Kama Taj's spells are different from those of the mages in orthodox fantasy novels. Most of the time, they do not chant spells. Many of their spells are cast through gestures, but it does not mean that their spells do not have spells. In fact, the difficulty of learning a spell is almost equivalent to a college student experiencing a professional book. In analogy, Kama Taj's mage is considered a medical student among the spell casters, and none of these guys are fools.
On the contrary, most people are very smart. In fact, Kama Taj's mages are basically elites. There is no such cool story of poor losers suddenly being taken aback and then soaring into the sky. This thing has a very high qualification!
Don’t just think that these people are not good when you hear that they are elites.
The elite class itself has two sides!
The elite class refers to a successful class with wealth and social status, received higher education, and had certain social relations and backgrounds, mainly including proletarians such as state-owned enterprise executives and wealthy private business owners. This class controls 80% of the wealth and resource distribution rights of society and becomes a leader in all walks of life. Their core advantage lies in being proficient in capital operations and being good at using leverage to expand their influence. High education, strong assets and high income are their common characteristics. Usually, their families have rich assets and enjoy real wealth freedom, and their income is often in millions. Among these elites, there are many examples of rising from grassroots. Through education and continuous self-improvement, they become leaders in the industry and even shape the future of the industry. Their decision-making can often lead the development direction of the entire industry. People in this class have keen insight and can directly hit the core of the problem.
The reason why the elite class can stand out in various fields is because they have unique knowledge and ability advantages. In terms of depth of thought, they can deeply analyze and think about complex problems and put forward forward-looking views and solutions. For example, in the field of science and technology, elite engineers can accurately grasp the development trends of the industry and lead the trend of technological innovation. Taking Silicon Valley 15 years ago as an example, many Indian engineers have created glory in the highly competitive field of science and technology with their outstanding professional abilities.
They not only master advanced technical knowledge, but also have the ability to think innovatively and solve practical problems. The professional ability of the elite is one of the keys to their success. They usually accumulate rich professional knowledge and experience through long-term learning and practice. Whether in the fields of finance, education or art, elites can use their professional skills to create value for society. At the same time, the elites often have the qualities of diligence and self-discipline. They can self-drive, constantly pursue progress, and maintain high-level output. This self-management awareness allows them to stand out in a highly competitive society and become the best in their respective fields.
The elite class often has the characteristics of being maverick.
They do not follow the trend and dare to challenge traditional concepts and thinking patterns. When facing problems, they can think from different angles and propose unique solutions. For example, in the field of scientific and technological innovation, elites often rely on their reverse thinking to break the rules and promote technological progress and development. In addition, the elites usually do not like to trouble others. They have a high ability to manage themselves and solve problems. In the process of pursuing goals, they tend to rely more on their own efforts and wisdom rather than on the help of others. At the same time, the elites also pay attention to the pursuit of spiritual satisfaction. They are not only satisfied with the accumulation of material wealth, but also pay attention to the enrichment and improvement of the spiritual world. They broaden their horizons and enrich their inner world through reading, travel, art, etc.
This kind of person is needed by Kama Taj, and those who have always been educated happily cannot learn Kama Taj spells... Although that thing is metaphysics, it is actually an extremely complex and rigorous system, even more profound and difficult to understand than modern science.
Most people have no clear logical thinking ability, strong learning ability, and strong self-discipline, so they can't learn it!
The most important thing is that Kama Taj does not charge tuition fees, and there is no student loan.
Of course, this is not a complete advocacy of elite class or elitism.
Early elitism did have a certain aristocratic tendency, using identity, status and property as the criteria for measuring elites. However, over time, elitism gradually integrated democratic elements and became more complicated in attitude towards the masses. On the one hand, elitism was misunderstood as contempt for the masses. In the eyes of popularists, elitists seemed to be a group of people who despise ordinary people, believing that the masses were ignorant, blind and pretentious.
Of course, this is not entirely nonsense. Just look at the American founding fathers. They are definitely elitists and they just despise the public.
