Chapter 804 Fortunately, we still have Professor Xu Chuan
In the assembly hall, the flood of applause stopped.
After the one-hour reporting work is completely completed, the next step is the crucial acceptance work.
Especially when a result is controversial, the academic community will be extremely cautious in accepting it.
Although there are all kinds of birds in the forest, overall, the academic community's tolerance for academic misconduct such as fraud and plagiarism is still very low.
At the reporting table, Xu Chuan took a deep breath and looked at the acceptance team and the big guys sitting in the front row.
"That's the basic situation."
"About 'Experimental analysis data and Dalitz diagram of coupling constants for strong electric symmetry breaking', do you have any questions?"
There was silence under the stage.
No one raised their hand to ask a question.
It's not that there are no questions, but everyone is waiting for the first person to ask a question.
After all, this re-acceptance of the coupling constant for strong electric symmetry breaking involves a dispute between the two major physics institutions, CERN and CRHPC.
And more importantly, this is the core prediction data of the unified theory of strong electricity.
Faced with a question of this level, who dares to stand up and ask questions since none of the big guys in the front row have asked?
The atmosphere was quiet for a few seconds. Professor Stephen Herget, who was sitting in the front row and rushed over from CERN, was the first to raise his right hand.
He is a student of Professor Roger Penrose, and is also a Nobel Prize-level scholar. He has been nominated for the Nobel Prize several times, but unfortunately he has not received it so far.
This time I came here partly because I was interested, and partly because I came here to replace his mentor, Professor Penrose. The latter is now over ninety years old, and his physical condition is getting worse day by day, and it is difficult for him to travel thousands of miles from Europe to
Come here.
Seeing that the first scholar raised his hand, Xu Chuan did not hesitate and directly extended his hand to signal the other person to ask a question.
Professor Stephen Herget stood up, took the microphone from the staff, tried it to make sure it was OK, and then said:
"Hello, Professor Xu Chuan, regarding the acceptance of coupling constants for strong electric symmetry breaking, I noticed in the analysis data that there are mass spectra of heavy and light hadrons and meson decay data of different excitations of strong decays. Could you please give me more details?
Can you explain this?"
"Are the mass spectra of heavy and light hadrons and the different excitation meson decay data of strong decays?"
Xu Chuan repeated the sentence habitually, nodded, withdrew his gaze and adjusted the PPT document to the point where Professor Stephen Herget asked the question.
"...Possible 1d and 2S states d, d, strong decay of mesons require p parity and c parity conservation. However, the strong decay of heavy and light mesons is different, it must satisfy p parity
Weigh conservation and heavy quark symmetry requirements.”
"The symmetry of heavy quarks allows two heavy and light mesons (same orbit and radial excitation) with the same z (I refers to the angular momentum of the light quark, p to be parity) to have extremely similar decay properties."
"These two mesons form the so-called "double state". For example, the pseudostandard meson (0ˉ) and the vector meson (Iˉ) in the orbital ground state (s wave) form the so-called "h" double state..."
"The calculation formula is: e=Mc ?σL/2 2?·KLˉ?·m?d... Finally, the mass and experimental value of the corresponding state are given by the obtained parameters."
"Do you have any other questions?"
In the audience, Professor Stephen Herget stared at the data on the blackboard and fell into deep thought. It took a while before he came back to his senses and replied quickly.
"that's all, thanks."
Xu Chuan nodded and then said: "Okay."
As Professor Stephen Herget started, other scholars in the venue also began to raise their hands to ask questions.
Compared with the analytical data and Dalitz diagram of coupling constants of strong electric symmetry breaking, more than 80% of the scholars who asked questions focused on quark clusters in high-energy level collision experiments.
On the breaking effect of gluons and void fields.
Not only because this is a new discovery that goes beyond the standard model, but also because the coupling constant verification data for strong electric symmetry breaking re-completed by CRHPC can be said to be almost flawless, with nothing to fault.
