Chapter nine hundred and twentieth film review (may not
It has to be said that the box office of "Iron Man" is indeed rising crazily, but as the American Music Festival is approaching, on the other side, the other two movies are also promoting like crazy, and they also want to make the box office get another hit.
A surge in one aspect.
The movie "The Hobbit" originally received approval from others at the box office, and its box office performance was actually not too weak compared to Iron Man. Therefore, at this time, "The Hobbit 1" can be said to have been praised by countless
people appreciate it.
On the other hand, the movie "The Hobbit" was highly praised by the famous film critic Clarient.
His movie review is like this -----
"Why I say this movie is better than The Lord of the Rings"
"As if I couldn't wait to prove to the whole theater that I was the nerdiest one, I skipped work on the day of the release and went to see Hobbit. After I came back, the British basically asked me the following three questions:
How about it?
Should I watch 2D or 3D?
Which one is better than The Lord of the Rings?
The answer to the first question: Great. This movie carries so much, and I think the best thing is that it embodies human imagination to an unprecedented level. dale, erebor and vendell's
CG has achieved a level of perfection, especially when Vendell emerged from the valley, and the waterfalls surrounding the cliffs sparkled in the setting sun. I think that scene could have made Tolkien himself cry.
For the answer to the second question, if you have the conditions, please look at 3dimaxhfr, but if it is an ordinary screen, I think 3D is of little significance.
As for the third question, my answer is, I think it surpasses the original version of The Lord of the Rings. There are many factors. First of all, you have to consider your own issues. When the original version of The Lord of the Rings came out, I was just a little kid with crappy aesthetics.
My love for soil is even lower than it is now, and I know almost nothing about British culture. I didn’t do any homework when watching the first two movies. But before watching Hobbit this time, I discussed it with the British in the office.
Nearly two months, this is also the second possible factor, that is, I watched Hobbit in the UK. Tolkien may be just a pastime for China. It is not considered a foreign literature, but in the UK, he is a cultural figure.
Part of it has seeped into everyone's blood. People who you think are least likely to read fantasy literature can actually talk about Middle-earth with you.
And I think the most important reason, and the reason why I initially despised The Hobbit, is that it cut a small book into three movies.
Once again, I want to review my preconceptions. Although I don’t know how much I have suffered on this point, I admit that I am the only one who said, "Lord of the Rings is written one by one. Children's literature like The Hobbit was actually cut into
"Three movies, PJ is a fool who is working with Warner Bros. to defraud money." Many people had the same idea as me at first. And this idea is more or less based on a basic idea: The original Lord of the Rings is already very good, just shoot it like that
No, that's fine. PJ must have an ulterior motive for doing something else. No matter what, the Hobbit movie can't be better than this one.
And reality slapped me hard in the face.
Cutting a book into three gives the opportunity for every little detail in the Hobbit book to be shown. Some details do not even come from The Hobbit, such as Balin explaining the name of Thorin Oakenshield to everyone.
The origin part actually comes from rotk, but I am satisfied with this insertion. Some people may say that it is cheesey and deliberately sensational. Whatever, I like it.
And the pleasure brought by this grasp of every small detail reminded me of the shortcomings of the original Lord of the Rings and awakened those things that I was dissatisfied with at the time. For example, I told Fufu that Eowyn was in Rotk's movie
She is completely described as a fangirl. The space is limited and there is too little foreshadowing. One second she was fighting against the Human Emperor, but the next second she saw the prime minister on the wall of Gondor and immediately climbed up. And even omitted
The result of missing a large part of Fara's and Eowyn's previous life experiences and psychological activities is that even if the heartfelt exchange of words on the wall is fully expressed, it is just like the confession downstairs in the university dormitory, artificial and abrupt.
Of course, this is just an example, and it makes no sense to compare Hobbit with the original story. Compared with the majestic momentum of the original story, the overall layout of Hobbit is much smaller, which is destined to focus on the main plot compared to the original story.
The focus on detail is more suitable for Hobbit. This shooting method also leaves many challenges for pj. The one I care about the most is the Battle of the Five Armies. Compared with Minas Tirith and Helm's Deep, it is more like
**Silk group fight. How to achieve sensory impact without exaggerating the original. I am looking forward to it. The first part of The Hobbit at least gave me the confidence to look forward to it."
