team.
They also just got the news.
With the rapid advancement of cutting-edge technology, many people are concerned about technology-related research and are also aware of the debate between antimatter theory and annihilation particle theory.
The conflict between the two theories does not lie in whether antimatter exists, but in whether antimatter was created or the phenomenon of annihilation particles occurred in the "Prior Sacrifice Explosion".
If the phenomenon of annihilation particles occurs, antimatter must not have been created.
vice versa.
The two theories are very similar at the experimental level, but the annihilation particle theory extends into the 'tachyon theory'.
"If the tachyon theory can be proven, it will naturally prove the annihilation particle theory. Then what appears in the explosion is the phenomenon of annihilation particles. Naturally, there is no creation of antimatter."
"The implications of this conclusion are huge."
"The basis of Korana's antimatter research is that what is created in the explosion is antimatter, and what occurs is the ability of positive and antimatter to offset each other, and their theoretical basis is antimatter theory."
"In other words, their research is fundamentally wrong, which will lead to major deviations in the calculation of experimental data."
"Now the accident happened, six people have died so far..."
"At the same time, it also caused extremely heavy losses!"
The current problem is no longer just an experimental accident, it has turned to the support of antimatter research, the scientific and technological support of new decision-makers, and the direction of research.
These are the words used by ‘opponents’ to criticize the new decision-making team.
After the press conference, the Washington State Journal reporter and other colleagues excitedly discussed, "That is true news. You can see the announcement on the official website of the Institute of High Energy."
"We have talked with professional scholars. The creation of tachyons has verified the annihilation particle theory. Antimatter does not exist in explosion accidents."
"In other words, Korana's research was wrong from the beginning."
"They conducted research based on wrong theories, and as a result, bigger explosion accidents occurred..."
"Just now the new decision-maker said congratulations on the new results. Can it be understood that he is happy that the annihilation particle theory has been verified? It can also be understood that he has denied the direction of antimatter research?"
"It can even be said that he doesn't care about the explosion at all?"
"really interesting……"
At the same time, the new decision-maker also knew the meaning of the reporter's question. He knew that he had "fell into the trap" and immediately became very angry.
Because the team's news is indeed one step behind.
Now the media reporters have learned about the announcement of the Institute of High Energy Energy, but they have only just learned about it, which is obviously a step too late.
But things have come to this, and there is nothing we can do about it.
He summoned people from the think tank and asked, "So, based on that information, tachyons were created. Does this mean that the annihilation particle theory was confirmed?"
Someone said, "We have just asked Professor Boers. If the public experiment is true, it means that the phenomenon of annihilation particles occurred in the explosion."
"In this regard, Wang Hao's team has a complete set of theories."
"As for Korana's research, the theoretical basis is antimatter, and many calculations are performed based on antimatter theory... This is probably the reason why the explosion occurred."
The new decision-maker asked, "Since energy is all erupting, can we continue research?"
Others also started thinking.
Many theories in physics are public, but they are not completely public. If you want to rely on the theories studied by other teams to do completely new research, you will definitely pay a lot of trial and error costs.
This is mainly because the theory is imperfect.
The cause of the accident now is "calculation deviation". Both theories convert mass into energy, but there are still differences in the calculation of basic data, which leads to the explosion of higher intensity energy in the experiment, and experimental accidents occur.
.
Someone said, "You can still study it without perfecting the theory."
This chapter is not over yet, please click on the next page to continue reading! "In addition to the factor of calculation deviation, Trana is still eager for success, and formulated high-intensity energy experiments without perfect safety measures."
"Our investigation team has already asked, and someone initially raised objections to the experiment."
"The study should have started from the lowest energy intensity. Of course it is possible if we continue in this direction, but because there is no perfect theory, there may still be some problems in the future."
The new decision-maker rubbed his forehead vigorously. The question before him was what to do next? The explosion will slowly subside.
As long as Trainor takes responsibility, it's his fault in the first place.
So will they continue to support relevant research?
The annihilation particle theory was proposed by Wang Hao's team. They do not have complete theoretical content and may encounter various problems if they continue to study it.
The team started discussing again.
Someone said, "The information from the Institute of High Energy is not necessarily true."
"There is a debate in the physics community right now. There are many distrustful voices, including some top physicists. They believe that the experiment may be falsified, or there may be data calculation errors."
"After all, it involves a strong annihilation force field."
"This is a brand-new technology, so it's not surprising that problems will arise. They haven't announced the specific content of the experiment."
During the discussion, scientific advisor Peloso Janilson suddenly said, "I have discussed with my colleagues, and one thing is clear regarding technical issues."
Everyone else looked over.
New policymakers are also curious about what Peloso-Jannelson will say.
"During the experiment, they created a large area of ​​strong regional annihilation force field. This kind of regional field force has a large range and cannot be created just by relying on magnetic intervention."
"Then there must be new technology."
"We are all more inclined to the previous judgment of Kolot James - DC annihilation field technology!"
The new decision-maker felt familiar with the 'DC annihilation force field technology'. He thought about it carefully and asked immediately, "I remember that at that research meeting, I supported Kubo and Corot James to allow them to have greater success.
You have the authority to use the project team’s funds, right?”
The others nodded in unison.
The new decision-maker asked, "They are studying DC, right? How is the research going?"
The office was silent.
Someone pursed his lips hard, but still said, "Because of Corana's research, Cooper and James' DC direction has been suspended."
"So it's still because of Corana?"
"Yes."
To be continued...