The cover comes from Weibo’s wife lisass, and is authorized to be used as the cover.
This article is a new one, and I will probably write it for several years to lighten my mood.
Highlights:
1. If you are pro-Slytherin, the male protagonist is likely to be Draco, who has a neutral view of Harry.
2. There are a lot of private settings, and the original references will be marked. Some of them may be too lazy to mark or have forgotten.
3. In my eyes, Harry is a student who excels in sports (very good at Quidditch), has an average level of magic, and is good at spells (he has too many teachers to teach him one-on-one, he is also a Horcrux, and he has many thrilling practices
experience.)
He is a good boy, but he is not a genius.
4.【Draw the key points】!!!!!!
Treat the Dursleys objectively.
In 1991, the British economy was in recession and the industrial index stagnated. The situation was actually quite bad.
Some readers only talk about good foreign policies, such as education subsidies and childbirth subsidies... Please, please, please look at the era.
The UK has a lot of green papers, its finances are in a mess, and there is no supply at all.
In the 1990s, most schools did not have free lunches. According to the 1904 Education Law, some public schools could provide lunches to poor students (some, public, poor).
Schools that can provide lunches have to raise tuition fees (even triggering several demonstrations by parents to protest).
As for the child-rearing subsidy...oh, whether you can receive this thing or not is another matter.
Therefore, if you can't accept the fact that Harry living in Petunia's house is a burden to them (even though they took Harry's inheritance and didn't pay a single galleon in support), you don't need to read it.
[This is the key point, read it for me!!!] I’m really annoyed that some people start to criticize without understanding anything. Is it because it’s popular nowadays for virgins to raise babies?
Only someone who is considerate and devoted and gives everything is worthy of being the savior?
Okay, let’s bring the topic back.
Dursley was in sales (perhaps a sales manager) and only Vernon had any income in the family.
In this family, Harry has of course endured hardships and been wronged. But it’s outrageous to take someone else’s contribution as a matter of course.
Harry is even a troublemaker - he has had magical riots in school (in the original book) more than once. Readers with children can put themselves in the shoes of the teacher and think about the pain of calling their parents every day.
In addition, Harry is a freak. His parents died mysteriously (for ordinary people), so he was adopted because of Dumbledore's intimidation. But don't ordinary people really need to be afraid?
The Dursleys are not upright good people, and Dudley is also a bad boy, but regardless of whether they are active or passive, their family has protected Harry for many years. Dudley also saved Harry when he grew up.
So, in my book, they are not villains.
5. This book is a second creation based on the original work by a fan. There is no outline. You can read it wherever you go.
If you don't like it, just quit without any charges.
The magical world is very interesting, and the filter in the magical world is also very thick.
A few years ago, when I wrote novels and read them, everyone could accept them, whether they were pro-Slytherin, pro-Gryffindor, or Hufflepuff-Ravenclaw.
The protagonist can be male, female, human or demon, and can fall in love with Harry, Draco, Snape, and even Voldemort. Everyone only cares about whether it looks good or not, and never demands perfection.
I really miss it.
Of course, I also like those Baoer who keep up with the updates every day, and I like them very much.
In short, this book is based on the author's own thoughts. If you have different opinions or policy errors, please feel free to discuss and correct them.
But please retain your wisdom and refuse to point fingers and be self-righteous.
