"We have arrived at the intended target area, but there is not a single German stick here. What should we do now?"
You can say that the German guy has no work to do by pulling his hips, and of course you can also say that Malashenko overestimated the enemy's ability to work. Anyway, both descriptions have the same meaning: there was indeed no trace of anything at the final roundabout closing point.
The well-organized and organized German army set up defenses to resist. Strictly speaking, not even a German deserter was seen who was so frightened that he raised his hands to surrender.
"Continue to the next step, don't stop! The detour is completed, the return is not done yet, now go back and send these fascists on their way!"
Detours and detours are not Malashenko's stated tactical goal.
Penetrating into the front, back, sides and rear of the German army and reaching the predetermined target point can only be considered half of the process. The remaining half is of course to fight back. As for whether to annihilate the entire army or fight until they surrender, this is not what Malashenko wants.
One person can say it, but it depends on whether the German gunman who is nesting in the position with the sound of artillery fire not far away cherishes his life.
It is worth mentioning that the roundabout trip made by Malashenko did not meet up with the Varosha brigade troops at the other end.
Strictly speaking, this battle is not an encirclement, but a roundabout operation between two forces on the left and right with basically equal strength. When they reach their respective roundabout marking points, the first phase of the mission is completed.
The goal of the remaining second phase of the mission is also the same: continue to fight back, use a powerful assault force to penetrate from the weakest defense position of the Germans, and capture all the remaining chips in the Germans' hands that can continue to perform "hard work".
fell, thus declaring the final victory of this battle.
Compared with a single-direction frontal attack that gathers all offensive capabilities, Malashenko coordinated all the forces in his hands, unified command, and made a combat deployment of three routes, two detours, and one frontal attack, which is of course meaningful.
Even players who have played a basic FPS game know that whether you feel comfortable fighting one person while maintaining a line of fire, or when fighting against the person in front of you, if your buttocks on the left and right are stabbed at the same time, you feel more comfortable being shot on three sides.
, this is a very simple question that can be imagined with a little thought.
Furthermore, a leader division with large and abundant troops, whose combat capability is equivalent to that of a corps-level unit, cannot deploy all its troops on the frontal battlefield at one go under the premise of optimal combat efficiency.
Everyone knows the principle of marginal effect. When the number of troops invested in a fixed-width frontal battlefield reaches a certain upper limit, you can indeed gain gains by continuing to invest more troops in this limited battlefield width and further enhance offensive energy, but
The return ratio between this investment and feedback reporting is very low.
And after the battlefield width reaches saturation, the more you continue to invest, the lower it will be. Continuing to pile up numbers is very meaningless unless it is really necessary. Of course, it is also an easy mistake in high-intensity mechanized operations of large corps.
One question, the key depends on what is the optimal upper limit for saturation of this troop input.
This needs to be explored in actual combat after the synthetic adaptation that is completely different from the previous one is completed, at least in theory, this is the step-by-step sequence.
After all, after the completion of fully mechanized support, the combined operations of various arms are very different from traditional operations.
As for the saturation issue of how much troops should be invested in a certain battlefield width, naturally we cannot apply it mechanically based on previous experience. Everything has to be explored again. In theory, there will be a price to pay in the process of exploration, and wisdom will be gained through every experience.
Or gain experience and summarize improvements through bloody lessons, at least in theory, but this theory does not work for Comrade Ma.
Malashenko, who has a "collection of cheat codes" from the future in his head, is already familiar with the theories, tactics, essentials and codes of mechanized combined arms combat.
After all, it was a very complete and reliable set of all the precious exploration experiences accumulated and preserved by the Soviet military in later generations, which spanned the entire Cold War, the decades before its disintegration, and the efforts of several generations.
s things.
Even some embarrassing juniors once again used this set of things discovered by their ancestors to launch the eleventh Stalin assault on the Nazis.
As a result, due to various deceptive reasons such as the leader's lack of firm determination, hasty preparation of combat plans and underestimation of the enemy, he was branded a "bad" and his strategic performance was poor. However, he was still able to defeat the Nazis on the frontal tactical battlefield.
I dare not go out of the city to fight in the field, and I cannot take care of myself.
To be honest, the above work is not done well, but the lower part is still like this, which is enough to prove that some tactical things are really useful.
Malashenko took such a set of things that are still very useful after decades of use, and used them to adapt to local conditions, tinker with them realistically, and then modify them. Then he can really beat the crap out of him and stop it.
It's no joke to keep running thin.
The frontal battlefield is not wide enough, will it be saturated if too many troops are put in? It doesn't matter, I will just do frontal strong attacks and interspersed attacks.
No one said that the width of the battlefield cannot be expanded manually. I will open two more battlefields behind your German sticks, which are also called battlefield widths. I can still put the most effective troops into them, thus maximizing the acceleration of your group of spells.
Death of a Hiss Thug.
Moreover, I, Malashenko, know exactly what is the threshold for the highest effectiveness of investing in mechanized heavy troops. What are you Nazi fascist idiots going to do to fight me? Look, I will beat you all back to your mother’s womb right now.
Go inside!
The non-stop Malashenko smoothly integrated all the tactical arrangements. The infantry that broke into the front line of the position and the enemies who came over from the front battlefield caused the situation to be in chaos, and reinforcements were overwhelmed.
The German guy soon made a shocking discovery.
The two heavy Russian troops that had just penetrated the edge of the position and sent in a mass of infantry were now coming back from both the left and right rear directions at the same time.
He was beaten from the front, from the front left, from the front right, and the rear left and right rears were about to be beaten, and they were more vicious than the three directions in front of him, like a spiraling beating from his mother.
The width of the battlefield has been expanded to the point where it is almost a circular encirclement of the entire German defense block. It is almost like where there is a German defensive position, then there is a battlefield, and it is already or will be a battlefield soon.
At the moment when the real battlefield situation was fully understood, Major General Reinhardt in the half-buried command post was like a puppet with its strings cut off. He could not stand firmly, staggered on his feet, and instantly collapsed behind him.
On the chair, he was still mumbling words that even he himself didn't know the meaning of.
"It's too fast, how could this happen? Why on earth is it so fast...Why is this..."