Because of Coriant's character, this film review subsequently received support from countless people.
"A new journey, but full of memories. The peaceful and fruitful Shire has a trendy version of the talkative Bilbo; the beautiful forest valley, Elrond and the Queen still don't eat the fireworks of the world (they only eat vegetable salad); dry
Tofu still likes to dazzle people with large light bulbs of several thousand watts, and Gollum is still hateful and pitiful. The encounter with the stone formation when crossing the cliff is like a replica of the Snowy Mountains, and the imax 48 frame doubles the disgust of Oaks. For the idiot fans, just make 30 more movies
I will chase you too!"
"The movie didn't start with all the familiar characters appearing, but they took turns appearing like old friends. Until Gollum appeared, all the memories came flooding out and collapsed... Although it felt too similar to "The Lord of the Rings", in the end
One hour of excitement is enough to rekindle passion after the previous work has cooled down. A new chapter, start again, "all encounters in the world are indeed reunions after a long absence."
"It's really great. I think that although the plot is not as broad as The Lord of the Rings, splitting a book into three movies gives pj the best opportunity to restore every detail in the original work, and every one of them
The details carry too much emotion. Tears welled up in my eyes as soon as the opening theme song played, and every tearful moment after that. Primordial, Song of the Lonely Mountain, Sunvendell, Galadriel's glorious turn. And
Wind King..."
…
It has to be said that the powerful navy plays a huge role at this time. In their view, as long as the publicity of "The Hobbit 1" is maximized, other aspects can be ignored.
But one thing that the Americans who have always been unfavorable in the past has forgotten is that this time there is not only "The Hobbit" in theaters, but also "Minority Report" and "Iron Man 2"
"The two movies also gave "The Hobbit 1" a higher level of change.
Many people are even angry about the mercenary trolls in "The Hobbit"!
"It's so ugly! I think it's boring to just walk around in Lord of the Rings. In this movie, keep walking around, people gather together, and your mother sings and blows smoke rings to film the mv... The Elf Queen also stands on a rotating tray and spins around in circles.
I squirted so much soda that I thought the magicians from 60 years ago would have been more powerful, but they were just dumb. In the end, they were rescued by eagles. Why not just throw the orc into the valley? And there was an eagle who rode a damn horse up a damn mountain and flew straight away.
ah.."
"At 169 minutes, the whole film has no convincing plot, and it inevitably seems a bit long. There is too much self-explanation, and the paving for the grand world view is slightly insufficient. In addition, the time is a bit long, and the impression of the first three films has been blurred.
Already."
"Minus 250. I couldn't bear it. It was really boring, so I watched the same movie in two halls and compared the difference between the so-called 48 frames and the normal screen. The difference is that 48 frames is more like watching a TV series on a large computer screen. An online game.
Opening animation."
"It's smelly, long, and really ugly. Maybe I'm really too old to appreciate this kind of movie. The dwarfs were ugly enough when they appeared, but after the monsters came out later, I suddenly felt that the dwarves have become handsome guys. Is the director deliberately disgusting the audience?"
When the monster with the tumor on his chin appeared, I really wanted to vomit. I hung the 3D glasses on the bridge of my nose for nearly three hours, and it felt like my nose was collapsed. And English is really the lingua franca of the world. It is popular as far away as Middle Earth.
Speaks English.”
…………
It has to be said that no matter in any era, the audience is very discerning, and it is precisely because of this that many people have no other reaction to the promotion of "The Hobbit 1".
In their opinion, this movie is simply rubbish, and rubbish movies are not worth watching.
Amid all this publicity, the box office of "Iron Man 2" surged upwards, and many people also praised "Iron Man" crazily.
"1. On the recent global premiere of "Iron Man 2", as a die-hard fan who admires Iron Man very much, I decisively bought the first show ticket. As a result, this movie became my exclusive myth.
I also deeply understand the benefits of watching a movie alone. I don’t need to spend time explaining the ins and outs to fans of pseudo-movies, and I can freely enjoy my excitement without worrying about being looked down upon by those around me. The most important thing is that I can still feel free to do so.