After all, this kind of inspection work does not require any innovative methods, and everyone knows the results in advance.
Even many top experts have obtained the complete analysis data, process and Dalitz chart a few days ago, and have already completed the verification.
Therefore, it is almost impossible to find fault with it theoretically.
Even if some scholars have raised relevant questions in a targeted manner, they are basically raised because they are not familiar with and understand some mathematical methods in the process of analyzing data.
Not all physicists can understand advanced mathematics like Xu Chuan or Witten.
The fact is exactly the opposite. Although it is often said that mathematics and physics are not divided into different disciplines, most physicists also understand some data and can use mathematical abilities to solve some problems encountered in their own research.
But under normal circumstances, the mathematical knowledge used by most physicists is basically the result of research ten or twenty years ago, or even in the last century.
Therefore, not everyone can understand Xu Chuan’s mathematical work in the coupling constant verification and analysis data of strong electric symmetry breaking in a short time.
And for these, Xu Chuan is not stingy.
For every question, he explained the mathematical tools and principles behind it in as much detail as possible, so as to encourage more people to understand these and promote the development of physics.
The question-and-answer session lasted for more than an hour. When the experts in the front row and the acceptance group composed of representatives of physicists from various countries completed their questions, the acceptance report meeting was almost completed.
When Xu Chuan stepped down from the reporting stage, and when Professor Sheldon Glashow, the representative of the acceptance team, came on stage and announced that the analytical data of coupling constants of strong electric symmetry breaking of CRHPC had passed the acceptance, the whole venue was filled with thunderous cheers.
applause.
This chapter is not finished yet, please click on the next page to continue reading the exciting content! There is no doubt that if the CRHPC acceptance report passes the review, it means that there is something wrong with the results of Professor Fox of Stanford University at CERN.
Whether there is fraud or not is another matter for the time being, but whether it has been published on the CERN official website, included in the CERN institutional results library, or published in "Nature·Physics", it is certain that the paper will be rejected.
The academic community will not tolerate an erroneous paper being publicly displayed in front of the public. This is the most basic academic ethics and the most basic academic rules.
...
The acceptance report on the coupling constants of strong electric symmetry breaking was over. In the conference venue, the scholars who came to participate in the conference also began to leave under the organization and guidance of the staff.
Xu Chuan did not follow them, but left directly through the passage backstage.
After all, this is an international conference with thousands of people. Although the security measures have been taken very well, if something unexpected happens or a stampede occurs, the security team in charge may be worried from top to bottom.
They all have to be kicked off.
However, for other scholars, especially those top academic figures such as Edward Witten, David Gross, Sheldon Glashow and others, the luck is not so good.
As soon as these top experts in physics walked out of the venue, they were caught waiting in the hall by many media reporters who had not received invitations and could not enter the venue.
"Hello, Professor Glashow, I am a media reporter from CBS. I would like to ask how the acceptance report meeting of the coupling constant for strong electric symmetry breaking held by Professor Xu Chuan today went?"
Being blocked by media reporters, Sheldon Glashow had to slow down and answer questions by the way.
"A very smooth acceptance report. Professor Xu Chuan's verification of the coupling constant for strong electric symmetry breaking has successfully passed the acceptance of the CRHPC institution and the physics community."
Upon hearing this answer, the CBS reporter's eyes lit up, and he quickly asked questions.
"Then I would like to ask whether Professor Fox Haier's results are correct or Professor Xu Chuan's results? If the two results are the same, I think there is no need to verify it again, right?"
Hearing this question, Sheldon Glashow glanced at the reporter in front of him with some disgust: "Do you still need to ask this question?"
If Xu Chuan's results were wrong, how could they pass this acceptance report meeting?
And since Xu Chuan's re-verification results are correct, then there must be problems with Fox Haier's results.
How did you become a reporter with such a low IQ?
The media reporter from CBS laughed and continued to ask shamelessly: "In other words, there is something wrong with the data passed by Professor Fox at CERN, right?"