To put it uncommonly, the United States has never been a democratic country.
It was founded as a republic, with the so-called founding fathers openly hostile to democracy. This is evident from the Federalist Collection, the founding documents of the United States, and the initial governance practices. It is well known that the Native Americans, known in the Declaration of Independence, were not granted democratic rights in the newly formed republic, nor were slaves and women from Africa. This was the case for ordinary white workers. As scholars such as Terry Bolton have detailed records: "Most ordinary white people do not believe that the (American) revolution established a government with their own ideals and interests as their primary goal. Instead, they were convinced that the revolutionary elites reshape the government for their own interests and undermined the independence of the ordinary people."
After all, the Constitutional Convention did not establish a universal suffrage system for presidents, the Supreme Court or the Senate. The only exception was the House. However, election qualifications were set by the state legislature, with a general requirement to possess property as the basis for voting rights. Therefore, it was no surprise that progressive critics of the time pointed this out. "This is not a democracy," said Patrick Henry of the United States. George Mason described the new constitution as "the boldest attempt to establish an authoritarian aristocrat among the free people, which has never been seen in the world."
This chapter does not end, please click on the next page to continue reading! Although the term “Republic” was widely used to describe the United States at the time, this situation began to change when Andrew Jackson, known as the “Indian Killer” for his genocide policy, participated in the presidential election in the late 1820s. He portrayed himself as a democrat and demanded an end to the rule of the aristocracy in Massachusetts and Virginia. Although there was no structural change in the governance model, politicians and other elite members and their managers began to describe the republic with the word “Democracy”, implying that it serves the interests of the people. Of course, this tradition has continued: democracy is nothing more than an euphemism of bourgeois oligarchy.
Meanwhile, the class struggle in the United States has lasted for two and a half centuries, and democratic forces often win very significant concessions from the ruling class. The field of elections has expanded to include senators and presidents, and although the electoral college has not yet been abolished, the Supreme Court justices are still appointed for life. But the right to vote has expanded to women, African Americans and Native Americans. Of course, these major achievements should be defended, expanded, and made it more substantial through in-depth democratic reforms throughout the election and campaign process. However, despite the importance of these democratic progress, they have not changed the overall system of chaebol rule.
Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page demonstrated in a very important study based on multivariate statistical analysis that “economic elites and organized groups representing commercial interests have substantial independent influence on the policies of the U.S. government, while the independent influence of ordinary citizens and mass interests is small or none”. Of course, this chaebolist form of domination is effective not only at home but also at international level. The United States is trying to impose its anti-democratic form of business domination wherever possible. Of course, I
It is indeed recognized that for various reasons, expressions such as bourgeois democracy, formal democracy and liberal democracy are often used to express this form of chaebol rule. It is also worth stressing that the existence of certain forms of democratic rights under chaebol rule is a major victory for the working people and its importance should not be degraded in any way. What we ultimately need is a dialectical assessment that explains the complexity of the governance model, including the control of the American oligarchs over the state and the important rights won by the people through class struggle.
American Charter: We never recognize that it is a democratic system, that republic is ours, and democracy is yours.
Many people think that democracy means that all rights belong to the masses and that they decide everything. But this is actually an extremism and anarchism, which will lead to the inability to operate the government and the country fall into chaos. To prevent this situation, the founding ancestors of the United States thought about the constitution formulated and found a way to limit the proliferation of democracy - the US Constitution does not mention democracy at all; the United States implements a republican system and resolutely abandons democratic systems; the United States implements the "separation of powers" with the purpose of strengthening democracy, but to limit the supreme democratic rights of the Legislative Council and the parliament. The government implements the presidential responsibility system, and the president has the right to shelve legislative proposals and disband Congress. No matter how public opinion is reflected, legislation that reflects public opinion cannot be passed. According to the US Constitution, the president is not elected directly, but is indirectly elected by the "elective college" of each state.
Rush, the signer of the American Declaration of Independence, said: "Democracy is the sin of the devil, and those who shout democracy are all mad dogs."
