It was my mistake. I forgot that some people may not know what Party A and Party B are at all. Forget it, this time I will explain the principle of coins by using grocery shopping that even elementary school students can understand. If there are still people who can't understand, then I will
I can only doubt my ability to understand...
First of all, it must be clear that the ability of the fantasy coin is "certain to be fired". There is no probability that it will cause the activation of its ability to fail, except for targeted elements, tags or abilities (which are not affected by other fantasy objects and cannot be used).
Apart from being selected as a target by other illusions, which can invalidate the activation of the illusion, etc.), there are only two situations - not enough goods, not enough money.
This is just like when you open a business, you can't refuse the transaction on the grounds of "you're too ugly", "I'm in a bad mood", "I just don't want to do your business", right? That's not a transaction, you're just looking for trouble.
.
It is easy to understand that there is not enough supply. The vegetable seller has sold out the radishes, so you will not be able to buy radishes from him no matter how much you spend, so the transaction will fail. (The transaction you propose must be something that the other party can do)
It's easy if you don't have enough money. For example, if you only pay 50 cents for a pound of radish, the vegetable seller doesn't have to sell it to you. (The implicit value of the coin is higher than the other party's price for the transaction)
Then there is the issue of price increases and price reductions:
It snows and freezes, and the price of vegetables rises. You have to buy it at the original price, and the vegetable seller does not need to sell it to you. Similarly, stale vegetables will also cause the price of vegetables to fall. (Objective reasons can cause the value to rise or fall, but
The condition of "asking the trader to understand" must be met. For example, if Party A does not know that it is snowing at all, the price cannot be raised on the grounds of snow. Similarly, if Party A does not know that the food is not fresh, the price will not fall.)
At the same time, vegetable sellers cannot raise prices with reasons such as "I can't open the pot at home", "It costs a lot of money for my children to go to school", or "You are ugly and have brought mental damage to me". (Traded
The person cannot increase the price based on his own subjective reasons)
However, if the buyer and seller are acquaintances and know each other's family situation, the act of selling miserably can increase the price. However, what increases the price here is not the sale itself, but the "friendship" between the two. (The trader is in
The price can be increased if the subjective reasons of the person being traded are understood and recognized, "recognition" is the key point)
As for why the person being traded can independently judge the end of the transaction...
This is because the trader did not specify the specific content.
This is like asking a vegetable seller to chop onions into chopped green onions for you. After chopping, you want some green onions. The vegetable seller will definitely not return the chopped green onions to you. Instead, he will ask you to pay for the green onions again.
You chop.
As for the starting price, please refer to the price increase and decrease issues mentioned above.
Pricing is based on common sense and the cognition of the person being traded. For example, a poor man who is down and out, his self-perception is "One hundred thousand is enough for me to sell my life." Therefore, his life is priced at 100,000. When trading
When it happens, a coin can buy his life.
Just like when buying vegetables, you directly say to the store "Give me a radish for three yuan." Then you pay three yuan and the store will give you a radish, but the amount given to you is based on the store's own pricing.
Then it’s about the transaction content.
Just like in design, the broader the requirements given, the greater the space for the designer to play. But here is a situation that is different from Party A and Party B in reality.
Finally, it’s about pricing——
The simpler the transaction content, the more accurately it can be completed, and the more complex and vague the statement, the greater the room for the person being traded to play.
The protagonist said "keep quiet", but did not say how long it will be quiet, so Jessica will decide the time according to her own "pricing". And because this transaction is ongoing, Jessica can "keep quiet" when she "feels it is not worth it"
"Stop actively. In other words, in theory, you can shut up for a moment and feel that it is not worthwhile and then end the transaction, but the premise is that the trader subconsciously believes that "just shutting up for a moment is worth a hundred thousand dollars."
That is, unlike in reality, Party A can unlimitedly ask for repayment and redoing. In a transaction reached through the exchange of coins, as long as Party B's performance complies with the transaction content, Party A must pay again if he wants to repay it.
But on the contrary, because there is no "bargaining", the person being traded will also complete the deal wholeheartedly.
That is to say, if this poor man happens to get a commission to buy a kidney, and can sell his life for a higher price (objectively), he can refuse the transaction with "not enough money", provided that the proposed trader knows that selling kidneys can make more money.
many.
But if he is just because of reasons such as "I changed my mind", "I'm afraid", "I want more", it will not have an impact on the transaction.
In short, the coins printed by the protagonist are a collection of illusions based on the recognition of the commercial social system that "everything can be traded". The essence is that "everything has a price". There are only those who can afford it and those who cannot afford it. There is no such thing.
Things that cannot be bought.
The so-called "death is not enough" is just because the psychological price is high enough to exceed the price of one's own life.
Well, this is not my value, it is just describing the essence of this illusion.