Communicate with the screening room in a timely manner, for example, the picture is blurry, the sound effects are weak, don’t rush to turn on the lights and leave after the subtitles are finished, there are Easter eggs, etc.
2. The overall plot of "Iron Man 2" adopts a multi-clue structure. It needs to explain Iron Man's whiplash, Stark Industries, Congress and the military, and Tony Stark's search for new energy to maintain his lifespan in just two hours.
The predecessor of the Avengers organization, the turbulence of Stark Industries after Pepper Potts was promoted to CEO, and many other themes were a bit difficult. The result of this is that the entire film has a large capacity, but the focus is not clear enough. This reminds me of that year.
"Spider-Man 3" tried to break through from multiple angles but was wildly criticized by fans.
3. One of the highlights of the film is the briefcase, which is called "ca-colored" in the film. It is not until the critical moment that its true function is revealed - a portable version of the Iron Man armor (appeared in this trailer)
.Movie fans shouted accordingly that Iron Man is becoming more and more like Transformers.
4. I praise Scarlett Johansson’s new role as Black Widow (a female agent of S.H.E.I.L.D.)! In addition to Scarlett’s unique temperament and beauty, the look of Black Widow created by costume designer maryzophers is also great.
Quite exquisite, better than the original comics
5. The most blatant product placement in "Iron Man 2" is this scene: Stark leisurely lies on his side on a giant advertising prop of a certain brand of bagels and eats. The setting of this plot is designed to amuse you.
It was a pleasure, so I endured it for the time being.
6. In terms of guest appearances, Iron Man's guest appearances are very powerful, whether he comes to play a supporting role (he has been active in "Spider-Man", "Fantastic Four", and the third season of "The Big Bang Theory" many times before)
(Intrusion). Stevenwong said that in this scene of the opening of the Stark Industry Expo, he saw the CEO of Oracle. I really didn’t know this person, but I did hear Oracle.
7. Regarding Hammer Industries, a competitor of Stark Industries. The name Hammer comes from the English literal translation of hammer. Why hammer? I am not responsible for gossip research. In Marvel Comics' 2009 short story collection "Dark Reign"
, Iron Man was suspended from the S.H.I.E.L.D. organization due to his unfavorable role in the "Secret Invasion" incident. Spider-Man's enemy Green Goblin stole Iron Man's armor and made it himself
He bought a set of steel shirts, called himself "Iron Captain America", and reorganized Aegis (s.h.e.i.l.d) into "H.A.M.M.E.R.". This S.H.E.I.L.D. was called H.A.M.M.E.R.
So there are three possibilities: 1) The screenwriter is paving the way for future Avengers movies, and this Hammer is likely to make a comeback and become a sponsor of the Skyhammer organization. 2) The screenwriter feels that the end of 2012 is coming, and the Avengers movie cannot be filmed like Dark Reign
, so I borrowed the name Tianchui. 3) It hurts me to think too much.
8. Pay attention to the thing placed on the table in this scene (the film even gives a certain amount of space, Stark calls it a "ferris wheel"). I read in a book that this seems to be an eternal thing.
The motivation model was invented by the Indian philosopher Bhaskara in 1150. The principle is to use the imbalance of the weight when the wheel rotates to keep it returning to its original position.
9. In the scene where Stark was modifying the hardware system to create new elements, he once took a disc-shaped object and placed it under the laser transmitter. The SHIELD official was extremely surprised and said, "You don't know this.
"What does it mean?" What does this broken disc-shaped object with a five-pointed star in the middle mean?
That’s Captain America’s most iconic buckler! (It’s still paving the way for next year’s “Captain America” and 2012’s “Avengers”)
10. Regarding the Easter eggs after the subtitles of the movie. After the subtitles went up in the cinema, I sat there for six minutes, waiting for the Easter eggs after the subtitles. It even made the projection staff and the cleaning staff very dissatisfied. Unexpectedly, there was no more content after the subtitles.
, the theater manager’s explanation was that the film copy was already like this when it was brought from China Film Group. This fully shows that China Film Group did not do enough homework.
…………
Another aspect caused by the craziness of "Iron Man" is that the Grammy Music Festival has been postponed. (To be continued, please search Piaotian Literature, the novel is better and updated faster!