"The experiences of all past times show that democracy is the most unstable, volatile, and shortest-lived." "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It quickly wastes, consumes and murders itself. No democracy has ever been killed before," "democracy will quickly regress to dictatorship."
"Democracy is a pair of glasses composed of unrest and struggles that are always contrary to personal safety, or property rights, and are often short-lived in riots," Madison said.
Fisher, who wrote the First Amendment to the Constitution, said: "Democracy is a volcano that contains the burning substance that destroys itself, which will erupt and cause destruction. The known tendency of democracy is to overflow the ambitious call and ignorant beliefs as freedom."
To prevent "tyranny of the majority", states with small territory and small populations can still receive a considerable number of electoral votes.
"We have seen the hustle and bustle at the end of democracy. Wherever it is, democracy is based on dictatorship."
Hamilton pointed out more directly: "Democracy is a disease."
This is what the founding fathers of the United States emphasized when introducing the American political system. The most important principle of the American political system is to ensure that "the administrative department dares to have strength and has the determination to act according to their own opinions", rather than governing according to public opinion. The government must not only serve the people, but also have the ability to educate and domesticate the people; the people can express their opinions, but do not allow public opinion to interfere with the government's governance. The founding fathers of the United States are very vigilant and rejected in their attitude towards public opinion. They pointed out bluntly, "Some people with ulterior motives are nonsense that the people are wise at all times and can find ways to solve the problem. But the people know from their own experience that they will make mistakes; because the people are deceived, bewitched and deceived by those parasites and ambitious people and flatterers all day long. It is better to say that the people will not make mistakes often when they are often disturbed by such things, so it is better to say that this is a complete myth."
In today's opinion, "democracy" and "republic" mean similar, but during the Constitutional Convention, the representatives were very concerned about the difference between the two.
Democracy: refers to ensuring that people can participate in governing the country through institutional means.
This is the elite. They do not trust the people and only believe in themselves. At the same time, once the elite class spreads, it will have a great impact on the entire society. They will lead to the solidification of the entire social class, and the most obvious one is the United States. (There is no way, this country is too typical)
This chapter is not finished yet, please click on the next page to continue reading the exciting content behind! From kindergarten to university, the differentiation of the education system has quietly solidified the social class. Elite education paved the way for a few people, but happy education pushed most people into the abyss of cognition and skills. The shortage of grassroots talents, the rise in illiteracy rate, and the lack of social mobility.
Happy education is not really for the happiness of children, but for the lower-level people to receive limited knowledge and completely lose the ability to climb up. Since kindergarten, most children have entered a "free-range" route. They go to school at 8 am and leave at 3 pm, and have almost no homework or exams. The classroom atmosphere is so relaxed that it can even be called "undisciplined": teachers are indifferent to students' learning, the content of the textbook is ridiculously simple, and many students can't even master the basic addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. Children who grow up in this environment have almost no competitiveness after graduation. They can only enter factories or low-end service industries, screw screws, deliver express delivery, and move shelves year after year. Many people even drop out of school and live on the edge of society.
At the same time, American elite education has reached another extreme.
In top private schools, students are instilled with completely different ideas: competition, hard work, and pursuit of excellence. These schools use high tuition fees as the threshold, and can easily reach 50,000 or 60,000 US dollars a year, which ordinary families cannot afford. Children who are lucky enough to enter these schools are driven by strict schedules and heavy academic pressure. They only sleep four or five hours a day, supplemented by coffee and energy drinks, and spend all their time improving grades and accumulating backgrounds. Because they know that only by performing excellently on campus can they enter top universities such as Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, and these schools are "passes" to the middle and high levels of society.
Therefore, the criteria for selecting Kama Taj is very unique. They will never choose the kind of person who is proud and thinks they can control everything. Such people's pursuit of power is too serious, which will affect the entire Kama Taj atmosphere. On the contrary, those who are scholars or who have seen through the truth of life and society will be selected!