Does the United States still need a wartime system? Does the United States need a more powerful president to lead her to win this new round of world war that is about to break out? These two questions were raised by the New York Times more than a month ago.
came out and caused heated controversy among the people. It is worth mentioning that in many places in the United States, because of the different positions on these two issues, many former friends turned against each other, and even couples who were originally in love slept in separate beds.
, as a result, it is common for strangers to have fierce quarrels and even use pistols.
From the general neutralism at the beginning of World War II to the current polarization of nationalism and pessimism, the social class contradictions that already existed in American society are becoming more and more acute with the economic downturn and the decline of the country's international status.
.
"The United States urgently needs a victory now, no matter who the enemy is. Otherwise, I can't imagine whether our people will still trust our government. The position of the United States in World War II and where it should stand now is
This is something that the big shots in the White House and Capitol Hill should consider. But when you think about the fact that I have not received a salary increase for four consecutive years, and the prices on the market are getting more and more expensive, oh, has God abandoned America?" This paragraph
The text comes from a well-known commentator in the New York Times. The reason why he wrote such a text at this time against the will of the White House is because the secret treaty signing incident between the United States and Japan that occurred in the late World War II actually had a negative impact on the U.S. government and even the United States.
A self-denial of American society. It not only denied the core policies of the United States during the Roosevelt era, but also denied the contributions made by the American people to the country during this period.
As in that time and space, although isolationism and neutralism were rampant in the United States before the war, Americans did not care about things outside the United States. However, as the United States declared war on Germany and Japan and officially sent troops to the Pacific, Americans' patriotic enthusiasm suddenly
He was inspired. In that time and space, Ouyang Yun had seen a report, which specifically introduced how American women held up half the sky during World War II and were used by men. As far as he knew now, this report was not biased.
After a large number of men of working age were drafted into the military, the domestic industrial and agricultural production in the United States was actually maintained by women.
I have to say that perhaps because they had the experience of resisting the British colonists (which is of course just), Americans do not lack a sense of justice. Therefore, even though the US government’s starting point for starting a war with Germany and Japan is inseparable from this or that
interests, but at least in the eyes of the American people, this is a just act and an international obligation that an emerging country like the United States should bear. As an American, it is worthy of praise to make some sacrifices and contributions to world peace.
Things are very meaningful.
Of course, this was naturally fueled by the U.S. government. The U.S. government used media propaganda to describe Germany and Japan as demons, and the United States naturally became a warrior who dared to fight the demons.
The question is, the sacrifices Americans made before were for justice and world peace. So what is going on with the alliance between the United States and Japan now? Or, what the U.S. government did before was wrong. What Americans call "for humanity"
Are the slogans of fighting for peace just meant to fool us ordinary people? Is what we did before still meaningful?
There is no doubt that the current United States has the highest level of education in the world. The higher the level of education, the less likely it is to be deceived and fooled. What Truman did not know was that, just beyond his sight, some Americans
(The majority of them are women, and they are widows who lost their husbands) are secretly uniting, and what they want to do is to seek an explanation for their husbands or relatives who died in the war with Japan.
"Of course there are just and unjust wars, so there is such a saying as a just teacher. When one party in the war loses his justice, it is not only the morale that is affected, but also the morale of an army.
Stay grounded!"
This passage also comes from Simon. More than ten years later, when Simon became one of the most famous journalists in China, he went to the United States to investigate the "wives' revolution" that broke out in the United States during the three world wars, and then came to the above conclusion.
A penetrating argument about the justice of the military.
However, what Simon would never have imagined and failed to investigate was that the Chinese played a rather disgraceful (according to the U.S. government of course) role in the American Revolution, known historically as the "Wife's Revolution."
While Truman was seeking higher power, Kong Lingyi, who had been wandering around Washington, keenly seized an opportunity. While attending a war salon, she was fortunate enough to meet a widow who had lost two husbands and a son on the battlefield.
An Li. After discovering that An Li was full of resentment towards the U.S. government and even had the idea of assassinating Truman, she immediately took the initiative and quickly became friends with this melancholy American woman.
Historians from various countries in later generations generally have different opinions on the specific time when the "wife revolution" broke out. However, they have a unified understanding of the initiator of the revolution, that is, they unanimously believe that Anli was the first to engage in this revolution.
movement, and it was precisely because of her outstanding leadership that the widows and war-hating people in the United States were able to unite and ultimately successfully launch a subversive revolution.
This is a later story, let’s not mention it for now. A week later, when the Chinese aircraft carrier fleet Wu Dao Tian Wang sailed into the Pacific and appeared in Guam, Truman got his wish and persuaded the overwhelming majority of members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to declare that the United States
Entered the wartime management system again. On the same day, Truman brokered a deal to purchase the Mason Security Company from MacArthur in the name of the government for a symbolic price of one dollar.
The next day, Truman announced the formation of the European Army and authorized Army Lieutenant General Patton to expand the European Army with the Masonic mercenaries. He required the latter to expand the European Army to fifteen divisions and fifteen divisions within one month.
About ten thousand people.
On the same day, he held a press conference at the White House to clarify the U.S. government's position in Europe, saying that in order to stabilize the situation in Europe as soon as possible, the United States has the obligation to send troops to Europe to help European countries completely defeat Germany, the culprit who provoked World War II - "
…The U.S. government believes that the current German government also bears unshirkable responsibility for the massacre of Jews in Germany and the start of World War II. Therefore, the U.S. government urges the current German government to immediately stop all war actions and report to NATO
Surrender. The U.S. government hereby guarantees that as long as the German government is willing to surrender and pay compensation to the victimized countries, the U.S. government is willing to guarantee the integrity of German territory and the independence of the country..."