On the other side, major news media quickly compiled information related to the report meeting.
There has once again been a wave of discussion on the Internet.
[Laughing to death, this Washington Times is really interesting. After being slapped in the face once by Professor Tao, he came to China and was slapped a second time by Sichuan God.]
[I’ve only seen Qianli Send, not Wanli Send.]
[Kawashen: Since you want to take the initiative to send your face to me, I will help you! This sounds so cool! 】
[I feel that it is too arrogant. After all, I am a guest from afar, and the questions are raised at the report meeting. It is enough to point out the mistakes. There is no need to step on people like this, right? 】
[Yo yo yo, the legitimate guest is here! Why don’t you see which piece of rubbish was the first to chase after Professor Xu and bite him? 】
[There is no way, after all, in their eyes, the person asking the question is a distinguished foreigner (manual dog head)]
[What I think is even more domineering is that Professor Xu announced on the podium that he would cancel the patent authorization for artificial SEI films in South Korea! It feels like one person is challenging a country! He is so domineering!]
[By the way, isn’t the Washington Times from the United States? Why is it banning South Korea? 】
[Because the financial sponsor behind it is from South Korea, and the purpose of its creation is to disgust our country. If you don’t believe it, you can read this media and see what he has done in the past.]
With reports from major news media, the Washington Times has once again caught the attention of netizens.
It has to be said that the operation of the technology editor Andrew Whitt was indeed explosive, allowing the "Washington Times" to gain a lot of traffic.
Of course, this traffic is almost all black traffic, and all of it is scolding.
But for the "Washington Times", they don't care whether the traffic is black.
Anyway, they don’t have much reputation, and one black fan has ten fans! The black fans can bring more circle-breaking effects than fans.
As for Xu Chuan's threat to them at the report meeting, to be honest, the Washington Times didn't take it seriously from top to bottom.
I even think that this is just absorbing the heat for them.
Just when everyone at the Washington Times was feeling smug and smug about the success of the plan, a phone call came to the office.
The editor-in-chief reached out and took the phone. The person calling him was the financial backer behind the Washington Times.
Before he could report the good news about the surge in media traffic, a storm of curses came from the other end of the phone.
"Xiba!"
"Bastards, do you want to die? You are a bunch of bastards."
In the office, the editor-in-chief of the "Washington Times" was like a cucumber seedling in a greenhouse that was suddenly hit by a violent storm after being transplanted to an open space, and he suddenly died.
Listening to the curse on the phone, he wanted to retort, but you agreed to do so at the time.
But he didn't dare. If the funders behind it withdrew their capital and stopped providing blood transfusions to them, I'm afraid the newspaper would go bankrupt tomorrow.
In this way, the editor-in-chief was like a little turtledove in a storm, facing the curse without moving but not daring to move.
"Now! Immediately! Give me a formal public apology to Professor Xu! If the authorization of the artificial SEI film cannot be restored! I will kill you one by one! You bitch! Xiba!"
After cursing for a long time and throwing out the last words, the financial backer ‘Moon Sun Myung’ who called me hung up the phone.
Listening to the blind tone coming from the cell phone, the editor-in-chief's chest kept heaving. After being scolded, he was naturally equally angry.
Not just angry, he needs to publicly and formally apologize to that person.
This made him feel humiliated one after another.
"Fire! Fire Andrew Whitt immediately and blame everything on him!"
The angry editor-in-chief couldn't find a good place to vent his anger, so he could only blame everything on the technology editor Andrew Whitt.
Andrew Whitt, who was still in China, soon found himself directly unemployed.
On the other side, MDPI publishers in Basel, Switzerland, the operator of the Entropy journal, quickly investigated the Entropy journal under their own name after the news media fermented it on the Internet.
After confirming that there was indeed a submission document by Professor Jiang Kangcai of Rice University in the Entropy journal, Entropy magazine was quickly ordered to withdraw the relevant paper.
Not to mention that Xu Chuan pointed out problems with this paper in terms of mathematical physics at the report meeting. Even if there were no problems that caused the journal to fall into such a big turmoil, the paper would be quickly withdrawn and pending processing.