Glashow glanced at him and said in a calm tone: "Judging from the current collision data of both sides, it is obvious that Professor Fox's data is not perfect and there are problems."
He knew what the reporter was thinking when he asked, and he just wanted to get an accurate answer from him.
He didn't mind this very much.
This is indeed the case, and there is nothing that cannot be said.
The CBS reporter's eyes lit up and he asked: "Excuse me, what is the problem with Professor Fox's acceptance of the results? Can you briefly explain it to the public?"
Glashow thought for a while and said: "Although Professor Fox's acceptance data perfectly conforms to the predictions of the unified theory of strong electricity, his acceptance data lacks the most critical traces of the decay of quark groups, gluons and void fields.
"
"If there is a problem with Professor Fox's original data, then how did CERN pass a piece of problematic experimental data? Didn't everyone notice it?"
"Yes, this is a brand-new discovery, something that has never been discovered before in the physics community. Before Professor Xu Chuan re-verified the coupling constant of strong electric symmetry breaking, no one would have thought of the coupling constant at high energy levels.
Hitting quarks and gluons will cause void disruption."
After a slight pause, Glashow faced and continued: "I would like to thank Professor Xu Chuan for this. If he had not been keenly aware of the problems in Fox's experimental data, I am afraid that the physics community would have fallen into a crisis."
"It has to be said that from another perspective, Professor Fox's data is quite 'perfect', so perfect that neither the CERN acceptance team nor the many scholars who participated in the acceptance report meeting were aware of the problems in it."
"Fortunately, we still have Professor Xu Chuan."
...
The report meeting on the re-verification of coupling constants for strong electric symmetry breaking has not yet been completed, and the physics community has already started discussing it.
Because this acceptance report meeting is not just for scholars who come to participate, CTV and CRHPC institutions also broadcast the entire process live.
And more scholars who were unable to attend the acceptance report basically chose to watch the meeting online.
If Xu Chuan stood on the stage and announced that he had discovered traces that CERN had not explored, and believed that there were errors and loopholes in the data of Professor Fox Hale, the physics community was already involved in a controversy.
So when Professor Sheldon Glashow stood on the stage on behalf of the acceptance team and announced that the analytical data of coupling constants for strong electric symmetry breaking had passed the acceptance, the physics world completely exploded.
On the internationally renowned physics forum PhysicsForums, the relevant discussion threads have been established a few days ago, and intensive traffic is currently refreshing the relevant discussions.
[Professor Xu’s revalidation data has been verified, and there is really a problem with Professor Fox’s results!]
[I have guessed it a long time ago, but now I am even more curious about whether Professor Fox Hale’s data is falsified.]
[At the beginning of the acceptance report meeting, Professor Xu had already said that although he did not say it explicitly, there was no doubt that he was accusing Fox of falsifying data, at least some of the data. But there was not enough evidence, and Professor Xu also
It’s just not stated clearly.]
[Incredible, if I remember correctly, that Fox is a professor at Stanton University, right? He actually does this kind of thing? 】
[It’s normal to be tempted. You must know that this is a Nobel Prize-level achievement.]
[It’s not that experiments can’t be done, but that it’s more cost-effective to fake them! (Squints and smiles)]
[This kind of person is really hateful! If not discovered, the entire physics community will fall into a major crisis. The unified theory of strong electricity is the core cornerstone of the Standard Model!]
[I don’t know whether there is fraud or not. It may be that CERN’s collider is not powerful enough and the breaching effect was not observed.]
[I have said before that it is simply impossible to complete the 5sigma confidence level data of the coupling constant of strong electric symmetry breaking in two months. There is no other way except falsification. 】
[What do you think, CRHPC completed the 5sigma confidence verification in twenty days? Professor Xu also falsified?]
[Strongly recommend a strict investigation! No matter which party it is, they must strictly find out what the problem is! If it is fraud, it must be severely punished!]
...
PS: I have a holiday tomorrow, so I will add more updates to finish this plot! Please give me a monthly pass