Next, we will review Wen Desi's "Work Report of the Executive Committee of the First General Assembly of Travelers from 1628 to 1629" and Ma Qianzhu's "Work Report of the Planning People's Committee from 1628 to 1629". Because the two reports are very long together,
The full text is nearly 150,000 words, and it has been published on BBS for many days, so I will not read it again at the conference and directly enter the discussion and deliberation stage. There are not many speakers, probably because the report is too long and involves
The coverage is very broad, and few people are willing to take a closer look. Criticisms mainly focus on the fact that the executive committee does not pay enough attention to the lives of ordinary people, has long ignored the sexual needs of the people, and the cadre appointment system is not transparent.
The vest noticed that Shan Liang did not jump up to speak, and the people who jumped up and down the most during the parade: Cheng Mo, Sun Li and others did not stand up to speak.
Strange, are they still preparing a back-up plan to strike at a critical moment? Ma Jia was on guard while presiding over the meeting.
However, judging from the content of the speech, it is obvious that the vast majority of the public has not read these two crucial "Work Reports" - at least not carefully. The questions raised by the spokesperson are based on his own perceptual thinking.
The product, Ma Jia, shook his head: This group of people are really too naive to engage in parliamentary struggle.
The spokesperson didn't even have basic information about the person he was questioning. He relied on what he saw or even what he heard. He made up his mind entirely based on his own feelings. It's strange that such suspicions can be effective.
Everyone will talk about the word democracy, but it seems that everyone still has no idea how to carry out democracy.
After entering the public vote, the two reports were passed with an absolute majority of approval. Ma Jia thought this was also expected: there is no need to list many numbers, everyone can see the rapid development of Lingao's industry, agriculture and various constructions.
. No one doubts the working ability of the old executive committee, and no one can deny their performance. In fact, what everyone is most afraid of is that this prosperity will have nothing to do with them. How can the new executive committee make everyone feel after the change of boundaries?
When it comes to "common interests", this is what matters most.
Most of the meetings on the first day were administrative matters, with little contentious content, and rarely involving hot issues that everyone was concerned about. They were basically "procedural" motions, and Ma Jia wanted to familiarize everyone with them first.
Familiar with the way things are discussed. It also makes it easier to make corrections at any time.
The rules of procedure developed by the people from the Majia and Law Clubs have also started to stumble in practical application.
On the second day, the meeting turned to issues of greater concern to the participants, starting with the review of the Common Programme. The Common Programme is equivalent to a constitution within the current cross-border group.
In order to revise this common program, the Law Club, while taking into account the work of the Preparatory Committee, also formed a special group to take charge of this matter. The group was divided into political and legal, financial and economic, military and diplomatic, cultural and educational groups to conduct special demonstrations and participate in the demonstrations.
In addition to the members of the Law Club, professionals from all walks of life were also specially invited to express their opinions at the demonstration meeting. The group for formulating a common program outside of majors also paid attention to the divisions of social composition and ethnic groups. They will have common life experiences and backgrounds.
, people with similar occupations and political leanings are divided into small groups, and then representative figures are found from this group to solicit opinions and write relevant provisions respectively.
On this basis, the drafting group will name the first draft of the "Common Program of the Crossing Group at the Current Stage" and publish the full text on the internal bbs for public consultation and discussion to widely absorb suggestions from all aspects.
Most of the clauses of the common program are the basic consensus within the Traveling group, such as that all people in Traveling are equal, and that Traveling people are more equal than indigenous people, etc. However, there are still a lot of differences, which not only involve the interests of many parties but also involve the values of many people. This
There are more than 500 people with all kinds of values, including staunch universalists, totalitarians, emperors, leftists, and rightists. Therefore, during the consultation stage, there are constantly people on the intranet bbs
Various suggestions and opinions were specially put forward on bbs. The focus of the opinions mainly focused on the power structure, the inheritance of the tribe, the status of the indigenous people and the attitude towards foreign ethnic groups. The opinions collected from various aspects on bbs indicate the attitudes of all parties
Quite antagonistic. Ma Jia believes that this is not a bad thing - for a semi-rabble like the Chuan Chuan Group, it is more realistic to admit differences of opinion and decide the future direction of the group through public discussion than to force "unification of thinking".
"As long as there is sufficient discussion and the approval of the general meeting, those who want to overturn it in the future can use the hat of public opinion to suppress it," he said.
Because these issues are sensitive and involve personal values, it is difficult to force everyone to accept the regulations without the support of public opinion.
