Wow, I feel like I have mastered the traffic password!
Wow, he feels like he has the traffic password!
It is said that when he wrote that chapter, he thought it would be controversial, but he did not expect it to be so controversial.
When he came back from playing games on a daily basis, he saw that the icon of the Writer's Leg app showed more than fifty red dots. He felt that he had mastered the traffic password (make a fist)!
He saw a comment that said well: "There are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand people." Everyone must have different thoughts after reading that chapter. Some praise and reward, while others must have a bad impression.
.
First, some personal opinions:
1. There is a passage about the description of the "butcher's knife" that was indeed a mistake on his part. He made a small adjustment to the description of the "butcher's knife". Now, after adjusting the content of the beginning section, the comment about that passage has disappeared, so
There are two bosses who are having a heated argument, and it’s really not him who deleted the comments.
2. Regarding the setting of justice value and crime value, it is really not a bug, nor is it because he was confused when writing it.
In the past dozens of chapters, he has foreshadowed the story many times, showing the protagonist's "puzzle", "lack of information", and "plain treatment".
To put it bluntly, the guilt value is just a statistic. If it is of no use, he will just throw it away.
But our feedback was not good, so he made some adjustments. The first was the most obvious "health value", which completely conflicted with his original setting after modification.
Then [Deprecated] is.
[Actually, what he doesn’t quite understand is that he will make mistakes and write bugs. Usually after a reader points them out, he will make reasonable modifications as soon as possible]
Even in Chapter 89, he was afraid that the clues would be separated for too long, so he deliberately listed the scattered clues in the form of 1/2/3 and emphasized them again. (I can also think of him as the number of words)
In Chapter 92, a few digital book friends suggested that if they all seek to increase the sin value, wouldn’t it limit the protagonist too much? Because it involved the core content of Chapter 93, he could answer in a vague way, "It will break the camel's back."
The last straw”.
Just like "health points", when he first designed the [panel], he didn't think about the word count, but also based on two considerations. One is to make the protagonist's growth have a sense of ladder, and the other is that every attribute is
It has "great use".
In fact, the first time he showed his guilt value and someone raised questions, he gave a vague explanation. The foreshadowing was buried in Chapters 4 and 5 of this book.
He is not a fool, nor does he have trouble with money. He dares to write about such an obvious problem, which proves that it is not a simple problem.
Therefore, if the "Evil Value" thing really had a bug, it would have been abandoned long ago.
Including that chapter, the protagonist's "complaints" about returning to the room to watch the panel were deleted, as well as the protagonist's "complaints" at the end of this chapter. There is no difference in the whole text.
I deliberately mentioned that "bug" again and again, "knowingly", because that is [the whole book], one of the few [big foreshadowings], and it runs through the whole book.