As for the results, it can be said that most of the retracted papers have almost no chance of being published in any type of journal.
After the report meeting, Xu Chuan stopped paying attention to these things.
He had too much to do and no time to bother with a notorious journal.
Although the report meeting on the NS equation has ended, the peer review has not yet been completed.
During peer review, the reporter of the paper is required to address any normal questions raised by the reviewer.
But for Xu Chuan, he needs to complete the peer review before the end of this month and then go to the capital for a meeting.
Because the 2019 academician co-optation meeting will be held at the end of December, and the biennial academician co-optation list will be announced to the outside world. And he has already received an invitation letter specially sent to him by Zheng Hai. (PS, I seem to be here.
I made a mistake about the time for the co-optation of academicians. In China, it seems to have started in January 2019. I misunderstood it as the end of the year. Forget it, let’s just treat it as a parallel world.)
So he can either complete the peer review of the NS equation by the end of December, or he can take a leave of absence at the end of December and attend a conference first.
As for the specific choice, to be honest, it does not depend on him, but on the speed of peer review.
On the second day after the report meeting, a nine-member review team consisting of four people in the field of partial differential equations, including Tao Zhexuan, Fefferman, and Qiu Chengtong, two in the field of topology, two in the field of fluid mechanics, and one from the Clay Institute of Mathematics,
Then the review of proof papers for NS equations was launched.
The lineup is quite luxurious, and it also has the largest number of peer reviewers in history.
Even for the Poincaré conjecture and Hodge conjecture that Perleman and Xu Chuan proved respectively last time, there were only six peer reviewers.
The reason why it evolved to nine this time is because the NS equation involves fluid mechanics in the field of physics, so two experts in fluid mechanics were added.
However, although the number of reviewers has increased, the review speed is quite fast, and there are not many questions that Xu Chuan needs to answer.
Especially on the 'microelement construction method', a key new tool for solving NS equations, it can be said that almost no one has raised questions or opinions, and no one has suggested where it can be optimized.
For all members of the Fields Medal team involved in reviewing the manuscript, this mathematical tool is as perfect as it was made in heaven.
It is like a work of art, so beautiful that people are addicted to it.
However, during the proof process using this tool, they found some minor flaws.
If compared with other reviewed papers in the past, there is no doubt that this paper on the proof of the last step of the NS equation can be said to be top-notch.
But if you put it in front of the mathematical tool of 'microelement construction method', it is just like other snow peaks next to Mount Everest. Although it is equally tall, the light of Mount Everest will always be incomparable to other peaks.
The existence and smoothness of the solution to the NS equation prove that the peer review of the paper will be faster than Xu Chuan expected.
He originally estimated that it would take at least a month, but in less than twenty days, the peer review team officially announced that the paper on the proof of the NS equation that had been notified him had passed the review.
A total of four people came to announce the results, including Professor Fefferman, the representative of the peer review team, the representative of the Clay Mathematics Institute, Shigefumi Mori, the chairman of the International Mathematical Union Committee, and the editor-in-chief of "New Advances in Mathematics"
Robert.
Of course, on this occasion, there are media reporters behind me.
After the four people shook hands with Xu Chuan enthusiastically, the chairman of the International Mathematical Union Committee, Shigebumi Mori, straightened his clothes, coughed slightly, and said solemnly:
"It has been confirmed by the peer review panel, the International Mathematical Union Committee and the Clay Mathematics Institute that your paper "On the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, proof of the existence and smoothness of the solutions" has passed the peer review
and final review.”
"From today on, we have found a smooth solution to the NS equation, and we have also confirmed that within the fluid motion region, the corresponding ideal fluid is the solution to the initial boundary value problem of the Euler equation!"
"From today on, the overall existence of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations when the initial values are infinitely smooth, the divergence is zero and there are compact supports (no restrictions on the initial values and the size of the region)!"
"From today on, we have also gained a perfect mathematical tool, which can build a great bridge between differential equations, topological structures and partial differential equations, allowing latecomers to pass without worries."
"From today on, this problem that spanned three centuries has come to a perfect end in your hands."