If you want to overturn the resolution, you have to take the road of parliamentary struggle. However, this requires high organizational skills, oratory skills, and political judgment. It cannot be done by complaining and saying weird things in a pub or on a bbs.
. In the future, being an opposition will be a highly technical job. Ma Jia hopes that future internal struggles within the Time Travel Group will be limited to the parliament, instead of engaging in street politics like the Maid Revolution and using demonstrations.
Express one's wishes - the latter can easily cause riots and be easily exploited by careerists.
After more than half a month of publicity and soliciting opinions, the initial draft was revised several times. From the time the first draft was written to the second plenary meeting, a total of three drafts were revised in more than half a month. The drafting team
It was discussed 3 times by itself, 2 times by the Law Club, and 2 times by the Preparatory Committee. It was not until the draft was basically passed through a secret vote on the intranet BBS that it was formally submitted to the second plenary meeting.
Submit text for discussion.
The final text submitted was a very brief text, which could only be regarded as a "Provisional Charter". In addition to the preamble, it was divided into seven chapters: general outline, political organs, military system, economic policy, cultural and educational policy, ethnic policy, and foreign policy.
Article 60. Determines the nature, tasks and general principles, policies and principles of the Cross-Travel Group in all aspects.
Politically speaking, the "Common Program" stipulates that the state system of the traveling group is an aristocratic republic. The senatorial class composed of all the traveling groups is the ruling class and enjoys all the highest political, economic and legal power. The Senate composed of the senators is the highest authority of the traveling country.
authority.
The program reaffirmed the resolution made in the first plenary session: the seats of senators are inherited hereditary by the children of the senators. Unless the senators are extinct or the Senate votes to pass a "deprivation order", the seats cannot be cancelled.
The senator enjoys the right of personal protection. The personal freedom, personal safety and property of the senator are sacred and inviolable. Except with the authorization of the Senate, no person or organization has the right to arrest, try and confiscate the property of the senator. The criminal suspicion of the senator and the relationship with the indigenous people
Criminal and civil lawsuits are handled by the Court of Honor authorized by the Senate.
All senators are equal and enjoy the right to vote, elect and be elected in the Senate. They also enjoy all the rights stipulated by law for senators.
Legally, there is unequal personal rights between the elders and the natives. Specific to criminal cases: if the elders kill the elders, they will only be punished with property crimes; if the natives kill the elders, they will be convicted according to the criminal law of the future of the country. The elders and the natives
Once the judgment in criminal and civil litigation between the natives is final, it is not subject to appeal, but the elders can appeal once.
Criminal and civil lawsuits between senators are handled by the Court of Honor. However, the Court of Honor has no power to sentence a senator to death or to declare a "deprivation order" depriving him of his senatorial seat - a resolution must be made by the Senate.
Only when the elders are proven guilty of the following crimes - killing other elders; voluntarily defecting to other forces to work for them; deliberately destroying the production capacity and scientific and technological data of the crossing group, causing irreparable losses; declaring independence and establishing their own business - can
There is a possibility of being deprived of the senatorial seat and sentenced to death.
Any crime or charge other than this, regardless of whether it can be proven or not, shall not be sentenced to death. The most severe punishment is to be deprived of a seat in the Senate for life. This seat can be inherited and restored by his children after the death of the senator.
Under normal circumstances, after a senator is found guilty by the Court of Honor, he can only be sentenced to property penalties and house arrest. During the period of house arrest, he will enjoy a living treatment no lower than the average level of the senator, and the legal property in his name will not be infringed.
The power of the elders is something that has been discussed a lot among the people. Everyone agrees that they must protect their personal safety so that they will not be "purged" or "purged" by some ambitious person one day, and have to wear unwarranted clothes.
hat, we must ensure the personal safety of every senator, regardless of his political profile and code of conduct. Some people even suggested during the discussion that a senator should not be sentenced to death for any crime other than killing other senators. However,
There are also quite a few people who believe that if it is too broad, it will lack some legal deterrence, and it will easily cause the elders to do whatever they want.
When entering the discussion stage of the conference, Sun Li stood up and asked to speak. He raised objections to the last three of the four counts that sentenced him to death. He believed that the last three counts were more arbitrary and could easily be exploited.
"Voluntarily defecting to other forces and deliberately destroying productivity can be achieved by forging evidence." Sun Li doubted, "When the Soviet Union launched a counter-revolutionary purge, many marshals and generals, including Tukhachevsky,
The charges, evidence, and witnesses for the so-called treason are all available. Who can guarantee that someone will commit such a crime?"